Smart Money Tracker
- INFLATION/DEFLATION DEBATE I thought I would post on a topic that's sure to stir some dander, mostly because I just needed something to clean the comments.My thoughts are and have been for a while that in a purely fiat system deflation isn't an inevitability, it's a choice.The only time we've seen real deflation was in the 30's and that was because the dollar was anchored to gold (money supply was constricted). I know many will immediately jump on the Japan bandwagon but Japan didn't really experience deflation. Prices didn't collapse like they did in the 30's (a true deflation). They stagnated (except real estate and stocks which were in a bubble), mostly because Japan funded their bailouts with internal savings. They never actually resorted to quantitative easing. If they had prices wouldn't have even stagnatedThe only other time than the 30's that we've seen real deflation was in late `08 to March `09.Many have the view that we will experience deflation first then inflation, but I would point out we already did. We just went through the deflation part of the equation in 08/09. That was true deflation. Prices for virtually everything were collapsing. It lasted for 9 months.Just like Roosevelt did in the 30's, Bernanke stopped deflation dead in its tracks by massively inflating the money supply. If deflation is an inevitability how could that possibly have happened?I've heard all the ridiculous theories that without credit expansion we can't have inflation (actually total credit is expanding almost exponentially as the government has taken over where the consumer has left off). I'm sorry they don't hold water. Almost across the board we have had massive inflation in virtually all asset markets since early `09. All without the banks lending. Obviously the liquidity that Ben has forced into the market has landed in the financial markets first.Let me say this again because it's important. As long as a country is willing to destroy it's currency deflation isn't an option. The key in that statement is "the willingness to destroy the currency".If deflation starts to get a toe hold again the government could simply print money and mail out checks to every man, woman, and child. Does anyone think in that scenario deflation is possible? Of course it's not.The deflationist's will argue that the government can't, or won't, do that. Hey they have to make that assumption because obviously deflation isn't possible if the government just starts mailing free money to everyone.But the fact is that they can and they will, actually they already have...twice. They were called rebate checks. Anyone who thinks it won't happen again if deflation starts to rear it's head is just kidding themselves.In a purely fiat system deflation is a choice. I would say it's pretty clear that the government is willing to sacrifice the currency to keep deflation at bay and they have been doing so ever since 2001.For me to buy the deflation theory one would have to explain how Ben could have stopped the worst deflationary spiral in a mere 9 months and you will have to explain to me how deflation can possibly survive another bout of free money (more tax rebates or whatever they choose to call them next time).
- HOPING FOR A BREAK I want to discuss something that came up on the blog Friday. An anonymous poster hinted that we were going to see more gold weakness in the days ahead because Paulson was having to sell his positions. Folks, big smart money traders like John Paulson don’t sell into weakness. These kind of investors don’t think like the typical retail investor who is forever trying to avoid draw downs. Big money investors take positions based on fundamentals and then they continually buy dips until the fundamentals reverse. The fundamentals haven’t reversed for gold so I’m confident in saying that Paulson isn’t selling his gold, he is using this dip to accumulate.With that being said there are times when big money will sell into the market and it is why so often technical analysis as it’s used by retail traders doesn’t work. They do so in order to accumulate positions. Let me explain.When a large fund wants to buy, it can’t just simply start buying stock like you or I would. Doing so would run the market up causing them to fill at higher and higher prices. Unlike the average retail trader, smart money attempts to buy into weakness and sell into strength. (Buy low, sell high). In order to buy in the kind of size they need without moving the market against themselves, a large trader needs very liquid conditions. Ask yourself, when do those kind of conditions exist? They happen when markets break technical levels. Smart money understands how to “play” the technical traders.If Paulson is selling it is because he is trying to push the market below a significant technical level so all the technicians will puke up their shares to him. By running an important technical level he can trigger a ton of sell stops to activate, allowing him to accumulate a large position without moving the market against himself in the process. We saw this very thing happen in the oil market recently and also in February as gold bottomed. Technical traders wrongly assume these breaks are continuation patterns but the reality is that very often they are just smart money “playing” the technical crowd so they can enter large positions. The key to watch for is an immediate reversal of a technical break. When that happens you know there was someone in the market buying when everyone else was selling. 9 times out of 10 it was smart money.At the moment everyone is jumping on the bear side for gold. Remember we saw this exact same sentiment in the stock market 3 weeks ago. I knew the bears were going to be wrong simply because the market was way too late in the intermediate cycle for there to be enough time left for a significant decline.The gold bears are going to be wrong also and for the exact same reason. It is just too late in the intermediate cycle for there to be enough time left for anything other than a minor decline.I'm now waiting, and hoping for a break of the May pivot. I want to play that break if it comes like a smart money trader. That means I want to buy into the break instead of panic sell like most dumb money retail traders will invariably do. The reason of course is that gold is still in a secular bull market. In bull markets you buy dips. Also the dollar with the break below 82 this morning is starting to show signs that it is now in the clutches of the 3 year cycle decline. Every C-wave so far in this 10 year bull market has corresponded to a major leg down in the dollar. I'm confident this C-wave will inversely track the dollars move into that major cycle low due early next year.Sentiment wise gold has now reached levels more bearish than at the February bottom. That means gold is at risk of running out of sellers. And finally, and most importantly it's just simply too late in the intermediate cycle for gold to have enough time for a significant drop. This is the 25th week of the cycle and the intermediate cycle rarely lasts more than 25 weeks. That puts the odds heavily in favor of a major bottom either sometime this week or next. And don't forget gold is about to move into the strong demand season. Like clockwork gold invariably puts in a major bottom in July or August before the run up into the strong fall season.The bears are going to be wrong again.
- HEAD & SHOULDERS TOP OR BOTTOM II A couple of weeks ago I posted the possibility that the market might be forming a head and shoulders bottom instead of the top everyone was so focused on. I knew at the time that the intermediate cycle was in the timing band for a major low and sentiment had moved to bearish levels even more extreme than what we saw at the March `09 bottom.Calls for a market crash were flying left and right. I'll let you in on a secret, we always hear that the market is going to crash at intermediate cycle bottoms. The reality is we've had three real market crashes in the last 100 years. The odds of a fourth following right on the heels of the third are pretty darn slim.The first and the third crash were caused by credit bubble implosions and the second was caused by severe overvaluation in the fifth year of a secular bull market. These fifth year corrections are fairly common in long term bull markets as it seems like it takes about five years for sentiment to swing to the extreme bullish side. Then the fifth year correction serves to wipe out that bullish sentiment so the secular fundamentals can continue to drive the bull higher.Not withstanding the very low odds of a market crash, I knew that we were way too late in the intermediate cycle, and sentiment was way too bearish for there to be much chance of the head and shoulders top succeeding (actually head and shoulders patterns only succeed and reach their target about 27% of the time). Not to mention everyone saw it which gave it even less odds of actually playing out like everyone was expecting. At that point it became much more likely that the market wasn't forming a head and shoulders top it was in fact probably going to form a head and shoulders bottom with the half cycle low forming the right shoulder. No one else at the time was calling for any such outcome, as a matter of fact I took an amazing amount of abuse for my temerity to even consider such a ridiculous idea.As of yesterday the Dow has now completed the inverse head and shoulders pattern by breaking the neckline just like I thought it would. Now will it reach it's target (11,200)? The odds say no. But it's anybodies guess at this point. What we do know is that virtually all indexes have rallied out of the half cycle low to new highs thus breaking the pattern of lower lows and lower highs. Higher highs and higher lows is the definition of an uptrend. This was why I'm not ready to call a bear market yet. I was confident this rally was coming and we need to see were it goes before we can say with any confidence that we are back in the secular bear trend.We now have two clear lines in the sand. If the market breaks out to new highs then the perma-bear/deflationists were too early and the cyclical bull still has some kick left. If the market (both Dow and transports) break below the July 1st low then yes the bear is back. As long as the market holds between those two lines we will remain in no-mans land.Right now the market is in rally mode just like I warned would happen. We just have to wait and see whether it turns out to be a bear market rally or another leg up in the cyclical bull market.I for one, have no intentions of trying to guess which it is until one of those lines gets broken.
- DO'IN THE CRAWL One of the few patterns that I actually pay attention to besides triangles and the T1 pattern is the "crawling pattern".Most of the time this plays out in bearish fashion as a stock or index crawls or bumps along a rising 50 day moving average. Once the support breaks it's usually followed by an aggressive move down to test the 200 day moving average.Recently we saw this pattern play out in the dollar index.As you can see when support broke the dollar moved aggressively lower and may still have further to go as it still didn't move all the way back to the 200 DMA yet. I've also noted that the break down powered the rally in the stock market. As a matter of fact both legs down in the dollar powered strong rallies in stocks.I'm pretty confident that if the rally is to continue Bernanke is going to have to keep pressure on the dollar.Now we have this same pattern starting to develop on the S&P although in reverse form. If the market breaks above the 50 it should power a very aggressive move higher.
- DEFLATING DOLLAR In my last post I briefly explained the mechanics of the gold cycles. Tonight I'm going to do the same thing for the dollar. Like I did with gold I'll start with the largest cycle, in the dollars case it is the 3 year cycle. Before I go any further I should probably explain the concept of left and right translated cycles, as it is pertinent to the current situation we find ourselves in.When I call a cycle left translated what I'm saying, in effect, is that the cycle topped left of center. As an example any dollar 3 year cycle that tops in less than a 18 months would be labeled a left translated cycle. One that tops later than 18 months would be a right translated cycle.Why do we care whether a cycle is left or right translated you ask? Well because how a cycle tops will tell us more times than not whether we are in a bear trend or bull trend. Cycles that top as left translated cycles are the hallmark of bear markets and more often than not the cycle trough, when it comes, will move below the prior trough. The opposite is true for right translated cycles.You can see that from `95 till 2001 the dollar was in a secular bull trend. Each one of those cycles topped as extreme right translated cycles and consequently each three year cycle low bottomed well above the previous three year low.That changed after 2001. You can see that the three year cycle that began in the fall of 2001 topped very quickly and then spent the better part of three years declining into the `04 three year cycle low which obviously bottomed considerably below the 2001 low. The next three year cycle also unfolded as a left translated cycle and it too moved below the prior major cycle low.Now despite all the bullish talk about the dollar this cycle is also playing out as an extremely left translated cycle which means the odds are high it too will move below the previous cycle low.Unless the dollar recovers quickly and exceeds the high at 90 it will be in jeopardy of breaking to new lows by next year. I've said this for some time now that the market is eventually going to make Bernanke pay a terrible price for his insane monetary policy. In the real world, a world where magic doesn't work, and Santa Claus and the tooth fairy aren't real, it's not possible to print literally trillions of dollars out of thin air and not have something bad happen to your currency. I'm sorry folks but the world just doesn't work that way. If it did we could just print and print till there wasn't a tree left standing and the value of the dollar would just go up and up.I dare say any teenager can probably grasp the concept of supply and demand. The dollar isn't immune to the laws of supply and demand any more than any other commodity.Now if you really believe the Fed can create a strong currency by printing the dollar into oblivion then I have some ocean front property here in Vegas I'd like to sell you :)The bottom line is that the dollar is approaching the timing band for that move down into the three year cycle low, and unless something changes quick it is in jeopardy of crashing to new lows during that move. And when a currency crashes it is an extremely inflationary event.Next let's move down to the smaller intermediate cycle.Like gold this cycle tends to last about 20 weeks most of the time. However when Ben cranks the printing presses up it tends to stretch the cycle. You can see that both intermediate cycles during the period of quantitative easing stretched rather long and the second was also extremely left translated. Now however we have a right translated cycle and one that is moving into the timing band for an intermediate bottom. Since it is right translated the odds are it should hold above the prior cycle low which came in around 79.50.Now here is the problem and it has to do with the daily cycle.The daily cycle on average lasts about 20-30 days. The recent low is just slightly in the timing band for that low. If this turns out to be the cycle low (and we will have to wait a bit before we can make that determination) then the dollar needs to put in an intermediate bottom right here right now also. If the dollar rolls over and another left translated daily cycle begins it will almost surely break through not only the 82 pivot but the long term support level at 80.If that happens then the odds are going to be high that the decline into the three year cycle low has its hooks into the dollar and we will indeed see the dollar move to new all time lows by next year. If that scenario unfolds it will unleash severe inflationary pressures. I tend to think the recent divergence by virtually the entire commodity sector is already giving us a warning that the market may be ready to exact it's toll for the Fed meddling.We've already seen a mini-crisis in the Euro. It's only a matter of time until the cancer spreads to the worlds reserve currency, and our time may be up.Chart of total debt to GDP. This is about a year old so it's actually a bit higher now. Those who think debt is contracting are sorely mistaken. The government has just taken over where the consumer has left off.
- CARPE AURUM Just like the stock market, gold runs in cycles (all markets do because the humans that trade these markets go through periods of optimism and periods of pessimism).For the purposes of this discussion we will concentrate on the intermediate and daily cycle, after a quick explanation of the two larger degree cycles. At this point all one needs to know is that gold's 8 year cycle bottomed in `08 and isn't due to bottom again until 2016. The yearly cycle bottomed in February, and no yearly cycle except the one at the 8 year cycle low has ever moved below a prior yearly cycle low since the secular bull started in 2001.That means in order for gold to move below $1044 we would have to entertain the fact that the current 8 year cycle has already topped in only two years. That would also mean the secular bull has likely topped. I just don't buy that, as no secular bull in history has ever topped before reaching the bubble stage and gold is clearly a long way from that. So all this nonsense about gold falling back below $1000 is just that - nonsense. The odds of a move back to $1000 anytime during the remainder of this bull market are probably less than 1%. I don't know about you, but I make it a rule to never bet on something with odds of success at only 1%.Now let's move in and take a look at the next larger cycle, the intermediate cycle. This cycle has averaged 18 weeks since the secular bull began in 2001, but has lengthened to 23 weeks after the global debt problems began in `07.My guess is that the Fed's extreme monetary policy is acting to stretch golds intermediate cycle slightly. As you can see from the chart, gold is now about to enter the 24th week of the current intermediate cycle. This of course means it's becoming extremely dangerous to sell gold. On the contrary, this is the time where savvy investors want to be looking to add to positions. Remember, this is a secular bull market after all, and you only get this kind of opportunity about every 5 to 6 months. You certainly don't want to blow it now as you will have to wait another half year before it comes again, and since this is a bull market the next opportunity is going to come at higher prices. For all you traders who claim that you are going to back up the truck when gold experiences a pullback, well you are getting your pullback right now. The question is, will you follow your own advice?Now let's look at the smaller daily cycle and see if we can pinpoint a closer time frame for when we should be looking for the final bottom of this intermediate cycle.On average the daily cycle tends to run about 20 days. However, it's not completely out of the question to see a cycle run as long as 30 days occasionally. I will also note that we usually see a failed daily cycle as gold moves into a final intermediate cycle low. With that in mind here is where I think we are in the current daily cycle which, by the way, does appear to be a failed and left translated cycle as it was unable to break to new highs.It appears we are now on day 16 of this cycle. Since we know that the average duration trough to trough for a daily cycle is 20-30 days, we can extrapolate a reasonable timing band for a final bottom somewhere in the next one to two weeks.Here's what to look for. First off, I think gold will need to retrace at least 50% of the intermediate rally. That would come in around $1155.Next, I would like to see sentiment turn extremely bearish. We are already well on our way to that happening as public sentiment is now nearing the same levels we saw at the February intermediate cycle bottom. Another big clue will be to watch the comments on the blog. At intermediate cycle bottoms troll infestation will become intense with comments reaching upwards of 200-300 per post. That is always a fool proof sign that gold is about to slam down on the shorts. Hey, this is a secular bull market after all, what could you possibly be thinking trying to short gold? About this time we will see the conspiracy theorists start blaming a mysterious gold cartel for what in reality is just a normal correction within an ongoing bull market, and one that happens like clockwork about every 20 weeks.So the bottom line is we are on the verge of getting one of the best buying opportunities we ever get in a bull market sometime in the next week or two. The question you have to ask yourself is, will you take it or will you let the "technicals" talk you into missing another fleeting chance to accumulate at bargain prices in the only secular bull market left? Let's face it, at intermediate cycle bottoms the technicals are not going to look like a bottom. Instead, they are going to look like the bull is broken. Only those people who can think like a value investor and keep the big picture firmly in mind are able to buy into an intermediate cycle bottom. You have to make a decision. Are you going to seize the opportunity or are you going to let the bull trick you into losing your position?Carpe Aurum(Seize the gold)
- BOREDOM PARADOX Now that gold is holding consistently above $1000 it's going to become tougher and tougher for gold to shed riders, which is mandatory if the bull is to continue higher. That means the bull is going to have to pull out every trick in the book in order to get investors to jump ship. The greatest trick the gold bull pulls isn’t the D-wave decline (although that is a doozie). No, the greatest trick the bull pulls on investors is the boredom paradox. Basically this rule says that before any big leg up gold will wander around long enough that everyone becomes so bored they finally give up and jump ship. The paradox is that usually during this period gold is trending higher. Let me show you some examples of the boredom paradox in action.You can see these things often occur during the summer months. Ultimately they are consolidation patterns after large legs up. We have been in a tedious BP since last December. And even though gold has shown enough strength to actually break out to new highs (the paradox) it is still shedding riders at a vicious clip. I know I’ve seen it in progress. During the run up in November last year riders hopped on the bull in droves. My guess is that probably less than 10% of them have had the stamina to hang on, even though gold has made new highs.Once gold has shaken off virtually every impatient rider then the next leg up will begin. Trust me none of those lost riders will be able to pull the trigger when it happens and the bull, when he starts charging, will instantly leave them behind. Invariably traders buy when the pain of missing the move just becomes too great to endure any longer and that of course ends up as either a short term top or an intermediate term top like we saw last November. Then of course the correction comes and all those Johnny come latelies end up getting knocked out for a loss. Like I said the bull is going to pull out every trick in the book.Now I know many of you are just chomping at the bit, hardly able to wait for the big parabolic move that will top this monster C-wave. You want it and you want it now. Well I think I can tell you without a doubt you aren’t going to get it any time soon. Even if this is the bottom of the intermediate cycle I can virtually guarantee that gold is going to make you suffer through the rest of the summer. C-waves just don’t top out in the middle of summer. They top either in late fall or early spring. (They also top at the end of intermediate cycles and this one is just beginning.) What we can probably expect is a frustrating grind higher. Each marginal new high followed by another move into a daily cycle bottom. In the mean time some other sector will get hot, maybe it will be tech or energy or whatever. But there will be extreme temptation to jump ship, of that I’m positive.I’ve seen this for 9 years now. Investors get frustrated and lose their position and about that time gold and miners will start to rally. It won’t be noticeable at first. As a matter of fact by the time you notice it gold will be overbought. And you know you won’t be able to make yourself buy into overbought levels, so you will sit on the sidelines waiting for a correction. Some of you will manage to hang on until the correction comes, most won’t. They will panic in at a short term top. It never fails. Like I said, I’ve seen it for 9 years now.Of those that managed to wait for the correction probably less than 50% will be able to buy because as we all know by now, this is a volatile sector. Corrections are scaring looking. It’s tough to buy into them. I have to laugh when I see these comments about how a trader is going to back up the truck if we get a correction. Did any of us see any backing up of the truck at the February low or during the recent correction? No of course not, because bottoms never look like bottoms. They always look like the trend will continue. So the vast majority of truck backers never load the truck.The only way to avoid getting taken out by the Boredom Paradox is to just hang on. As long as you make up your mind that nothing the damn bull does is going to buck you off no matter what tricks he pulls then you will be there when the charge starts. Trust me on this one, all the pain and frustration will be worth it if you can last long enough to make it to that final parabolic move. I don’t doubt for a second that we will eventually see miners break out above that 519 resistance and when they finally do they are going to go a long long ways. I will be totally flabbergasted if we don’t see the HUI above 750, maybe even above 1000 during this final C-wave. But you are never going to get there if you let the BP knock you off the bull.
- BEAR'S BEWARE II In my last article Bear's Beware, I warned that shorts were running the risk of getting caught in an explosive rally as the intermediate cycle was due to bottom. Well, it did bottom and bears have watched their profits quickly evaporate as the market has surged out of the intermediate cycle low. The initial thrust out of one of these major cycle bottoms will usually gain 6-10% in the first 8-13 days. We are now 5 days in and up 6.6% so far. I expect we will see a test of the 200 day moving average before we see any significant pull back. These initial moves out of intermediate bottoms don’t tend to wait around as smart money smelling blood in the street pile in quickly.It's only the little guy, who doesn't understand what has just happened, that continues to fight the trend change. This is usually about the time that I see the technicians start calling for this or that resistance level or trend line to put a halt to the rally. They are, of course, assuming this is a bear market rally and it will soon be over.First off, let me say I'm not convinced yet that the cyclical bull is dead. I would need to see the market come back down and break the recent lows first. If both the transports and industrials do that then yes, we will have a Dow Theory sell signal and at that point I would have to assume that the market has begun the third leg down in the secular bear market that started in March of 2000.Now let me say this, bear markets don’t begin because of lines on a chart. They begin because something fundamental is broken in the economy or financial system. Now we certainly do have a broken financial system, no doubt about it, but then again this cyclical bull was never built on the foundation that we had fixed anything in the financial sector. We certainly haven't fixed anything in the economy with unemployment remaining above 15% if one counts everyone out of work. No this cyclical bull was built on a foundation of massive liquidity. I’m not convinced yet that that fundamental base is broken. Only time will tell.But even if this is a bear market rally let me assure you that bear market rallies don’t end because of lines on a chart. If you think you are going to spot a top in a bear market rally by drawing a few trend lines or some meaningless resistance level you are just kidding yourself. It ain’t gonna happen. It never has and it never will. Lines on a chart don’t halt bear market rallies anymore than they initiate bear markets.I’ll tell you exactly what halts a bear market rally. Sentiment! Sentiment, at every single one of those rallies during the `07-`09 market, reached bullish extremes. Not one single rally was halted by a pivot point or resistance level prior to sentiment reaching extreme bullish levels.Even after the recent surge, sentiment is still so depressed that it’s at levels lower than most of the intermediate bottoms during the last bear market. So let me tell you, if you think the market is going to turn tail and run because it hits the pivot at 1130 or the 200 day moving average, or because you think earnings aren’t going to be rosy, you are going to be sorely disappointed.If this truly is a bear market then before you even begin to look for a technical turning point you first have to wait until sentiment does a 180 degree turnaround. That just doesn’t happen quickly after the kind of beating we just got. Trust me, it’s going to take a while for investors to forget a 17% correction and dare to become bullish again. If I had to guess I would say at least 8 to 11 weeks. Even longer if the next half cycle (due around day 15-20 of the rally) and full daily cycle correction (due around day 35-45 of the rally) are strong enough to scare investors again.The problem with the move out of February bottom was that we got no corrections and it quickly turned into a runaway move. Those kind of rallies tend to end with some kind of mini-crash. I started telling subscribers there was a high possibility of that back in late March and early April. It happened in Feb. of '07 with the China crash and sure enough, it happened again in May with the flash crash.Traders become extremely complacent during one of these runaway moves. At the April top sentiment had reached levels more bullish than at the top of the last bull market. As usual, we paid a heavy price for that complacency. But now we've swung 180 degrees back in the other dierection, with sentiment so depressed it even makes the `09 bottom look positively giddy. That my friends is the base for another powerful rally.Actually I won't be at all surprised if the market rallies back to new highs ... even if we have begun the initial topping process of this cyclical bull. Remember the bear market had already begun in the summer of `07 but that didn't stop it from rallying back up to marginal new highs in Oct. before finally rolling over into the second worst bear market in history.This idea that the markets can somehow magically look into the future is just ludicrous. I can assure you no one can see the future, and that includes the millions and millions of investors that make up the global markets.Now let me say this - we already know where the cancer is. Does that mean the stock market will now start to discount the next bear market? In the summer of `07 we knew the cancer was in the credit markets, initially beginning in the subprime mortgage market. Did the market look into the future and discount the unraveling of the global credit markets at that time? No it did not. The stock market rallied to new highs.Well, we already know what will eventually bring this house of cards down, it's already started just like it had already started in the summer of `07. We are going to have one sovereign debt implosion after another and that is going to lead to the cancer spreading through the global currency markets eventually infecting the world's reserve currency.But don't expect the market to look ahead and begin discounting the unraveling of the global currency markets. Markets don't do that. What they do is slowly recognize the fact that the fundamentals are broken. Once enough traders realize that, the markets begin to roll over, usually in an extended process taking many months.I doubt this time will be any different, especially since the central banks of the world are going to fight the bear with a blizzard of paper. Don't make the mistake of thinking the markets have to act rationally. They don't and won't. If the Fed prints enough money markets are going to rise even though the global economy is crumbling all around us. If you are bearish and determined to pit your stash against Ben's printing press I'm afraid you are signing up for one very difficult time ahead. I seriously doubt we are going to see another credit market implosion like we saw in `08. Without a severe dislocation like that there will be no market crash this time. When the bear does return (and he will eventually) the next leg down is going to be a long drawn out process with multiple violent bear market rallies. Selling short in that kind of market isn't going to be easy. As a matter of fact I doubt 1 bear in 10 will even manage to make money in that kind of environment.Bear's should be careful what they wish for. I suspect the next leg of the secular bear will manage to destroy both bulls and bears alike.
- WHAT'S HAPPENING? First off a little history to dispel some myths. I've know that the head & shoulders pattern that everyone is afraid of doesn't actually hold up to testing being little better than a coin toss. Well Jason Goephert of Sentimentrader.com actually ran the data and it's much worse than a coin toss. The percentage of times the pattern reached it's target was 27% for an average return of -1.2%. Not exactly a great risk/reward setup. Like most of these technical patterns that people take as gospel The H&S pattern when examined under the microscope of history rarely lives up to it's reputation.Now you see why I don't put a lot of emphasis in lines on a chart. Most of the time they are just... lines on a chart!Here is what is happening. Roughly every 20-22 weeks the market dips into a major intermediate cycle low. The cycle tends to shorten a bit in bear markets simply because humans can't remain negative as long as we can stay positive. In either case our emotions become exhausted and need to take a break.We are now 21 weeks into the cycle that began at the Feb. low (22 if this week ends up moving below last weeks intraweek low).The same thing is happening in the gold market.Just like February I expect both cycles will bottom in tandem. At that point gold should take off into the final leg up of the ongoing C-wave. The stock market is another question altogether. We are in a secular bear market after all and the stock market could bounce out of the coming cycle low and fail to make new highs before rolling over again. If that happens then yes I will call the bear market. But I'm just not prepared to call it as we move into the final ultra negative period of an intermediate cycle low. We simply have to see what kind of bounce develops out of the coming bottom first.
- CYCLE BOTTOM? I've been waiting for a swing low to mark the daily cycle bottom and likely the intermediate cycle low also.As long as we close positive today we will have that swing. (We will also have a four day rule possible trend change) I think there's a very high probability that Thursday marked the bottom.Folks this is just how intermediate cycle bottoms unfold. They always make everyone believe the decline will continue forever. They always bring out the calls for a crash. And they always bring out the trolls on this blog :) The thing is they also always eventually bottom. Then the market rallies long enough to reverse sentiment back to bullish extremes. In bull markets that means new highs. In bear markets the fundamentals pull the market back down before new highs can be made.Once I become convinced we have indeed put in the intermediate cycle low (a pretty good tell is when the bears start blaming the rally on the PPT. A sure sign they got caught short at the bottom) then the bounce out of that low will tell us whether we are back in a bear market, or whether this has just been a correction in a cyclical bull.If the market rolls over and moves below the intermediate low (which appears to be at 1014 if the swing holds) then yes the markets are back in bear mode. If we go back up and make new highs...well that would be obvious now wouldn't it?So the next month or two should tell us the true direction of the market.
Market Skeptics
- The Disappearing Dollars Fed admits dollars disappearing(emphasis mine) [my comment]Fed admits dollars disappearingStar-News - Google News Archive - Feb 11, 1986WASHINGTON — A lot of U.S. greenbacks can’t be accounted for.A study has concluded that $136 billion in U.S. currency — 88 percent of the total circulation—is missing.In a comprehensive look at personal money-handling habits, Federal Reserve Board economists concluded that individuals over age 18 are holding $18 billion in U.S. coins and cash. That is about $100 per person.That is, however, only 12 percent of the $153.9 billion of cash supposedly in circuiatAon. Where is the rest?“I wish we knew where it was.” said Paul A. Spindt, a Fed economist and one of the authors of the study.Fed economists know that part of it is in the cash drawers of legitimate businesses and some Is held by people under age 18. Neither group was included in the Fed survey.Spindt said he doubted, however, whether the amount held by youngsters and businesses would total more than 15 percent. That leaves nearly three-fourths of U.S. currency missing in action.One explanation is that part of the missing money is being u8ed in the “underground” economy, populated by those intent on evading income taxes by dealing on a cash- only basis.This explanation, however, would account for only part of the funds, because even ill-gotten gains flow back into general circulation at some point.Other studies have speculated that as much as one-third to two-thirds of U.S. currency winds up in foreign hands. The Fed economists made no estimate of how much has gone overseas, but speculated that a big part of the money is, indeed, being used by foreigners who would rather deal in the stable U.S. currency than In their own currencies.“We do know that there are some very large shipments of U.S. currency going offshore to various destinations around the world,” Spindt said.This money often ends up in areas with high inflation rates. In some Latin American nations, for instance, the citizens exchange local currency on the black market for dollars as a hedge against their own currency’s being devalued.The study, published in this month’s Federal Reserve Bulletin, has important implications for the central bank in its efforts to control growth of the nation’s money supply.The basic measure of money known as M1, is defined as currency in circulation and checking accounts. The $153.9 billion estimate for the amount of currency in circulation accounts for about one-fourth of the M-1 total.If it turns out that a great deal of this money is no longer in the United States, the growth targets the Fed sets for M-1 would have to be adjusted.The study concluded that the amount of currency in circulation, the $18 billion held by Individuals, is changing hands more rapidly than had been estimated. The study estimated this money was spent and replenished at a rate of about $420 per adult a month.This turnover of money is known as velocity. In recent years it has failed to perform as policymakers had expected, blunting the effect of Fed efforts to manage money growth.The study said 14 percent of American families operate on a cash-only basis but most family finances are handled through checking accounts which covered 57 per cent of all family spending.The study said 42 percent of families have cards for automated bank teller machines but only 30 percent of families used the cards in the month before the survey.The survey on financial patterns among U.S. families was conducted for the Fed from May to August 1984 by the Survey Research Center of the University of Michigan. which Interviewed 1,946 families.“We need to take a more careful look at how money is being used in the economy,” Spindt said. He said the authors of the report are recommending that the survey of cash be repeated on a regular basis to get a more accurate reading of peoples use of money.Confidence in the dollar was collapsing going into the 1980s (see some of my other entries), so why was the share of dollars held abroad increasing? Answer: Iran-Contra…In the 1980's this meant cocaine producers routed their product through the privileged CIA-protected La Corporacion-Cali-Noriega-Contra coke pipeline, with a commensurate increase in volume and drop in prices (mentioned above). This was a monetary pipeline as well, with the producer economies receiving infusions of hard American currency. In that sense one commodity, cocaine, flowed north while another kind of commodity flowed south: hard currency. ……With that statement in mind, consider these quotes from ex-DEA agents like Michael Levine and Cellerino Castillo: "For decades, the CIA, the Pentagon, and secret organizations like Oliver North's Enterprise have been supporting and protecting the world's biggest drug dealers.... The Contras and some of their Central American allies ... have been documented by DEA as supplying ... at least 50 percent of our national cocaine consumption. They were the main conduit to the United States for Colombian cocaine during the 1980's. The rest of the drug supply ... came from other CIA-supported groups, such as DFS (the Mexican CIA) ... [and] other groups and/or individuals like Manual Noriega." (Ex-DEA agent Michael Levine: The Big White Lie: The CIA and the Cocaine/Crack Epidemic)
- Spending Our Way To Prosperity Link Between Federal Deficits And Money Supply GrowthIn the graph below, you can clearly see the link between Federal deficits and money supply growth. Notice the yellow Monetary base rise (yellow line) in proportion to the each major federal deficits (blue line).Link Between Federal Deficits And Money Supply GrowthThe graph below shows the link between government deficits and inflation pre1980. The surge in inflation after each major deficit is crystal clear.However, in 1982 the link is brokenThe government still prints moneyThe disconnect can be seen in this long term graph comparing the growth of the US monetary base and historic inflation rates.The next graph shows the disconnect even more clearly. The US money supply growth accelerates after 1982, while inflation slows down.EVERYTHING GETS BETTER (sarcasm) Deficits explode out of control and inflation/interest rates fallUnemployment dropped like a rockThe Dow rallies sharplyInterest rates fallAfter decades of fighting high interest, Congress phases out regulation Q (interest rate ceilings), and interest rates fall.Gold prices crashAfter decades of fighting gold prices, US stops regular gold sales. Gold prices then crash.We're Spending Our Way To ProsperityWe’re spending our way to prosperityStar-News - Google News Archive - Jan 24, 1998We might not have known everything there was to know about world economics 10 years ago. but we knew this much: The American century was over; Japan was the wave of the future. The evidence was overwhelming. Nine of the 10 biggest banks in the world were Japanese, Japan carried a huge trade surplus with us, the yen was replacing the dollar as the world’s strongest currency and the Japanese were buying up American icons like Rockefeller Center. Not only that, they made better cars than we did, their kids studied harder than ours did and their crime rate was lower.American CEOs were practicing their bow from the waist, in preparation for greeting their new masters.There was a reason for all of this, of course: the Japanese knew how to save. They had the highest savings rate in the world, while we, as a nation, hardly saved anything at all. We were the flibbertigibbet grasshoppers, putting life on a credit card; the Japanese were the purposeful ants, saving for the future. Slowly but surely they were overtaking us in productivity, standard of living and just about everything else.And it wasn’t just Japan, either. All of the Asian economics were going great guns. South Korea, indonesia, Hong Kong. even China had growth rates several times ours. I hey were all outsavrng us, outgrowing us; it was only a matter of time before we’d go the way of Britain, a once-first-class power living in past glory.That was then. The story now is a little different. The Asian economics, awash in corruption we now find, are experiencing a crisis that suggests total collapse. Indonesia is a basket case; South Korea isn’t any better and Japan stands trembling in the winds of change. The Western economics are scrambling to get together multibillion-dollar bailout packages for the former Asian miracle-workers. We are no longer afraid of them overtaking us; we’re afraid that if they go down, they’ll take us with them. Our stock market is looking over its shoulder even as it sinks.What’s the problem? Funny you should ask.The problem, it is generally agreed, is that Japan saves too much. Rather than spend its money on itself in a way that would stimulate its economy and encourage its citizens to buy goods from its struggling neighbors, thereby helping them back on their feet, it just continues to save and save. The Japanese economy has been in the tank for more than six years and they have yet to come up with an aggressive stimulus package.Spend! we tell them. Buy a new TV set, take a vacation, borrow some money. Live a little. Be a grasshopper. But it is not in their nature.We, on the other hand, are enjoying the best economy we’ve had in years — low unemployment, high profits, trivial inflation — all fueled by our willingness to go deeply into debt in the cause of immediate gratification. Consumer confidence we call it and we’re doing great, so long as the Japanese don’t screw it up with their puritanical attitudes toward consumption.Actually, this entire matter is merely proof of something I’ve known for years, but have been un’ able to convince my wife of: Saving is a dangerous habit and should he kept under strict control. Oh, I don’t mind a little social saving, on special occasions, but that save- something-out-of-every-dollar sort of saving should be avoided at all costs. It’s too addictive.I’ve known people who saved all their lives for retirement and put aside a pretty good pile. Then, when they finally retired, they couldn’t spend the money. They wanted to keep on saving. They’d neglected their spendthrift habits, you see.Which has never been one of my problems. When I was a young reporter I made next to nothing. Considering I had a wife and two kids, it was less than nothing. But through all those awful years, I never failed to spend more than I made.As a matter of fact, I generally spent in one year what I would make in the following year. When my wife would complain that we were always in debt, I would point out that our income was merely running a year behind us.It worked out. …This is part of section 2 of paper. nearly done.-------------Below are the 21 sections of the major article I am working on.Section 01: =====INTRO=====Section 02: =====1982 Disconnect=====Section 03: =====BREAKING THE PSYCHOLOGY OF INFLATION=====Section 04: =====THE US TREASURY'S WAR ON GOLD=====Section 05: =====Social security and democracy's warped incentives=====Section 06: =====FIGHTING THE FREE MARKET (AND LOSING)=====Section 07: =====FOREBEARANCE-Choosing The Lingering Disease=====Section 08: =====FINANCIAL INNOVATION + POLITICAL INTERFERENCE=====Section 09: =====The US Ponzi Scheme=====Section 10: =====Dismantling the free market=====Section 11: =====AMERICA'S TRANSFORMATION INTO A GIANT BUCKET SHOP=====Section 12: =====THE EXCHANGE STABILIZATION FUND=====Section 13: =====MANIPULATION=====Section 14: =====SUICIDAL CHEAP FOOD POLICIES=====Section 15: ===== BREAKING THE MEDIA=====Section 16: =====DOLLARIZING THE WORLD===== (the major fraud I haven't written about yet. (Hint: Iran-Contra wasn't about the cocaine, the contras, or the guns. It was about the dollar. If not for Iran-Contra, the dollar would have collapsed back in 1982. )Section 17: =====FOREBEARANCE=====Section 18: =====SPREADING MORAL DECAY=====Section 19: =====Looting the Europe===== (the last fraud)Section 20: =====Reaching the breaking point=====Section 21: =====US on verge of a disconnect=====
- The US Is Experiencing A Massive Grasshoppers Infestation Idaho's NewsChannel 7 reports to expect grasshopper outbreak in Idaho this year.(emphasis mine) [my comment]Expect grasshopper outbreak in Idaho this yearby Nishi GuptaJuly 19, 2010 at 10:14 PM[Idaho]BOISE -- Agriculture experts predict there will be an outbreak of grasshoppers in the state this year with some areas, including the Treasure Valley, reporting more of the insects than usual.And that means they could be eating their way through our crops.No one is really clear why there are so many grasshoppers right now. One theory is they're popping up in parts that haven't really been treated by insecticide before.…Mary Rohlfing says the insects are starting to show up on her Ada County farm."From our own observations we're seeing a lot more of them. Right now they're kind of small, they're only an inch or so long. But next month is probably going to be bit of a challenge," said Rohlfing.…Because of the crop damage they cause, controlling grasshoppers is a priority for the state.Agricultural workers have been busier than usual visiting property owners who complain of seeing too many of the insects.Threats are being reported in several counties: from northern Idaho to the southeast, and now even in Ada and Elmore Counties."Right now it’s atypical for Elmore county. We have not had this many calls from Elmore for about 3 or 4 years. Ada county -- it's not typical because we're getting more calls this year south of the freeway in Ada county. We didn't expect that many calls this year," said Dick Lawson of the Idaho Department of Agriculture.…Rapid City Journal reports about Heavy outbreak of grasshoppers at work on West River fields.Heavy outbreak of grasshoppers at work on West River fieldsJomay Steen, Journal staff Posted: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 6:00 am[South Dakota]Every morning Doug Hlavka surveys the damage that a newly hatched plague of grasshoppers has set upon his cornfield and pastures.“This is the worst infestation that I’ve ever seen,” Hlavka said.The eastern Meade County rancher had contracted to have his field sprayed Monday, but a rainstorm rolled through the area postponing any field work until later.Hlavka, 56, noticed the first hatchings about two weeks ago. The hoppers quickly moved into his pastures and fields to begin their ravenous work, he said.“I lost 40 acres of alfalfa that I didn’t cut. I had 80 acres of corn that they’re eating up real fast. I’ve sprayed around its edges, but I’m waiting for an airplane to spray it,” he said.His wife, Val, lost her flower and vegetable gardens to the insects. He estimates that in certain areas on his ranch, there are 30 grasshoppers resting on each square foot of land. They have covered the sides of his home, outbuildings and fence posts.“My mother’s 84, and she says they’re the worst she’s ever seen,” Hlavka said.David Heck, Lawrence County Invasive Species coordinator, said grasshoppers have been increasing their populations successively each cycle in Lawrence County for the past three years. They started hatching about three weeks ago, Heck said.“Last year was the worst since I’ve been here since 2000,” Heck said. “It’s looking the same for this year.”They are seeing more grasshoppers where they don’t typically range such as the foothills of the Black Hills and Spearfish. The grasshoppers are spread throughout the county’s plains areas including St. Onge as well as the Butte and Wyoming borders.“I’ve been hearing the grasshopper populations are bad in Butte County,” he said.…“There’s a lot of forage and feed for the grasshoppers to feed on right now,” Guffey said. There haven’t been a lot of complaints, but there are definitely grasshoppers out there, he said.In Pennington County, grasshoppers have moved in off the range and are getting into the croplands. The Wall area has been the first to report grasshoppers, he said.…Record Times reports that Grasshopper levels at all-time high.Grasshopper levels at all-time high Posted: Wednesday, Jul 14th, 2010BY: Amanda Fry, Staff Writer[Wyoming]Throughout the Wyoming and several other western states, grasshopper populations are at an all time high, and the problem could linger in coming years, according to Larry Yost of the Platte County Weed and Pest Department.Yost said the department recently sprayed 324,000 acres of land in the County in a recent program for landowners to try and prevent heavy grasshopper outbreaks on their land.With the help of federal grants, landowners were able to spray a pesticide, Dimilin 2L, on their land for $1.25 per acre, and Yost said the effects of the chemical will be seen in coming days.Yost emphasized that the chemical will not be effective until approximately 14 days after application.On average, Yost said grasshopper levels range from 40 to 60 insects per square foot, with higher concentrations seeing from 100 to 200 per square foot. Yost said in one area, however, there was an average of 2,000 grasshoppers per square foot, although this is not a typical situation.“I’d never seen anything like that,” Yost said. He noted that in 1995, the highest level of grasshoppers he recorded was near Guernsey, with 140 per square foot.Part of the high grasshopper population, Yost said, is due to the fact that the insects’ population is cyclic. He said the current grasshopper boom falls approximately 70 years from the “Dirty Thirties,” a period of time in the late 1930’s and early 1940’s, when grasshoppers plagued the area.Yost said while grasshopper peaks such as this last approximately 3 years, they can last up to 5 years, or even longer. He also noted that the situation surrounding the current grasshopper population is not typical.…Cass-news reports that Grasshoppers starting to ruin crops, gardens.Grasshoppers starting to ruin crops, gardensWednesday, Jul 14, 2010 - 04:28:07 pm CDT[Nebraska]LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) — Grasshoppers are already starting to damage yards and gardens in parts of Nebraska, so homeowners should watch out for signs of the hungry insects.…Hernando Today reports that grasshopper infestation gives local farmers anxiety.Grasshopper infestation gives local farmers anxietyBy HAYLEY MATHIS[Florida]A recent infestation of American grasshoppers is creating a problem for local farmers.Stacey Strickland, county extension director and agriculture agent, said he is trying to help farmers maintain their crops with the recent grasshopper infestation that has mostly taken place off Power Line Road near State Road 50 heading east.Strickland said the grasshoppers have swarmed in the thousands and are eating hay and other crops.…Federal Inaction Causes Epic Grasshopper OutbreaksI explained about the looming Grasshopper disaster two months ago.… In 1931, grasshopper swarms were reported to be so thick that they blocked out the sun. These swarming grasshoppers ate everything fenceposts, clothing hanging on clotheslines, and even the paint off buildings. Fields were left devastated, totally stripped of all vegetation.Timing of Epic grasshopper outbreaks is not a coincidenceNotice the timing of the last truly epic grasshopper infestation: 1931, right in the middle of the great depression. THIS IS NOT AN ACCIDENT. During economic downturns, farmers and governments cut corners in their preventative spending, allowing pest infestations to reach levels they normally never could. This inaction is the true cause behind spectacular pest outbreaks.A search of Google archive news for Grasshoppers, confirms the theory. The story below is from 1931.US Has No Funds For War On Grasshoppers In Mid-West (1931)U.S. Has No Funds For War On Grasshoppers In Mid-WestAlthough Serious Damage Is Reported, Agriculture Department Official Says Appropriation Is For Research OnlyThe Sun - Jul 25, 1931The Agriculture Department repeated today that it had no funds with which to undertake the eradication of grasshoppers the heavily infested States pf Nebraska and South Dakota. …Is News of Grasshopper Infestation being suppressed?I found the story below through google news on Monday. However, it has now disappeared from Google news (See Google news results for "Idaho Farmers Concerned Over Grasshoppers").KIVI-TV TODAY'S 6 NEWS reports that Idaho Farmers Concerned Over GrasshoppersIdaho Farmers Concerned Over Grasshoppers"Grasshoppers! Everywhere!" That's the cry we are starting to hear at our Today's Channel 6 newsroom Assignment desk….Viewers calling in saying it's getting bad out there…So we called the USDA and -- get this -- they say they haven't seen a grasshopper infestation this large since the late 90's! …My reaction: As expected, the US is experiencing a massive Grasshoppers infestation. Crop damage is inevitable. Mainstream media is completely ignoring this story.
- Leading Chinese Economists Urge Government To Dump U.S. T... Prison Planet reports that Leading Chinese Economists Urge Government To Dump U.S. Treasuries and Buy Gold.(emphasis mine) [my comment]Leading Chinese Economists Urge Government To Dump U.S. Treasuries, Buy Gold Fears reemerge that China could resort to “nuclear option” Steve WatsonPrisonplanet.comMonday, Jul 19th, 2010Prominent economists in China are calling for their government to ditch vast holdings of U.S. Treasuries in favour of tangible assets such as gold, a move that would have a far reaching impact on the economy.Reuters reports that Yu Yongding, a former academic adviser to the Chinese central bank has appealed to state representatives to move away from U.S. debt and invest in assets denominated in other currencies, as well as other financial instruments and real goods.“Although assets in other currencies and forms are not an ideal replacement for U.S. Treasury bonds, diversification should be a basic principle,” Yu wrote in the China Securities Journal.“When demand for U.S. Treasury securities is strong, it’s a rare opportunity for us to gradually pull back. That way, it will not have a big impact on prices and China will not suffer too much,” he said.Another influential financial expert, Zhang Monan, of the powerful think tank The State Information Center, also commented to the journal that China should replace increasing amounts of its foreign exchange reserves with hard assets such as gold.The move could send gold prices back toward record highs following a recent slide.China holds the world’s largest stockpile of reserves, worth some $2.5 trillion.China cut its U.S. treasury holdings by $32.5 billion in May, yet it still holds $867.7 billion, making it the largest holder of U.S. government debt in the world.In the past China has repeatedly threatened to use the so called “nuclear option” and liquidate its vast holding of US treasuries in response to continued pressure on the Communist state to force a yuan revaluation. Such an event could trigger a dollar crash which would now have disastrous consequences for an American economy mired in recession.Such an eventuality could lead to runaway inflation, making the cost of living unaffordable to even middle class Americans as food prices skyrocket.Further reports have suggested that Senior Chinese military officers have proposed selling U.S. bonds en mass as a way of “punishing” Washington.China’s central bank has also previously supported calls for a new supra-national global currency to replace the dollar, and earlier this year strongly signaled that the country will move away from pegging its currency to the dollar.My reaction: With the imminent threat of dollar’s collapse, it’s funny how little panic there is.
- section on gold --------------------------------This is the section on gold, which still needs explanations, but is otherwise done.--------------------------------gold as an inflation hedge… it is little wonder that gold has been chosen in most nations as an inflation hedge. South African gold marketers — in an attempt to sell the popular South African rand, a coin, containing precisely one troy ounce of gold — trace the march of inflation 400 year back.Specifically, between 1560 and 1974, the South Africans say that the cost of living increased by 7,653 per cent. During that period, they say, the price of gold increased by 7,690 per cent. Says a proposed ad, “you could call it a good hedge against inflation.”…----------------------------------------------------------------Dollar Crisis WeatheredDollar Crisis WeatheredMilwaukee Journal - Google News Archive - Sep 18, 1962A mood of cautious optimism about the dollar appears to prevail at this week’s meetings of the international Monetary Fund (IMF) and World bank in Washington.The world’s money managers and financial experts are being told that the key currency is in better shape than it has been in two years. The root difficulty—the persistent deficit in this country’s international balance of payments—is becoming less severe. By the end of next year, the Kennedy administration hopes to eliminate the deficit completely. This would slow down or halt increases in foreign holdings of dollars.The current good health of the dollar is a partial tribute to the new spirit of co-operation in international monetary circles. The United States now can turn to foreign central banks and fiscal authorities for help in easing the damaging shifts of capital between countries. Foreign banks have established a gold pool to fight speculation on the London gold market. The IMF stands ready to use its reserves to help cushion the dollar if the United States should suddenly be hit by an outflow of short term funds. All of these measures help maintain calm and stability in the international money markets.The battle of the dollar is not won, however. The American economy has yet to prove that it can grow at a rate fast enough to restore complete confidence in the currency. This involves keeping the lid on inflation, maintaining a favorable trade balance, winning greater access to new markets in wester Europe.…See Federal Reserve Archival System results for London "gold pool"Quiet Pooling Of Resources Stabilizes The Gold MarketQuiet Pooling of Resources Stabilizes the Gold MarketFort Scott Tribune - Google News Archive - Feb 26, 1963By SAM DAWSO?’AP Businss News AnalystNEW YORK (AP) United States money transactions with the rest of the world have taken a turn for the worse in recent months. But there’s been nothing that could be called a new raid on its gold reserves, Times have changed.… the stability of gold and the evident strength of the dollar in world financial markets is cause of considerable satisfaction.Much of the thanks goes to the group of central bankers, American and foreigners, who have rigged up a device to halt the raids that in the past unsettled one or another currency and for a brief period put the American dollar under strain to the surprise of most Americans who thought it as good as gold.The group acts quietly. In fact, American money managers have never officially said the United States was taking part. But the success of this quiet pooling of international financial resources to protect currencies against the stress of temporary ups and downs of trade and financial balances shows plainly in the stable gold market as reported daily from London. This week prices have been below $35.08 an ounce, making any buying of U.S. government gold unprofitable.This very real, if officially unannounced, international gold pool keeps the London free market stable simply by buying when the price is below the official U.S. Treasury figure. When the price goes above that figure the pool can step in and sell.This swells the amount of gold available and as the supply goes up the demand is met and the price returns to the desired level.The pool doesn’t pretend it can protect the dollar forever if the balance of payments deficit keeps mounting. That is why the United States has taken many measures to boost the total U.S. exports on one hand and to discourage the outflow of dollars on the other. The measures have fallen short of their goal.…Gold Still Drains OffGold Still Drains OffMiami News - Google News Archive - Jul 6, 1965VAS11iNGTON — Private gold hoarding and speculation in the first quarter of this year drained off nil the newly mined gold and an estimated $250 million from official monetary reserves as well.…Most of this drain almost certainly occurred through the operations of the gold "pool" in London. Acting for a group of the leading financial nations the Bank of England controls the London gold market, selling to hold down the price when demand is heavy and buying for the account of the pool when demand is light.The Bank of England uses newly mined gold from South Africa for its sales and can also call upon the official reserves of the members of the pool when necessary. The United States’ share in the pool is 50 per cent.Thus it is probable that upwards of $100 million of the U. S. gold loss this year has gone straight into the hands of gold speculators, not into other countries’ reserves.Gold speculation was heavy in the early months this year, largely because the crisis of the British pound led to fears of a general currency upheaval, including fears of a devaluation of the dollar. A dollar devaluation means an increase in the price of gold.…Gold Data: Lesson in Artful DodgingGold Data: Lesson in Artful DodgingWall Street Journal - Aug 1, 1967By RICHARD F. JANSSENWASHINGTON -- "In this business, you have to choose between lying to people or scaring them to death.” The speaker isn’t a doctor or a nuclear bomb expert but a Johnson Administration official coping with the balance of payments problem. His choice is usually clear: Don’t public or more pertinently the nervous bankers abroad who could cash in their dollars and touch off a run on the nation’s gold supply...…Illustrating the uncertainty among outside analysts is this year’s decision of the New York based National Foreign Trade Council to halt its long practice of forecasting of payments deficit. Instead the respected council estimated most components individually and stopped right there cautioning that it no longer dared predict such items as the dollar inflows.…AII the shadowy activities revolve around the persistent payments deficit—which has as foreigners acquired more dollars than they returned to the U.S. … With $29 billion of foreign owned dollars stacked up as potential claims on $13.2 billion gold stock figure, they have ample reason for what's left as best unsaid...Since international high finance is so subtle, ... the dilemma rarely has to be resolved with the outright lie either. Instead the Administration is ever more shrewdly guarding the dollar’s value abroad and intelligence about it through little known techniques that range from doublecounting gold bars to tinkering with of otherwise routine Government securities. The result is a web of statistics that mask almost as much they display about the dollar outflow.… Some of this double counting dates back to the 1950s when the IMF made gold investments in interest earning short-term Treasury securities. The fund can reclaim this $800 million gold whenever it wants. And 5228 million more is gold the U.S sold outright for dollars in the last year or so to smaller nations so they in turn could make their mandatory quota payments to the IMF. Swiftly before these show up in Government data, the IMF restored this gold to the Treasury as a special deposit. The purpose was clearly by both parties. Mitigation of the original sales effect on the U.S. statistics…Only a discreet footnote following in Government statistical publications brings these double countings to light. But because they were openly announced when they were initiated, Washington officials contend they aren’t really deceptive...…Happily for officials anxious to put the best face on the figures, there’s no simple standard for deciding just what is a dollar going into foreign hands and thus swelling the payments deficit. Few of them are greenbacks carried out of the country the basic measure comes from major banks reports of how foreigners checking accounts went up or down during a reporting period. These dollar deposits are considered liquid liabilities. Also counting as liquid liabilities are the dollars foreigners invest in most Treasury securities regardless of their maturity and dollars they invest in other Federal securities and bank certificates of deposit having original maturities of less than one year. But the self-imposed accounting standards that class these as liquid liabilities are sterner than those in most other nations, so Administration men argue that it’s not dishonest to bend events around them to America's best advantage. Thus it was that, because a single day’s added maturity would make these short-term investments count as a favorable dollar inflow, a recent a 400 million debenture offer by the Federal National Mortgage Association appeared with maturity of one year and two days. If foreigners should chance to buy some it would help rather than hurt the payments position.Privately foreign financial officials are delighted to see Walther Lederer, the Department's chief payments economist, persistently pointing out that there’s no real advantage for the U.S. in getting foreigners to put dollars in securities that are just barely over an arbitrary line. The Treasury is very clever but Walther spoils it by being so honest one embassy aide snickers.… foreign purchases of such securities aren’t being left entirely to chance. Other governments are frequently coaxed to rechannel their dollar investments into the most statistically soothing forms. It's partly because the Treasury can quietly arrange such investments at the last minute before a balance of payments reporting period ends of course that forecasting the deficits has become so much less attractive to private predictors. In the first 1967 quarter for instance it was largely a spate of foreign official purchases that spared the Government from having to report a deficit close to $900 million instead the figure was roughly $540 million...It's not all arm-twisting a State Department official insists arguing that interest rates on short-term Federal securities and bank certificates of deposit have been high enough to inspire such purchases voluntarily. Even so, the growing awareness in Washington that pressures are applied makes the topic a sensitive one.…Discreet DissemblingThe discreet dissembling is squarely in the public interest officials are convinced. To give the world a glimpse at raw payments deficit figures for just a single month or at one day’s actual gold outflow they argue could prove disastrous. While U.S. authorities might take an immensely adverse number calmly knowing a big inflow is on the way, such a figure might so frighten outsiders that greater exodus of dollars would result.…Even a prominent private financier who helped create the Government's dollar defenses confesses that he can’t tell anymore what our balance of payments trend is. Since he has left Washington ho says the dodges have become even more artful. The Treasury's credibility problem is becoming terrible...Us Looked To For More Gold ActionU.S. Looked To For More Gold ActionDaytona Beach Morning Journal - Google News Archive - Dec 18, 1967LONDON (AP) — Financial experts in London looked to the United States Sunday for measures to halt panic buying of gold, which is expected here to continue in the world’s bullion markets.…The London experts expressed doubt of U.S. ability to stem the flood of buying orders which have poured in on all bullion markets since Britain’s Nov. 18 devaluation of the pound.Authoritative estimates put the amount of the metal that has moved out since then through the international gold pool in London at more than 1,000 tons worth about $1.1 billion.Nearly 60 per cent of that gold came from the United States.The experts explained the gold rush as a coincidence of widespread loss of faith in paper money as a result of the pound’s devaluation, inflation in much of the world, and a broad belief held by international speculators that the price of gold must rise.Some British economists and politicians add to this their feeling that President charles do Gaulle of France may have had a hand in fomenting the gold rush. The French, however, strenuously deny this.France withdrew from active participation in the eight-nation international gold pool, which operates out of London, in June when Paris refused to supply more gold. The pool was set tip in 1961 to stabilize the gold market by buying or selling the metal as needed to satisfy demand.…The dollar came under pressure Friday in Europe’s money markets, except in London, after showing strength all week despite the gold rush.The sale of dollars by European holders showed the fear of many on this side of the Atlantic that the dollar was weak because of the continuing—and increasing—deficit in the American balance of foreign payments.…The TIME article below was written in March 1968, as the "London Gold Pool" collapsed under a speculative gold stampede.Speculative StampedeFriday, Mar. 22, 1968Quietly and secretly, technicians at Fort Knox, Ky., loaded an estimated $450 million worth of gold ingots [about 410 tons of gold] onto a heavily armed convoy. The convoy proceeded to a nearby U.S. Air Force base, where the gold was loaded aboard a transport plane and flown to Britain.There, it was sent to the Bank of England, to be transported by Swissair and British European Airways flights to the coffers of Swiss banks. The influx of gold became so bulging, in fact, that one Swiss bank had to reinforce the walls of its vault to contain it. It was all part of the largest gold rush in history, a frenetic, speculative stampede that last week threatened the Western world with its greatest financial crisis since the Depression.Socks & Mattresses. Telephone and telex lines to London, the world's largest gold market, were swamped as buyers throughout Europe demanded gold, gold and more gold. More than 200 tons, or $220 million worth, changed hands on the London gold market in one day to establish a new single-day trading record. Where gold could be bought directly, mob scenes erupted and the price soared. Ten times the usual number of buyers jammed the gold pit in the cellar of the Paris Bourse, and fist fights broke out as the price on one day rose to $44.36 an ounce v. the official price of $35. In Hong Kong, frantic trading drove the price up to $40.71, and around the world investors and banks bought gold certificates and gold stocks. Many refused to accept the U.S. dollar in payment.In dozens of nations, from Austria and Italy to Sweden and Ireland, ordinary citizens rushed out to buy gold coins to stuff socks and mattresses, cleaning out numismatic stocks virtually overnight. In London, a $20 U.S. gold piece sold for $56, a £ 1 British sovereign for $10.20. In Geneva, the Swiss lined up at tellers' windows to convert their savings to gold bars. There was even a run in Hong Kong on gold jewelry. All told, between $1 billion [910 tons] and $2.5 billion [2270 tons] in gold may have changed hands within ten days in London—as much as 10% of the total gold in the seven-nation Gold Pool, whose bullion reserves are the cushion for the $35 international price of gold. No estimate was possible of all the other trading in gold around the world, except that it was colossal.Lost World? The rush was on because speculators—some avaricious, some panicky, some merely prudent—had become convinced that the U.S. and its partners could not much longer maintain the $35 price. With a balance of payments deficit of $3.6 billion last year and a war in Viet Nam that is costing some $30 billion annually, the U.S. has seen its gold reserves shrink by 50% from a postwar peak of $24.6 billion. Now, believed the speculators, the U.S. was nearing the end of its gold tether. If the U.S. could no longer sell gold to all takers at $35 an ounce and the price were allowed to rise to meet the demand, the speculators stood to make a handsome profit, just as they had in the devaluation of the pound sterling last November. Having tasted blood then, many scented another kill —and, in their wild buying, ripped and clawed at the remaining gold stocks in the Gold Pool.Who were the speculators? The identity of most was veiled in the secrecy of Swiss bankers' files, but they were situated throughout the world. Perhaps as much as 40% of Swiss bank purchases were destined for safekeeping in the coffers of Middle Eastern sheiks and oil potentates. Latin American businessmen, affluent overseas Chinese, Asian generals—all claimed a piece of the action. The central banks of many smaller nations with precarious national reserve margins, including some Communist Eastern European countries, had undoubtedly joined in to protect themselves. More in sorrow than in greed, European corporations moved into the buying to hedge their foreign-currency holdings. So did some wealthy Americans with numbered Swiss accounts, although it is illegal for U.S. citizens to own gold bullion.For the men who understood the situation best, the spectacle was appalling. "The world is lost," said London Economist John Vaizey. "A rise in the price of gold is inevitable now. It's like a grand opera of which the overture is over, and we're in the first act of a world depression." A usually unemotional Swiss banker warned that "in participating in gold speculation, capitalists are doing their best to destroy the capitalist system. If they win the battle in London, the probability is that the whole present international monetary system will come crashing down." French Economist Jacques Rueff, who has long predicted a crisis and argued for a rise in the price of gold, saw his worst jeremiads vindicated. "Whether one wants a gold price increase or not," said Rueff, "it will soon be achieved."Two-Tier Price. Finally, the pressure grew so great that the U.S. refused to continue to feed gold to satisfy speculators' greed. In a telephoned message to British Chancellor of the Exchequer Roy Jenkins, the U.S. asked Britain to close the London gold market and shut off the flow from the Gold Pool. Prime Minister Harold Wilson hurried to Buckingham Palace for a midnight meeting with Queen Elizabeth, who declared a bank holiday in foreign-exchange trading. That shut off the Gold Pool's dealing, and money markets from Singapore to Lusaka followed suit. The Paris market alone stayed open.The U.S. then invited representatives of the Gold Pool nations to Washington for a weekend conference. There was little doubt that the speculators had succeeded in wrecking at least part of the world's monetary system, and that the U.S. and the other members of the Gold Pool would no longer sell gold to all takers at $35 an ounce. What would likely be decided in Washington was a "two-tier" pricing system for gold, by which the speculators would have to conduct their transactions in a free market. …What Dollar Gold Crisis Means To YouWhat Dollar Gold Crisis Means To YouHerald-Tribune Google News Archive Mar 19, 1968By SYLVIA PORTER…Late Sunday afternoon, the leading central banks of the free world — with the conspicuous exception of France—gave their answer to the speculators who have been staging an historic run on gold in an attempt to force the U.S. to raise its officials gold price above $35 an ounce and thereby devalue the dollar. That answer, hammered out by the U.S., Belgium, the Netherlands, West Germany, italy, Switzerland, and Britain during weekend emergency meetings in Washington is The U.S. will not change the official price and quanfied foreign holders of dollars will be able to continue turning in their dollars on demand for our gold’ at $35 an ounce.…Meaning To You…Your cost of living will continue to climb to all-time peaks, though, because none of the restraints on the way can eliminate war-inspired price-wage pressures. Your dollar’s buying power will continue to sink to all-time lows.…— You will face a rising possibility of wartime price-wage credit controls. The last pretense that we can afford all the butter along with the guns was pulverized by the gold speculators last week — and Sunday our friends among the free nations made sure we realize that.— You could find buying imported goods more expensive — despite the fact that a round of tariff cuts is under way. A surtax on imports is a possibility to discourage our buying.Some of these implications to our pocketbook may seem far removed from a run on gold in markets 3000 miles away from New York, but they are in fact directly and closely connected.What HappenedFor bluntly what happened to our dollar — meaning us — last week was this:The world gave our policies abroad and at home a massive vote of no-confidence — and for the first time in our modern history, we were put on the defensive.With the help of the six nations that with us formed the now disbanded ”gold pool,” we temporarily shored up the international monetary system Sunday and bought more time for us to act to defend our dollar.Now a new transition phase in world monetary affairs opens. Now we either come through and restore confidence in the dollar by actions which count — or we invite a breakdown in the monetary system and resulting chaos.See Google archive news results for gold panic and gold rushUs To Guard GoldSlump pleases plannersU.S. to guard goldMontreal Gazette - Google News Archive - Nov 12, 1969WASHiNGTON — (DJ) — A scheme being secretively shaped here to guard the Treasury’s gold stock helps warrant the plummeting of private-market gold prices in Europe, U.S. officials said yesterday.Already, the clearly pleased planners say, inklings that it is to be forthcoming are buttressing such other factors as shadowy but sizable new South African sales in driving down the London gold price.The afternoon gold fixing price in London yesterday was $37.75, down 32½ cents from the morning and down 60 cents from Tuesday afternoon.The plan, being negotiated with financial allies, is intended to insulate the U.S. gold stock of $11,160,000,000 from a potential drain of hundreds of millions of dollars worth posed by smaller nations’ needs to contribute extra amounts of the metal to the international Monetary Fund.It is understood the broad strategy includes shortchanging the 113-country IMF on the metal itself, in return for the prospect of the IMF obtaining off-setting amounts of hard currencies several years hence.More important from the standpoint of private speculators, sources indicate, is that the operation can be carried out without bringing any newly mined gold from South Africa into official channels — and thus without damaging the two-tier gold price system.A precedent for at least one aspect of the plan, analysts note, lies in an almost unnoticed tactic employed in the previous IMF quota or contribution increase initiated in 1965. Likely to be repeated with some variation as one part of a multifaceted effort in 1970, they say, are dealings along these lines:Denmark, for example, finds that it can’t comply with the rule requiring that 25 per cent of its quota increase must be in gold (75 per cent is regularly in a country’s own currency) unless it buys gold from someone else. Usually the U.S. Treasury would be the source since the U.S. underpins the value of the dollar by generally standing ready to pay out gold in return for dollars from other governments at the fixed price of $35 an ounce.If Denmark turned to South Africa, it would violate the March 1968 pact intended to freeze the total gold holdings of all governments and official institutions at their existing level, while leaving the private market to receive all the fresh supply at a freely-moving price.Instead of taking either of these system-weakening avenues, Denmark would turn to the IMF for a loan, receiving for instance German marks. Denmark would use the marks to buy gold at the official price from the German government and deposit the gold with the IMF, thereby meeting its obligation.But the IMF would sell the gold right back to Germany in return for marks, thus replenishing its holdings of that currency.The Steady Ebb Of ConfidenceThe steady ebb of confidenceSydney Morning Herald - Google News Archive - Aug 15, 1971From PETER LONG in LONDONIt is as difficult to operate a monetary system with a low level of confidence as it is to with a roast beef candle.The turmoil in currency and gold markets over the past two weeks again warned that the confidence, which keeps the international monetary system sizzling, is in real danger of being snuffed out.Just as no candle means no roast beef, so no confidence, no system. In both cases the result is equally unpalatable, unless you happen to like steak tartare.…Gold Soars Again, Dollar Still SlumpingGold soars again, U.S. dollar takes beatingPittsburgh Press - Google News Archive - May 15, 1973LONDON — (AP-UPT) — Speculation that the Watergate scandals may force President Nixon to resign helped drive the U.S. dollar to record lows in Europe yesterday and pushed gold prices to all-time highs.The dollar plunged to new lows in Paris, Frankfurt, Zurich and Oslo. It weakened in other European centres, but in late trading there was a slight improvement in dollar rates, cutting a small fraction off the day’s losses.Gold rocketed $7 an ounce in the first hour of trading, setting record prices of $113 an ounce in Zurich and $112.50 an ounce in London, the two biggest bullion markets in the world. The metal held nearly all the gain, closing at $112 an ounce in both centres.Dealers called the gold and money markets extremely nervous…CONFIDENCE LOWDealers here and on the continent suggested that even without the speculation on Nixon’s future, confidence in the U.S. dollar was at a low ebb any way.“Name me a single reason why the dollar should be stronger,” a Zurich banker said.Market sources agreed confidence in the twice-devalued dollar has been sapped by fears of a new inflationary pressure in the United States, the continuing U.S. balance of payments deficit, and concern that Watergate has weakened Nixon’s ability to bring off trade and monetary reforms.Gold and dollar markets are related. Investors lacking confidence in the dollar have been getting out of the U.S. currency and buying gold.…Us Stabilizing World Gold PricesU.S. Stabilizing World Gold PricesOcala Star-Banner - Google News Archive - Jun 9, 1975WASHiNGTON (AP) — Virtually overnight, the United States has become almost self-sufficient in gold and able to exert considerable influence over world gold prices.The development has been at least partially responsible for a decline in world gold prices from a peak of $199 an ounce late last year to around $165 an ounce recently.In addition, the United States has not needed to import any gold so far this year, compared with net imports of about 4.5 million ounces in 1974.The supply of gold that has made the United States self-sufficient has come from the U.S. Treasury, which possesses the world’s largest gold stockpile. Treasury officials say a government gold auction later this month will help reduce the amount of imports and thus help keep U.S. dollars from flowing out of the country.…The gold, accumulated over the years, formerly was the government’s chief monetary asset and used to back up U.S. currency and to settle international debts.The treasury held its first public gold auction last January, a few days after Americans received the right to own gold for the first time in more than 40 years.The treasury has scheduled another gold auction for June 30 when it hopes to sell 500,000 oun ces and officials say additional auctions may be held.Without any more sales of treasury gold, the United States might need to import 2.5 million ounces during the remainder of this year, officials said.Since the United States traditionally has purchased about 15 to 20 per cent of the annual world supply of gold, the elimination of U.S. gold purchases on world markets for even the past six months has had a depressing effect on prices.See Google archive news results for treasury gold auctionsUs Boosts Gold Sales To Strengthen Its Dollar .U.S. boosts gold sales to strengthen its dollarMontreal Gazette - Google News Archive - Aug 23, 1978WASHINGTON (AP) — The government took its second major step in less than a week to support the U.S. dollar yesterday by announcing plans to sell three million more ounces of gold from its stockpile.The sale is intended to bring more money into the US, and reduce the country’s balance-of-payments deficit, which is a major cause of the dollar’s decline. it is also intended to reduce U.S. Imports of gold.…The decline of the dollar overseas worries economists because it contributes to inflation in the US and weakens the dollar as a worldwide currency.The dollar has lost more than 30 per cent of its value during the last year against the Japanese yen, 33 per cent against the Swiss franc and 15 pet cent against the German mark.The basic problem with the dollar is there are too many in the hands of foreigners.…US Revamps Gold Selling MethodsUs Revamps Gold Selling MethodsU.S. Revamps Gold Selling Methods To Discourage World SpeculationSchenectady Gazette - Google News Archive - Oct 16, 1979Sy 1AMS HILDR!T11WASTITNOTON (UPI) In an effort to discourage sperulators and strengthen the dollar, the United States Tuesday revamped its methods for selling gold from the huge U.S. stockpile.Future sales of gold held by the Treasury “will be subject to variations in amounts and dates of offering.” an announcement said.Under the new procedures. “auctions can be held within a few days of an announcement and the amounts to be auctioned can be varied as may be appropriate at the tlme,” the Treasury said.…“Basically, what we are trying to do is to provide a little more flexibility and, hopefully, to deter speculation,” said a Treasury official.…The Treasury move drew Immediate praise from one of Congress’ leading economic experts, Chairman Henry Reuss. DWis., of the House Banking Committee. who called It “a good move.”The old policy of selling preannounced amounts on a certain day each month “plays into the hands of the gold speculators by showing all the cards once a month.” Reuss said.Now, he said. “We’ll keep the speculators guessing and thus benefit both the dollar and world economic stability.”…Gold has soared to levels that many experts believed were unthinkable just a few weeks ago because of lack of confidence in the U S. dollar and American economic policy.…Plan Told For Dealing With Gold SpeculatorsPlan Told For Dealing With Gold SpeculatorsTimes Daily - Google News Archive - Oct 15, 1979By TAKES BILDRETHWASHiNGTON (UPI) — The administration, seeking to supplement the Federal Resere Board’s tight credit policy, has unveiled a new strategy for dealing with gold speculators — keep ‘em guessing.From now on, the Treasury Department will not tell anyone until the last minute when they will hold a gold sale and how much may be bought from the U.S. stockpile of 265 million ounces.…The Treasury has held regularly scheduled monthly gold sales since May 1978.Originally, the monthly sales were limited to 300,000 ounces. That went to 750,000 ounces last November and to 1.5 mIllion ounces in December as part of the government’s dollar-rescue package.…Surprise Gold Auctions Coming‘Surprise’ gold auctions comingMiami News - Google News Archive - Oct 17, 1979The Treasury Department, in another move to support the dollar, says it will keep gold buyers guessing on future sales by no longer giving advance notice of the amounts or dates of its gold auctions. The average price of gold yesterday at the Treasury auction was a record high $391.98 per ounce. The decision to drop the regular monthly auctions was made to “deter speculation” in gold buying which has undermined confidence in the dollar and the ability of the United States to control inflation, a Treasury official said.Gold Continues Record RiseGold continues record riseStar-News - Google News Archive - Jan 17, 1980LONDON — Gold prices soared as high as $770 an ounce in major bullion markets Wednesday as worries about international events were compounded by concerns about shrinking supplies.…The greatest danger to Americans would occur if the rising price of gold pushed down the value of the dollar, which could worsen inflation. Although this happened in 1978 and part of 1979, the dollar hasn’t budged at all in recent months.…One said that whereas the rising price of gold in earlier months reflected in part a lack of confidence in the U.S. dollar, the recent price surge, coming agaInst the background of widespread turmoil in the world, reflects a loss of confidence in all currencies.The U.S. government has retreated to the sidelines during the current wild upward price spiral that took gold to $765 per ounce on Wednesday, an increase of $50 in a single day.The price of gold has more than doubled since the last Treasury Department gold auction on Nov. I. when gold sold for $372 an ounce.…Price Of Falls RapidlyPrice of Gold Falls RapidlyReading Eagle - Google News Archive - Jan 23, 1980LONDON (UPI) — The price of gold tumbled on world markets today in falls every bit as spectacular as the recent massive gains.Gold plummeted by an “unheard of” $132 overnight in Zurich, from $732 an ounce to open at $600 an ounce. In London, the price fell by $65, from $690 to $625 an ounce.The price of gold has fallen $225 in London since Monday afternoon when it peaked at a record $850 an ounce.The collapse of the gold spiral followed further rapid price drops overnight in New York and Hong Kong.…The opening Hong Kong price was $670 an ounce, a decline of $166.50 from Tuesday’s closing price en the exchange. By the close it was down to $645 an ounce.Hong Kong dealers said the plunge from Tuesday’s close of $836.50 was in response to lower prices on the New York and London exchanges.…Gold and the Dollar in a Flip-FlopMonday, Feb. 16, 1981Gold and the Dollar in a Flip-FlopBy BRUCE VAN VOORST; Christopher Byron; Frederick Ungeheuer…During the past four years the American dollar has sagged deeper and deeper, while the price of gold tended to soar higher and higher. In the past two weeks it has been the other way round. Gold has lurched lower, as the dollar has risen.The effect of this role reversal has been to discombobulate money markets everywhere, and last week the turmoil intensified. In Frankfurt, the deutsche mark slumped to a three-year low of 2.16 to the dollar, forcing the West German Bundesbank and the U.S. Federal Reserve into an unusual rescue mission of the mark. The two central banks each sold $500 million in dollars at midweek to prop up the weakening West German currency. In Zurich, the Swiss franc dropped into a two-year trough of 1.95 to the dollar, and in Milan the Italian lira plunged to a record low of 1,019 against the dollar. At the same time, the declining value of gold pushed bullion to $500.50 an ounce at week's end, or a little more than half the all time peak of $850 an ounce reached one year ago.The renewed volatility in currency values was unsettling because such gyrations make it difficult for international businessmen to negotiate a loan or sales contract, or even to project the cost of a company payroll. The bulk of international transactions is made in dollars, and an unstable currency makes all planning difficult. Moreover, some experts wondered if the new situation of a strengthening dollar would quickly be followed by a weakening of the U.S. currency. But Italian Economist Luigi Spaventa challenges this view, arguing: "The underlying causes appear to be far stronger than in previous cycles of the dollar."At least some of the dollar's appeal and gold's weakness is coming from what European bankers are calling the "Reagan euphoria." Just as the value of the dollar fell because world moneymen did not believe that Jimmy Carter was serious about battling inflation, it is now rising because the new Administration looks more determined. Said Beryl Sprinkel, the Under Secretary of the Treasury-designate for Monetary Affairs: "We're getting on top of this inflation problem, and the markets are beginning to believe it."…Us Ponders Its Stockpiled GoldU.S. Gold Ponders its StockpiledPalm Beach Post - Google News Archive - Sep 27, 1981By Andrew Mollison…Why not sell off the gold today?“That’s policy, and I can’t comment on what the commission would recommend,” one Treasury official said.“My goodness,” said another Treasury official, “It would probably lower the price if you started selling it in large quantities. Imagine the psychological impact. It would have a negative impact on the dollar.”The last time the government sold large quantities of gold — raising $4.2 billion by selling 15.8 millIon ounces of gold in 1978 and 1979 — it did so for the opposite reason: to support the dollar.“You don’t really want to get into that, do you?” a treasury official asked.Did those sales help balance the budget?…“When we sold the gold we retired the gold certificates we had issued to federal reserve banks in order to purchase the gold, and the profit went into the general receipts of the government,” he said. “It’s a way of financing the deficit instead of issuing treasury certificates, we had the receipts from those gold sales.”Why did the United States stop selling gold?“We never said.” a Treasury official replied. “In October of 1979 we simply announced that future sales of gold would be subject to variations in amounts and dates of offerings, held one more sale after that and kept our mouth shut from then on.”…
- Finished Final Outline Of Paper Finished final outline of paper. There are twenty sections. It will be long, and there will be fair amount of new material. Would you believe it possible that I have discovered another fraud larger than anything else I have written about on this blog? (hint: look at the graphs I published yesterday and the graph below) Once this final fraud is understood, a lot of things make sense.
- Some pictures Not done…
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
- Bill Gross Ponders "Deep Demographic Doo-Doo" Bill Gross usually writes an interesting column provided you skip over the first few paragraphs of introduction. His August Investment Outlook regarding population demographics is no different. Please consider Private Eyes.Our modern era of capitalism over the past several centuries has never known a period of time in which population declined or grew less than 1% a year. Currently, the globe is adding over 77 million people a year at a pace of 1.15% annually, but slowing.Observers will point out, as shown in the following chart, that global population growth rates have been declining since 1970 with no apparent ill effects. True, until 2008, I suppose. The fact is that since the 1970s we have never really experienced a secular period during which the private market could effectively run on its own engine without artificial asset price stimulation. The lack of population growth was likely a significant factor in the leveraging of the developed world’s financial systems and the ballooning of total government and private debt as a percentage of GDP from 150% to over 300% in the United States, for example. Lacking an accelerating population base, all developed countries promoted the financing of more and more consumption per capita in order to maintain existing GDP growth rates. Finally, in the U.S., with consumption at 70% of GDP and a household sector deeply in debt, there was nowhere to go but down. Similar conditions exist in most developed economies.The danger today, as opposed to prior deleveraging cycles, is that the deleveraging is being attempted into the headwinds of a structural demographic downwave as opposed to a decade of substantial population growth. Japan is the modern-day example of what deleveraging in the face of a slowing and now negatively growing population can do.The preceding analysis does not even begin to discuss the aging of this slower-growing population base itself. Japan, Germany, Italy and of course the United States, with its boomers moving toward their 60s, are getting older year after year. Even China with their previous one baby policy faces a similar demographic. And while older people spend a larger percentage of their income – that is, they save less and eventually dissave – the fact is that they spend far fewer dollars per capita than their younger counterparts. No new homes, fewer vacations, less emphasis on conspicuous consumption and no new cars every few years. Healthcare is their primary concern. These aging trends present a one-two negative punch to our New Normal thesis over the next 5–10 years: fewer new consumers in terms of total population, and a growing number of older ones who don’t spend as much money. The combined effect will slow economic growth more than otherwise.PIMCO’s continuing New Normal thesis of deleveraging, reregulation and deglobalization produces structural headwinds that lead to lower economic growth as well as half-sized asset returns when compared to historical averages. The New Normal will not be aided nor abetted by a slower-growing population nor by cyclical policy errors that thrust Keynesian consumption remedies on a declining consumer base. Current deficit spending that seeks to maintain an artificially high percentage of consumer spending can be compared to flushing money down an economic toilet.Keynesian Stimulus is Money Flushed Down the ToiletPlease read that last paragraph closely. Here is the key sentence "The New Normal will not be aided nor abetted by a slower-growing population nor by cyclical policy errors that thrust Keynesian consumption remedies on a declining consumer base."If anyone needs to read that paragraph, it is none other than PIMCO's Paul McCulley.Flashback Sunday, January 10, 2010: Pimco's Paul McCulley Wants Japan To Go "All In"In spite of the complete failure of Keynesian and Monetarist policies of Japan over two decades, amazingly Paul McCulley wants Japan to go "All In".“Japan’s problem is deflation, not inflation as far as an eye can see,” wrote Paul McCulley, a member of the investment committee, and Tomoya Masanao, the head of portfolio management for Japan, in a report on the Web site of Newport Beach, California-based Pimco. “An ‘all-in’ reflationary policy is what is needed.”The BOJ may also consider promising to refrain from raising interest rates until inflation becomes “meaningfully positive,” McCulley and Masanao said. Definitions of InsanityIn One Sentence: Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and over and expecting different results each time.In Two Words: Paul McCulleyIn One Word: KeynesianismIn Another Word: MonetarismJapan has already gone "all in". It has tried everything under the sun for two decades including Keynesianism, Monetarism, and selling its own currency to sink it. All it has to show for its efforts is a massive pile of debt equaling 227% of GDP.Amazingly, some people have learned nothing from two decades of complete failure.Send a Message to McCulleyI am glad to see Bill Gross admit that McCully advocates "flushing money down an economic toilet" because that is exactly what McCully has proposed on numerous occasions. My question now is "How long it will take for Gross to relay the message to McCulley?"Now, if we can only get the message to Obama, Geithner, Krugman, Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, and all the other Keynesian clowns perhaps it would do some good.That said, I do have one point of contention with Gross: Demographics or not, Keynesian stimulus never works. The idea one can spend one's way to prosperity is preposterous. As Japan has proven, attempts to do so in tantamount to a can-kicking escapade at best, and an unsustainable Ponzi scheme at worst. I lean towards the latter.Not once do any of the Keynesian clowns ever address the question "What happens when the stimulus runs out?"Keynesian Definition of Temporary is ForeverTake note of the $8,000 housing tax credits. Demand picked up and then subsequently collapsed. What next? Do we buy everyone a house whether they need one or not?That is essentially what McCulley suggested when he asked for Japan to go "All In". That is what Krugman and others are suggesting still.Geithner portrays it as "temporary".The Keynesian definition of temporary is "until it works". In other words "forever" because lunacy cannot and will not work in a sustainable fashion. It only appears to work for short-term durations.The classic example is the Greenspan induced housing bubble. Unemployment dropped to record lows , GDP soared, but in the end the bubble collapsed.That is what "All In" does.Demographic AnalysisWhile I commend the viewpoint of Bill Gross, it is hardly revolutionary except perhaps of his implied criticism of McCulley.Thursday, May 01, 2008: Demographics Of Jobless ClaimsStructural Demographics PoorStructural demographic effects imply that prospects in the full-time labor market will be poor for those over age 50-55 and workers under age 30. Teen and college-age employment could suffer a great deal from (1) a dramatic slowdown in discretionary spending and (2) part-time Boomer reentrants into the low-paying service sector; workers who will be competing with younger workers.Ironically, older part-time workers remaining in or reentering the labor force will be cheaper to hire in many cases than younger workers. The reason is Boomers 65 and older will be covered by Medicare (as long as it lasts) and will not require as many benefits as will younger workers, especially those with families. In effect, Boomers will be competing with their children and grandchildren for jobs that in many cases do not pay living wages.Consider what such a decline in US GDP growth and its multiplier effect could mean for Asian growth, global trade, demand for commodities, and growth elsewhere in the world (BRIC).The world equities markets have barely begun to discount the increasingly likely severe deceleration in US and world GDP growth ahead, including the secular Boomer drawdown of accumulated wealth of the past 25 yrs.Monday, August 31, 2009: Spending Collapses In All Generation GroupsBoomer Statistics$400 Billion: Amount that will come out of annual U.S. consumption as thrifty boomers push savings rate from 1% to nearly 5%.47%: Boomers share of national disposable income in 2005 before the bubble burst. Boomers contributed only 7% to national savings.2.4%: Forecasted GDP growth over the next three decades as boomers ratchet back. GDP has grown 3.2% a year since 1965.69%: Portion of boomers aged 54 to 63 who are financially unprepared for retirement.78%: Boomers' share of GDP growth during the bubble years of 1995 to 2005Those stats are from a McKinsey study, and there is nothing remotely inflationary about boomer demographics.Nor is there anything inflationary about Generation X demographics. Generation X's have seen boomers blow it. By sharply curtailing spending, generation X at least has chance to right the ship before retirement. It's too late for most boomers. Time ran out.Now consider generation Y with 19% of the population. Think the income levels of generation Y are going to catch boomers or generation X?When?Finally, think about tightening lending standards and attitudes about debt in general. Because of lower incomes and tighter lending standards, it is unlikely that Generation Y will be either able or willing to carry debt burdens to sustain a strong recovery.Distortionary vs. Inflationary Bernanke can flood the world with "reserves" and indeed he has. However, he cannot force banks to lend or consumers to borrow.Here is a simple analogy that everyone should be able to understand: You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it drink. And if the horse does not want to drink, it was a waste of time and energy to lead the horse to the water.Yet every day someone comes up with another convoluted theory about how inflationary this all is. It is certainly "distortionary" in that it creates problems down the road and prolongs a real recovery by keeping zombie banks alive (as happened in Japan). However, it is not (in aggregate) going to cause massive inflation because it is not spurring the creation of new debt.Recognition PhaseI have been talking about these trends for quite some time. The fact that Bill Gross is discussing these trends now is part of the "Recognition Phase".Bear in mind that Robert Prechter figured this out decades ago, far before most anyone else, indeed far too soon to do him or anyone else any good. Consumers figured it out a year ago. Mainstream media of which Bill Gross is an early practitioner is just starting to catch on. Bill Gross is behind bloggers, but he is far ahead of most of his peers.By the time mainstream media fully embraces these trends we will be two thirds through it. Such is the nature of the game.Brutal CombinationPlease note that it is not demographics per se that is doing us in, but rather enormous amounts of consumer debt (as a result of decades of Keynesian and Monetarist stimulus) in conjunction with unfavorable demographics and global wage arbitrage that is doing us in. Bill Gross missed this essential point.Mike "Mish" Shedlockhttp://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.comClick Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post ListMike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.
- Durable Goods Orders "Unexpectedly" Sink; How did Economi... I cannot help but laugh at economists who refuse to see the economy is slowing dramatically, and somehow think manufacturing is going to lead the way to recovery.Check out this headline on Bloomberg prior to the durable goods report: Orders for Durable Goods in U.S. Probably Rebounded in June July 28 (Bloomberg) -- Orders for durable goods probably increased in June for the sixth time in the past seven months, showing business spending is supporting the U.S. recovery, economists said before a report today.Bookings for goods meant to last at least three years rose 1 percent after dropping 0.6 percent in May, according to the median of 76 projections in a Bloomberg News survey. Excluding transportation gear, orders may have grown 0.4 percent.“Business spending, particularly for capital equipment, is holding up,” said Ken Mayland, president of ClearView Economics LLC in Pepper Pike, Ohio. “Ordering is strong as companies ramp up and resupply.”Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia President Charles Plosser said July 26 that there is fundamental strength in the economy. “I think there is underlying strength there that is still there,” Plosser said in an interview with Bloomberg Television in Washington. In the Bloomberg survey, the median and average forecasts were for an increase of +1%. The high forecast was a preposterous 4%.Excluding transportation, the median forecast was +.4% and average +.2%.Individual Forecasts 1.5 Percent or GreaterBarclays Capital +1.5%BNP Paribas +4.0%Citi +1.6%Desjardins Group +2.0%High Frequency Economics +2.0%J.P. Morgan Chase +1.7%Janney Montgomery Scott +3.2%Landesbank Berlin +2.8%Nomura Securities Intl. +3.0%PineBridge Investments +2.5%Raymond James +2.0%RBC Capital Markets +2.3%Ried, Thunberg & Co. +1.5%Thomson Reuters/IFR +2.9%Wrightson Associates +1.5%Individual Forecasts Below Zero Percent4CAST Ltd. -.5%IHS Global Insight -0.8% MF Global -1.0% Morgan Keegan & Co. -0.5%The Actual ReportInquiring minds are reading the Advance Report on Durable Goods Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories and Orders June 2010New OrdersNew orders for manufactured durable goods in June decreased $2.0 billion or 1.0 percent to $190.5 billion, the U.S. Census Bureau announced today. This was the second consecutive monthly decrease and followed a 0.8 percent May decrease.Excluding transportation, new orders decreased 0.6 percent. Excluding defense, new orders decreased 0.7 percent.Transportation equipment, down four of the last five months, had the largest decrease, $1.1 billion or 2.4 percent to $45.9 billion. This was due to nondefense aircraft and parts, which decreased $1.8 billion.ShipmentsShipments of manufactured durable goods in June, down two consecutive months, decreased $0.7 billion or 0.3 percent to $195.0 billion. This followed a 0.7 percent May decrease.Computers and electronic products, down four of the last five months, had the largest decrease, $1.3 billion or 4.1 percent to $31.3 billion.Capital GoodsNondefense new orders for capital goods in June decreased $1.1 billion or 1.6 percent to $64.1 billion.Shipments increased $0.6 billion or 1.0 percent to $63.2 billion. Unfilled orders increased $0.9 billion or 0.2 percent to $486.6 billion. Inventories increased $1.3 billion or 1.0 percent to $128.1 billion.Defense new orders for capital goods in June decreased $0.7 billion or 6.8 percent to $9.6 billion. Shipments decreased $0.1 billion or 1.5 percent to $9.8 billion. Unfilled orders decreased $0.2 billion or 0.1 percent to $139.6 billion. Inventories increased slightly or 0.1 percent to $17.9 billion.Stunningly Bad ReportThat was an across the board stunningly bad report. Note that it is impossible to blame defense spending and transpiration spending for the miss. Those categories, especially defense can be extremely volatile.Check out computers: Computers and electronic products, down four of the last five months, had the largest decrease, $1.3 billion or 4.1 percent to $31.3 billion.Does that explain why Intel did not light up the tech sector? I think so.Look at the forecasts again. There are many names the average person has heard of in the list of those blowing the forecast. Most would not recognize the names of the the few who got it right.Flashback Wednesday, July 14, 2010: Expect Second-Half Housing and Durable Goods CrashThose who think manufacturing is going to lead the way to a sustainable recovery need to think again. Data suggest durable goods sales are about to collapse. ....Pundits everywhere seem to think Intel will jump-start a further stock market rally. Articles are everywhere you look. They said the same thing in April, and look what happened.In contrast, I see little fundamental reason for business spending to pickup from here, and no technical reason to think anything other than Intel's blowouts are more than priced in.So, if consumers are not going to be buying appliances (or cars according recent surveys), and if commercial real estate is going to remain in the dumps, technology spending is likely unsustainable, and states will be laying off workers to balance budgets, pray tell where is the second half growth or jobs coming from?Here's a hint: Don't expect miracles from further stimulus either.The current Congress is not much in the mood and the next Congress is likely to be downright hostile to significantly more deficit spending.All things considered, earnings estimates and the stock market are both priced well beyond perfection, as are forward GDP estimates.In light of Consumption Inflection Point - No One Wants Credit; Consumer Spending Plans Plunge I do not think the durable goods call was difficult. Apparently it was.Mike "Mish" Shedlockhttp://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.comClick Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post ListMike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.
- Billboard Battle in Michigan - Police Scare Tactics The police union in Bay Michigan has resorted to scare tactics threatening more violence and masked terrorists if the city suspends a handful of police officers.Please consider Billboard Protest of Police Layoffs in Michigan Fuels Public Safety DebatePolice officers in Bay City, Mich., are being called domestic terrorists after renting billboard space to trumpet that the layoffs of five police officers in the town could lead to more shootings, stabbings, robberies and beatings.The police say they paid for the two billboards that went up last week to bring attention to the impasse in negotiations between its union and city officials, who are seeking a 10.8 percent reduction in labor costs from eight unions to tackle a $1.66 million budget deficit for the fiscal year that began July 1. The billboards also spotlight the city's decision to replace the roof on city hall for $1.6 million."City Hall's Roof Will Not Stop You From Getting: Beaten, Shot, Stabbed, Robbed. 5 Laid Off Bay City Cops Could Have!" one billboard reads.The other one shows a masked gunman and reads, "POSSIBLE. The result of Bay City Commissioners laying off five police officers.""I think it's distasteful and harmful to the community," Commission President Christopher Shannon told FoxNews.com. "I don't know what they wish to gain as far as good faith negotiating. I think it really drives a wedge somewhat between those of us who are trying to come up with reasonable compromises and those that are on the other side of it."The city reached a deal with the firefighters' union before the deadline of June 30 and says it is on the verge of inking contracts with three other unions that would reduce labor costs. But the police asked for a raise during its round of negotiations, Shannon said."As it turned out, as deadlines approached no one had really made any meaningful progress so we had to issue layoffs," Shannon said, noting that the city is bound by state law to present a balanced budget by June 30. "It wasn't the best option, but the only option we had given the fiscal pressures we were facing."Shannon said if the billboards are to be taken seriously and the police force believes it has lost its ability to protect and service, "it really forces me as commission president in Bay City, Mich., to put together a committee to explore contracting services out to the sheriff's department" and other local law enforcement agencies."If they cannot do their job…we have to consider alternatives to provide public safety," he said.Police are upset that the city spent $1.6 million fixing the roof on city hall. That sounds like a hell of an expensive roof for a city of approximately 34,000.However, a roof is a onetime fix, and raises granted to unions last forever. Without being there it is difficult to accurately access the roof. However, it is easy to weigh in on police scare tactics and absurd pension benefits.Once again, if the union had any concern for residents it was supposed to protect, it would not be running these ads and it would accept pay cuts to protect jobs.The action by Bay City police is very similar to the MTA union running ads showing Iranian Terrorists. If you missed it, please see Transit Union Plays Nuclear Terrorist Card.I commend the statement by commissioner Shannon threatening to outsource the police department to the local sheriff's association.Indeed, government should opt to provide the most services at the least cost, not the fewest benefits at the most cost. Public unions invariably do the latter. Outsourcing to the sheriff's association would save a huge amount of money, enough to allow Bay City to have more officers for less money, so that is exactly what it should do.If you live in Bay City, it is important to stand up to the police thugs attempting to extort more of your dollars via tax increases. Please call the mayor and the city council and ask them to outsource the police department.Mike "Mish" Shedlockhttp://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.comClick Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post ListMike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.
- New Home Sales and Bear Market Math One can't help but laugh at headlines touting a huge 23.% jump in new home sales given that the "jump" was to the second worst month in history, dating back to 1963.Dave Rosenberg puts the headline jump into perspective in Housing Data Are Not Supportive.Market sentiment is positive and as a result of the market going straight up, people believe that the economic data are somehow getting better. Not the case at all.April new home sales were revised DOWN to a 422k annual rate from 504k when the data for the month were first released. You know what that means? It means that the homebuyer tax credit was even a bigger dud than we thought it was previously. No bang for the buck from these spending gimmicks.May new home sales were revised DOWN to 267k units from 300k. That sure puts a 23.6% "jump" to 330k into perspective, doesn't it? It's called bear market math.At 330k in June, this goes down as the second worst month on record (data back to January 1963). And in per capita terms it is far worse than that considering the population has expanded 63% since then.Now, if we take the original unrevised number for April, the unrevised May data-point, and the June consensus estimate of 310k, then the average of the past three months would have been 371k. But post-revisions and with the actual June print, sales have averaged 340k at an annual rate.That puts the data into proper context. We are actually left with a weaker three-month profile of home sales after the release of the data yesterday, not the opposite. Also, it took a median of 12.4 months for the builders to locate a buyer upon completion – a record for June.The unsold inventory number was also revised sharply higher in May and because of that, the backlog looks so much better now – from 9.6 months' supply to 7.6 months'. Even so, a well-balanced market, as any real estate agent will tell you, is 5-6 months' supply.Maybe this is why the average sales price was cut 9.8% MoM in the third steepest month ever in terms of discounting. At $242,900 for an average price of a new home sold, this represented the lowest number since October 2003 and off 26% from the 2007 peak.But just think about that for a second. The third largest price cut in history managed to generate the second worst new home sales tally on record. This is something to get excited about?Given that housing leads recoveries (more specifically housing starts followed by new home sales), this is another nail in the coffin that suggests there has been no recovery except in financial assets. Moreover, that financial recovery is only a result of unsustainable stimulus that is now quickly fading into the sunset.Mike "Mish" Shedlockhttp://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.comClick Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post ListMike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.
- Consumer Confidence Sinks to 50.4, a 5-Month Low; Home Pr... Consumer confidence has plunged to 50.4. To put the number in perspective, it was averaging 98 in the last expansion.Bloomberg reports U.S. Economy: Consumer Confidence Slips to Five-Month LowThe Conference Board’s sentiment index fell to 50.4, below the median forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg News and the lowest level in five months, figures from the New York-based private research group showed today. Another report showed home prices rose more than forecast in May as a government tax credit temporarily underpinned sales.“Faith in the economic recovery is failing,” said Guy LeBas, chief fixed-income strategist at Janney Montgomery Scott LLC in Philadelphia, who had forecast the confidence index would drop to 50.3. “It’ll be 2013 before we see any semblance of normality in the labor market. It means weaker purchases.”Home prices in 20 cities climbed 4.6 percent in May from the same month last year, exceeding the median forecast of economists surveyed and the biggest 12-month gain since August 2006, a report from S&P/Case-Shiller also showed. Home sales plunged following the April 30 contract-signing expiration of a government incentive worth up to $8,000, raising the risk that property values will slacken in coming months.“There may still be some residual impact from the homebuyers’ tax credit,” David Blitzer, chairman of the index committee at S&P, said in a statement. “It still looks possible that the housing market might bounce along the bottom for the foreseeable future, before showing any real improvement that will filter through to the rest of the economy.” Case-Shiller a Very Lagging Price IndicatorIt would help if analysts understood (and properly explained) what is happening and how Case-Shiller works.Calculated Risk explains in Survey shows house prices falling in June, but long wait for house price indexesCampbell Surveys put out a press release this morning: Home Prices Tumble in Most Categories During June (no link).The Case-Shiller index is a three month average and is released with a two month lag. The Case-Shiller house price index to be released tomorrow will be for a three month average ending in May.The first Case-Shiller release with July prices will be released at the end of September - and that will include the months of May, June and July! And prices were probably up in May and June.And prices don't fall overnight. Based on the timing of the above survey, prices fell from May to June - and those transactions will probably mostly closed in August. That is why Popik is saying the price declines will not show up in house price indexes until October of November.With that in mind, let's revise David Blitzer's statement so that it actually makes sense.“It still looks possible that the housing market might bounce along the bottom for the foreseeable future, Case-Shiller reported prices will rise for a few more months before showing any real improvement that will filter through to the rest of the economy. sinking again this Autumn. Anyone expecting home price improvements to filter through to the rest of the economy simply does not understand how lagging the Case-Shiller index is, the change in consumer sentiment, or how rapidly the real economy is deteriorating.”Indeed, I expect a Expect Second-Half Housing and Durable Goods Crash.The key reason is consumer spending plans have crashed as noted in Consumption Inflection Point - No One Wants Credit; Consumer Spending Plans Plunge.Mike "Mish" Shedlockhttp://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.comClick Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post ListMike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.
- Afghanistan is a "Lost Cause"; Leaked Documents Show Fut... The questions on my mind are: How many trillions of dollars do we have to spend, how many lives need to be wasted, and how much longer are we going to be involved in the boondoggle known as Afghanistan?Such questions were on my mind even before Leaked Documents Underscore Lawmakers’ Concerns on Afghan WarPresident Barack Obama faces renewed concern about his Afghanistan war strategy after leaked military documents suggested Pakistan’s main intelligence agency secretly aided the Taliban and others the U.S is trying to defeat.Disclosure of the documents, as Congress this week considers funding for the U.S. troop buildup in Afghanistan, underscored questions about the war while many lawmakers prepare to go home to campaign in August.Some of the 92,000 classified reports, disclosed July 25 by the website Wikileaks, say that members of Pakistan’s Inter- Services Intelligence Directorate helped the Taliban and other Islamic rebels. The documents, covering 2004 through 2009, were reported by the New York Times, the London-based Guardian and the German magazine Der Spiegel, which said Wikileaks provided them the reports three weeks ago.The leaked documents “raise serious questions about the reality of America’s policy toward Pakistan and Afghanistan,” said Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat. “Those policies are at a critical stage,” and the documents “make the calibrations needed to get the policy right more urgent.”‘Not Pretty’“I’ve been to a number of briefings and I’ve always been provided a more upbeat picture than the one” depicted by the documents, said Representative James McGovern, a Massachusetts Democrat who opposes Obama’s Afghan policy. “The picture that is painted here is not pretty.”Obama announced in December plans to send another 30,000 combat troops to Afghanistan, and Congress is under pressure to pass legislation paying for the buildup before taking its monthlong summer recess. Obama has said he will start to draw down U.S. forces in July 2011 and give more security responsibility to the Afghans, depending on conditions.Polls show support for the war waning. Almost 6 in 10 respondents in a Bloomberg National Poll conducted July 9-12 said Afghanistan is a lost cause.Also, 60 percent of Americans surveyed thought the withdrawal of forces should start in July 2011 even if the situation in Afghanistan remains unstable. The poll of 1,004 adults had a margin of error of 3.1 percentage points.The document leak constitutes the “the largest single unauthorized release of currently classified records -- multiple times the volume of the Pentagon Papers” about the Vietnam war leaked to newspapers in 1971, said Steve Aftergood, director for the Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy.Arizona Senator John McCain, ranking Republican on the Armed Services Committee, said, “We are finally beginning to address many of the problems highlighted within these leaked documents.” McCain generally supports the war effort, though he opposes setting a date to begin a withdrawal.House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, said she doesn’t believe the leak will affect support for the war-funding legislation because the group of reports “predates the president’s new policy.”The Senate last week approved $60 billion to fund the troop buildup in Afghanistan and other needs. The House version, passed earlier this month after Democratic leaders used parliamentary tactics to push it through, included funds to help states avoid having to fire teachers.The House plans to debate a nonbinding resolution by Representative Dennis Kucinich, an Ohio Democrat, seeking removal of U.S. troops from Pakistan.The documents show it is “indisputable” that “our nation has fallen into a trap of continued occupation and escalation that can only lead to more tragedy,” Kucinich said. Motivation for the Leak in QuestionWhoever leaked those documents is a national hero if it was done for the sake of disclosing the truth as opposed to creating a political firestorm. I suspect the latter. However, I am still glad the truth is out.Parrots and Warmongers SpeakMcCain and Obama are both warmongers. Neither is fit for office. In contrast, Nancy Pelosi is a parrot willing to say whatever Obama tells her to say. Parrots are unfit for office as well.I think there is a good Saturday Night Live skit here, with Obama talking and Pelosi in a parrot suit repeating verbatim what Obama says.Anyway, Afghanistan is a "Lost Cause" no matter how much more we spend or how long we stay. Does anyone remember the original mission? Here it is: To catch Bin Laden.Instead of pursuing Bin Laden, we got sidetracked in an insane war in Iraq that did not need to be fought. So here were are, having wasted trillions of dollars, and all we have accomplished in 10 years is to make more enemies and wreck the economy.Amazingly, we have a deadline of July 2011 to start pulling out troops, even though there is no clear mission as to what we expect to accomplish between now and then.Mission DefinedA best as I can tell, the mission is to start withdrawing troops in summer of 2011 (come hell of high water), nicely timed for Obama's reelection ramp.I have a better idea: I propose Congress pass a binding resolution this is 2011 and the war has been won. That way, we can start pulling out troops now and find better uses for another $60 billion dollars Obama wants to waste in Afghanistan.Mike "Mish" Shedlockhttp://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.comClick Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post ListMike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.
- Bears Go Into Hibernation - Stock Short Sales at 2-Year Low The summer stock market blast higher has wiped out the conviction of short sellers. Bears are back in hibernation and Stock Short Sales at 2-Year Low, Data Explorers Says.Investors are exiting bearish bets on global equities, pushing bullish wagers on stocks to a two- year high versus short sales, according to Data Explorers.The firm’s long-short ratio has risen to 9.5, having surged from 5.75 in September 2008 when Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.’s collapse intensified the financial crisis, the London- and New York-based securities-research company said. The reading is the highest of the data that goes as far back as July 2008.“Short sellers are now taking money off the table,” said Will Duff Gordon, a senior researcher at Data Explorers in London. “Perhaps the bears are going back into hibernation?”Barton Biggs, the hedge fund manager who sold half his equity holdings at the start of July, said today that signs the U.S. economy will avoid a recession spurred him to build the stakes back up. Whipsaw CityMany traders are getting whipsawed here. Chasing shorts lower and longs higher has certainly been the wrong approach most of this year.Mike "Mish" Shedlockhttp://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.comClick Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post ListMike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.
- Implosion of the China "Fabric City" Frenzy Here is an interesting translation of a Chinese article regarding textile work and vacant cities in China. My "China Friend" who wants to remain anonymous writes ...Hello MishIn Yangzi Delta Region alone, there are dozens of so called “International Garment Cities”. These cities are built under the direction of a local government investment plan. In many cases, huge parcels of land are sold to real estate developers, who promote the sale of individual shops which are to be built inside the garment city. The marketing material often carries the promise of “ high investment return” and “developer will rent” to lure the retail investor from all over China.However, many so called "garment cities" are very poorly positioned. Moreover, they are a hybrid of department store, factory outlet, distribution center, and many of them have a 50% vacancy rate or higher due to the over expansion in this sector.The Hua Xia Times, published an article on the World's No1 Fabric City and the financial problems of Wuxi New World Department Stores under tremendous stress with investors calling for cancellation of contracts.There are total 6000 shops in New World, but more than 3 quarters are vacant. Thousand of retail investors now are demanding the return of the investment from local government and developer.The 4 billion RMB New World Investment Project began construction in 2004. Now it is a total disaster with very thin customer traffic to generate enough cash flow to pay the shop rent alone.In Shanghai, Wuxi, Suzhou Area alone, there are dozens of similar so called “ Fabric Cities”, such as Wuxi Orient International Fabric City, Shanghai Sutong International Fabric City, Shanghai Yangpu International Fabric City, Shanghai Fengjing Fabric City, Wujiang International Fabric city, Changshu International Fabric City, Shuzhou Xiangchen International Fabric City, Gaoyou Huang International Garment Trade City, total investment exceed 30 billion.Besides “Fabric City”, you can find “Electronic City”, ‘High Technology City”, “Tourist City”, so on and so forth, all are investment frenzy built to drive local GDP growth , but in reality, GDP is construction GDP only.Once again, US perception of China vs. what is really happening in China is far off the mark.Mike "Mish" Shedlockhttp://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.comClick Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post ListMike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.
- Money Supply Divergence - TMS1 vs. TMS2 vs. M2 - What doe... Inquiring minds are once again digging deep into money supply questions. They are intrigued by the fact that money supply measures M2 and TMS1 are plunging towards zero, while TMS2 is still sporting a hefty 10+% year-over-year growth.TMS stands for "True Money Supply". The suffix (1 or 2) stands for alternate measures, one including savings accounts and the other not. M2 is a widely used Fed aggregate for money.This looks technical (and it is), but please bear with me. I can and will explain in easy to understand terms exactly what is happening and why, along with what it all means.TMS1 vs. TMS2 vs. M2 GrowthThe above chart courtesy of Michael Pollaro - Austrian Money Supply. Annotations and arrows on chart by me.The idea behind TMS1 and TMS2 is to sort credit transactions from actual money available on demand.For all practical purposes, TMS1 consists of currency in circulation + checking accounts, + sweeps of checking accounts. There is no dispute by anyone that the components of TMS1 represent money on demand.Think of it this way: Cash in your pocket and cash in your checking account are there whenever you want, on demand. Indeed, the banking industry refers to checking accounts as "DDA" accounts, Demand Deposit Accounts.Others want to include savings accounts, time deposits (CDs), and money market accounts in money supply measures.TMS1 vs. TMS2. vs M2 AggregatesNotes 1-3 from Pollaro(1) To clarify any confusion for those readers familiar with Frank Shostak’s AMS metric, note that (a) as is the case with AMS, TMS1 excludes savings deposits but adds back bank deposit sweep programs, and (b) in contrast to AMS, TMS1 does not include the SFP account.(2) Time and Savings Deposits due Foreign Accounts and US Government Time and Savings Deposits at Banks have been excluded from TMS2 owing to fact that SavingsDeposits are not separately reported by the Federal Reserve Board and, given the fact that Time Deposits are not money, it was deemed the more conservative formulation(3) Sweeps of Transaction Deposits into MMDAs are included in TMS2 by virtue of fact that those deposits are included; i.e., a component part of the Savings Deposits, including MMDAs FRB aggregateComparison AnalysisM2 includes savings accounts + small time deposits (CDs) + money market accounts.TMS2 includes TMS1 + savings accounts but not money market accounts or small time deposits.With the exception of sweeps, the rest of the components have little effect.The main dispute between the TMS1 and TMS2 camps is in regards to what to do with savings accounts. Proponents of TMS2 claim savings accounts represent money available on demand, while proponents of TMS1 take the tact that savings accounts are "credit transactions" and should not be included in strict monetary aggregates.I have sided with TMS1 along with Austrian economist Frank Shostak on this point.We will return to the debate later but first let's first explore why M2 and TMS1 are dropping rapidly while TMS2 is not.Part of the discrepancy can be explained by close analysis of Small Time Deposits and Savings Deposits.Small time deposits are Certificates of Deposit - CDs under $100,000. For comparison purposes, "Large Time Deposits" include "Jumbo CDs", amounts above $100,000.Total Savings Deposits at all Depository InstitutionsThe chart shows Savings Deposits have been rising rapidly since the mid-1990's.One reason is Sweep Account Programs.Since January 1994, hundreds of banks and other depository financial institutions have implemented automated computer programs that reduce their required reserves by analyzing customers' use of checkable deposits (demand deposits, ATS, NOW, and other checkable deposits) and "sweeping" such deposits into savings deposits (specifically, MMDA, or money market deposit accounts). Under the Federal Reserve's Regulation D, MMDA accounts are personal saving deposits and, hence, have a zero statutory reserve requirement.Retail sweep programs have substantially distorted the growth of M1, total reserves and the monetary base, as Chairman Greenspan noted in his July 1995 Humphrey-Hawkins Act testimony to the Congress. ..... The initiation of a sweep program of any importance sharply decreases a depository's reported checkable deposits and increases its reported savings deposits.In simple English: Savings accounts have no reserves while checking accounts do. Greenspan allowed banks to sweep money from checking accounts into savings accounts (unbeknown to customers) so that banks could lend out more of those deposits.Because of sweeps, reported M1 figures have been grossly distorted since 1995. Since M2 and TMS2 include savings accounts, neither has been affected by sweeps.TMS1 corrects the M1 problem by adding back in sweeps.In addition to sweeps, there has been a pronounced shift in the attitudes of retail consumers saving money in Small Time Deposits (CDs). Let's take a look.Small Time Deposits at ThriftsSmall Time Deposits at Commercial BanksPeriod 1 AnalysisPeriod 1 represents two different factors:1. Massive consolidation in thrifts2. Decreased time preference for money in light of the stock market boom and productivity increases associated with the internet revolution.To understand period 1, one needs to add both charts for a composite. Taking the 1991 recession as the starting point and the 2001 recession as the ending point, and adding both charts together, the net result was huge decrease in demand for money (a decrease in the savings rate).People felt no need to save money in banks and regarded CDs as fodder for fools. Stock market speculation was the preferred method of saving.This period is part of what Ben Bernanke calls the "Great Moderation".What actually happened is increased productivity (primarily via the internet revolution) masked huge monetary inflation. As a result, corporate profits soared as did demand for equities, especially internet stocks.This culminated in the "dotcom" internet bubble and subsequent crash.Period 2 AnalysisPeriod 2 represents the aftermath of the internet crash with a Fed hellbent on bailing out banks massively underwater on bad loans made to failed dotcom companies and hopeless loans to Latin American countries starting to default.To bail out the banks, Greenspan slashed interest rates, holding them too low, too long. The result was an enormous housing bubble, unprecedented in world history.In practical terms, the result was a further decrease in demand for money accompanied by the widespread belief "my house is my savings and retirement plan".The phrase "decrease in demand for money" means people did not want to hold cash. Instead they wanted to buy houses, cars, boats, and things for their houses. The savings rate went negative for the first time in history (recently revised to just above zero).Most thought home prices would rise forever and many took out loans against their homes to buy boats and cars or to take vacations. Others added rooms or remodeled comfortable they would get the money back and then some. People did not realize it, but they were playing the "greater fool" game never bothering to do the math or ask "who would be able to buy?"Inflation in period 2 was masked because the Fed and the CPI ignore housing prices in their analysis. Ironically, popular hyperinflationist sites such as Shadowstats probably underestimated price inflation in this period as well.Period 3 AnalysisPeriod 3 is quite interesting. Notice how a sharp upturn in demand for CDs preceded the popping of the housing bubble.Period 3 culminated with the Fed slashing short-term rates to near-zero percent. As a result CD rates plunged.Price inflation in this period was hugely overstated because crashing home prices were not properly factored in.Period 4 AnalysisLet's kick off the discussion with a question: Is this period like the "internet bubble" or the "Housing Bubble" where there was a decreased desire for saving and the economy (and inflation) is off to the races?In one word "No!"Consumers have no demand for equities having been burnt twice badly already, first in the internet crash, then in the housing (financial), crash. Moreover, there have been recent and massive equity fund withdrawals.Moreover, massive numbers of boomers now in retirement or soon heading that way need (or will soon need) to drawn down those savings to live on. Boomers are now scared to death of further drawdowns, and in my estimation rightfully so.With plans to buy houses at all time lows, this is certainly not reflective of another housing boom.Why The Decline In CDs?For the answer, let's Compare CD Rates with Savings Deposit Rates.1-Year CD Rates5-Year CD RatesSavings Deposit RatesThe above tables all courtesy of Bankrate.Com, a good place to visit for such comparisons.Consumer Saving QuestionThe question consumers face is whether to lock up deposits for a year at 1.5% or shift money to savings accounts at 1.3% as CDs expire. Is the .2% difference commensurate with the risk?I do not think so even though I sit squarely on the deflation side. So, what's the average person to think?Moreover, the same analysis holds true for 5 year CDs. Does anyone want to tie up money for 5 years at 3%?Most don't. So instead of rolling over CDs the money goes into savings accounts hoping for better rates down the road.Bernanke, like Greenspan before him, is crucifying savers in an attempt to bail out banks via a steep yield curve. Unfortunately, for those getting screwed by Bernanke's scheme, better rates are likely not coming. There is no housing or internet bubble to blow this go around.TMS1 vs. TMS2 TheoryReturning to the money supply debate, the difference between TMS1, TMS2, and M2 comes down to a question as to what constitutes money on demand vs. what is a credit transactions.Savings accounts are without a doubt credit transactions. People deposit money in savings accounts in return for interest. Banks lend that money out. People know that banks lend the money out. That is why they receive interest. There are no reserves on savings accounts.I worked in the industry for years. Savings accounts are TDA accounts - Time Deposit Accounts. The difference between savings accounts and CDs is CDs are type of time deposit with a fixed term and a guaranteed rate, while savings accounts are time deposits with a flexible term and in general no guaranteed rate.In contrast, checking accounts are demand deposit accounts (DDA accounts) where money is available on demand.Proponents of TMS2 maintain that savings accounts are flexible and can be withdrawn without notice and thus reflect money on demand. The debate even gets down to esoteric discussions as to whether or not savings account terms that commonly stipulate 30 days notice before withdrawal will ever be enforced.The latter point is essentially a sideshow because the real issue is not how quickly something can be converted to cash but whether or not the transaction is a credit transaction.One can pay a penalty and cash in a CD equally as well. One can write a limited number of checks on some kinds of money market accounts as well. On that basis, if one is going to include credit transactions in the aggregates, one may as well include other types of credit transactions as well. Indeed that is exactly what the flawed measure MZM (money at zero maturity does).Walking too Fine a LineTMS2 attempts to draw a fine line differentiating between types of credit transactions. It fails by rigorous definition (ignoring the fact that savings accounts are credit transactions) while instead focusing on the issue of presumed immediate availability, even though one has to transfer money from savings to checking or withdraw it to make it truly available.TMS2 also fails by practical application. From a practical standpoint, there is essentially no difference between money sitting in savings accounts vs. CDs if the intent in either case is to save and not to spend.From that standpoint, please consider Consumption Inflection Point - No One Wants Credit; Consumer Spending Plans PlungeMaybe putting a bit of a tiny exclamation point behind the need of business spending to indeed pick up is data we saw in the consumer confidence report concerning consumer spending plans. We have not updated the following chart in some time, so here it is in all its glory.As per the report last Tuesday, consumer plans to buy major appliances and autos hit new lows. And yes, as you'd expect post the expiration of the tax credits for home buying, plans to buy homes has retreated. Wildly surprising? Not really. But it does reinforce the message of business spending importance both in 2H 2010 and into 2011.A tip of the hat to the Contrary Investor for explicit permission for the above snip.Consumers have no intention of spending. Instead, people are letting CDs expire with the money likely headed for savings accounts. It is silly to propose this is meaningful.An increase in the personal saving rate is another reason for the recent increase in savings accounts.Rising Savings RateHaving reached a secular low, the savings rate now appears headed up.Indeed, the internet bubble and the housing bubble were associated with periods when the savings rate crashed!The rising savings rate, some of which is making its way into savings accounts, is a deflationary phenomenon. This is in contrast to other periods where M2, TMS2, or savings accounts rose in conjunction with a rapidly expanding economy.Thus, one must not only look at what is happening but why it something is happening to draw proper conclusions.TMS2 Fatally FlawedSavings accounts rose by over $1 trillion in period 4 on the above charts, while CDs shrunk by about $460 billion. The rest of the difference is easily accounted for by sweeps, increased liquidity preferences, and a rise in the savings rate.By attempting to split hairs with what does or does not constitute "money available on demand" while ignoring the more important issue that savings accounts are credit transactions, TMS2 creates a misleading distortion out of thin air.Moreover, please remember that savings accounts do not represent money about to be lent out. Given there are no reserves on savings accounts, banks have already lent the money out (or it sits as excess reserves on deposit with the Fed).The topic of "excess reserves" inevitably brings up a discussion of Money Multiplier Theory.Money Multiplier Theory Is WrongMost proponents of TMS2 (and in fact most people in general) adhere to a falsehood that sideline cash and excess reserves are ready to come flooding into the market at any time causing prices to rise.In regards to excess reserves, the reality as Steve Keen and I have pointed out is "lending comes first and bank reserves come second". Please see Fictional Reserve Lending And The Myth Of Excess Reserves and also Fiat World Mathematical Model for a complete discussion.Putting it All TogetherThe widely touted discrepancy between TMS1 and TMS2 consists of three things:1. A meaningless shift from one credit transaction bucket to another (from CDs to Savings Accounts)2. An increase in liquidity preference3. An increase in the savings rate that has turned up in savings accounts as opposed to checking accounts.Those are deflationary, not inflationary phenomena.By attempting to split hairs as to what is considered a credit transaction, TMS2 introduces a huge distortion that takes a great deal of analysis to properly sort out.Unsurprisingly, most TMS2 proponents have drawn invalid conclusions as to what the discrepancy between TMS1 and TMS2 actually means. Careful analysis shows the spread between TMS1 and TMS2 represents deflationary phenomena, the very opposite of what most TMS2 proponents suggest!By the way, things are so distorted by the Fed because of sweeps and because of fractional reserve lending that checking account deposits that are supposed to be available on demand really aren't. For proof, think of what would happen if everyone were to attempt to pull all their checking account deposits at once.Indeed, things are so screwed up that it is easy to make a case that percentagewise, very little is truly available on demand. Nonetheless, all we can do is pick the best measure of money available. From a theoretical and practical standpoint, that measure is TMS1.Addendum:I received several questions as to why savings accounts and CDs are "credit transactions". Here is a simple explanation.CDs and Savings Accounts are credit transactions because you voluntarily relinquish control of money to banks. You lend it to them.You do not lend checking accounts to banks. Instead, you deposit money with the idea that it is yours, available immediately on demand by writing checks.Some get hung up on the notion that savings accounts are immediately available. That is not technically true, as there is typically a 30 day waiting period specified in the deposit.More importantly, whether or not that waiting period is enforced or even if it exists at all (and this is where TMS2 proponents split hairs), does not alter the simple fact that savings accounts are credit transactions where control of the deposit is voluntarily handed over to the bank in return for interest, so banks in turn can lend the money out at an even higher interest rate.It is the relinquishment of ownership of the funds (however temporary - even for so long as to have to transfer money from savings accounts to checking accounts to make use of it) that makes CDs and Savings Accounts credit transactions. By splitting hairs between various types of credit transactions, primarily based on how fast control of money can be regained by the depositor, TMS2 distorts the picture of what is really happening and what it all means.Bear in mind, the Fed has so distorted the system that "It's all credit". There is nothing backing any of this, including checking accounts. The fact that "It's all credit" should not stop us from making the best theoretical case we can for what should be considered credit transactions vs. non-credit transactions.Mike "Mish" Shedlockhttp://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.comClick Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post ListMike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.
- Edge of Financial Chasm Here is an interesting story with an Oregon slant that reflects problems all states now face. Please consider Oregon budget stands at precarious crossroad.Oregon government stands at the edge of a financial chasm as precarious as any in its 151-year history, hemmed in by the global recession, questionable spending decisions and a budget-draining combo of skyrocketing expenses and sluggish growth.Consider this sobering fact: State expenses, including payroll, health and retirement benefits, and debt payments, are slated to rise by nearly $4 billion over the next two years -- a 26 percent jump. During the same period, however, revenues to pay those expenses are expected to increase by a little less than $2 billion, or about 14 percent -- and that assumes a return to a robust economy.Oregon simply can't keep up.Lacking a substantial tax increase, which appears unlikely, the state won't have the money to offer the same level of services, pay and benefits to the same number of people.The state has faced tough times before, but this crisis is a game changer, economists and political leaders agree. Past budgetary tricks, such as borrowing or sweeping money from other state funds, won't cut it.The only way out, they say, is to make dramatic, permanent changes. The choices that lie ahead affect not only the state budget, but the kind of place Oregon will become: What kind of schools will we have? Which criminals will go to prison? Who gets help when they need it? What kind of business climate do we want? And how much do we all pay in taxes?"The public is going to have to understand that we will have a very different Oregon in 2020 than we did in 2010," says John Tapogna, president of ECONorthwest, one of the state's top economic consulting firms.There is much more in the article including a lengthy discussion of four problems Oregon faces.Problem 1: Our income is shrinkingProblem 2: We have more people in needProblem 3: We've locked up a lot of moneyProblem 4: We can't grow our way outEmail AnecdotesHere are some anecdotes from reader Denise in response to Oregon's Public Employee Retirement System (PERS) in Deep Trouble, Taxpayers on the HookHello MishI Read your post on Oregon's Public Employee Retirement System's troubles with interest. We just returned from visiting a friend on the Oregon coast - and have spent many vacations in the state over the years.The coast is struggling badly. There are homes for sale everywhere. Available commercial properties abound.We saw housing developments with only a few completed homes, most empty, and often surrounded by empty lots with weeds many feet high. One condo complex located in the Florence marina has 30+ units available. Only two have sold despite a list of enticements. I wouldn't want to be one of the two owners - it was practically screaming bank foreclosure coming.And despite that this is their high season - do or die for many coastal businesses - the roads were practically deserted, hotels available everywhere - and miles of empty beaches. We spoke with many restaurant and lodging owners and they all agreed that it's never been worse.Hard to be optimistic for the economy of the beautiful Oregon Coast.DeniseUniversal ProblemsThose are problems all states face, not just Oregon.It is one hell of a list of problems and states will face those even if the economy starts to grow at a fair pace.Problem 3 is the crucial one. The "locked up" category includes pension promises that cannot be met and public union salaries way out of line with private sector salaries.End of the Line for Meaningful Can-Kicking DelaysWhen it comes to state budgets, the low lying fruit has been picked. Indeed all the fruit has been picked and next year's harvest has been spoken for as well. Thus it's the end of the line for state's ability to kick the can down the road in a meaningful way, if employment does not dramatically pick up soon.Here's a hint: it won't.The only question is how long the administration and the Fed can keep this mess from flying apart like a pile of straw in a tornado. Obama's goal of course, is to delay that tornado until after the election. However, people are so fed up with Obama now, that election-wise it probably does not matter.Obama is likely to lose the House in the upcoming election and enough seats in the Senate that he will not be able to pass his agenda. Hopefully, republicans will start doing a better job than they did under president Bush. Arguably that is a long shot. However, people have had enough of Obama's offering the worst possible combination of corporatism, socialism, and war-mongering that either side has to offer.Mike "Mish" Shedlockhttp://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.comClick Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post ListMike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.
Cara Community
- Bill Cara’s Blog for July 29, 2010 Morning Call [8:01am ET] Because there are so many who fail to meet the challenges involved, being established as a pro trader is a symbol of success. There are many paths to take –income, safety, growth, currencies (including gold), emerging markets and speculation – but at the end of the day every successful trader knows what works best for him or her and where to get reliable information and worthy opinions. read more
- Tables & Charts for Wednesday, Jul 28th, 2010
- Bill Cara’s Blog for July 28, 2010 [See post-close report] Morning Call [8:18am ET] This morning we get to look into the US durable goods report to see how bad off the consumer demand for discretionary goods has been. Yesterday, Rick Davis’ Consumer Metrics Institute reported the US economic data he sees has now dropped to the lowest level since late November 2008 and that the current contraction in consumer demand for discretionary durable goods has extended for more than 6 months. read more
- Tables & Charts for Tuesday, Jul 27th, 2010
- Bill Cara’s Blog for July 27, 2010 [See post-close report] Morning Call [6:56am ET] Despite over-bought indicators, yesterday’s close was a strong one, indicating that traders are willing to continue buying risk here. But the first target on the S&P 500 at 1115 was reached in a single day, and with the next one being 1130, there will likely be some bumps along the way. This morning it was clear that Asia-Pacific equity markets were somewhat more cautious; nothing much happened in mixed trading. read more
- Tables & Charts for Monday, Jul 26th, 2010
- Bill Cara’s Blog for July 26, 2010 [See post-close report] Morning Call [7:57am ET] Uncertainty by Mr Market. Choppy trading in commodities. Massive pressures building in forex markets. Bond traders holding substantial gains since April. Mixed signals in the equity markets with near-term strength and short- and (possibly) intermediate-term weakness anticipated for the S&P 500. This weekend, all of the cross-currents added up to a confused and probably confusing Week In Review. Sorry. But it is what it is. read more
- Week in Review #30, 2010 [7:12pm ET Sunday] Mixed signals. Traders are taking on more risk in the short term and yet they fear the distinct possibility of a massive shake-out to come this fall. A week ago we referred to the possibility of a wall of worry filled summer rally. This week we will be looking for clues from bonds, the Yen and Gold. read more
- Tables & Charts for Friday, Jul 23rd, 2010
- Bill Cara’s Blog for July 23, 2010 [See post-close report] Morning Call [7:57am ET] Today’s focus will be on Europe. Following the close today in Europe at 1600 GMT (11:00am ET), the London-based Committee of Banking supervisors (CEBS) will release the new stress test results of 91 banks, which together account for 65% of all EU banking assets. The stress test methodology is based on factors such as capital needed by a bank should (i) EU’s GDP fall by -3%, (ii) sovereign debt be required to be written down by certain percentages, (iii) etc. read more
Slope Of Hope with Tim Knight
- Hitting Turbulence (by Springheel Jack) After the fast bleed up of the last few days I'm expecting to see a return to serious volatility during the next few days. I'm not sure of the direction, but looking at USD particularly I'm expecting that we may see some significant moves down, though longer term I'm still leaning firmly bullish on equities. On the GBPUSD daily chart we can see that the top of the strong rising channel has almost been reached. I am expecting to see a return to the bottom of the channel once it is hit and I'm expecting to see a parallel move...
- The Final Throes of (...no, no, not wave 2....) the Comme... Good evening, hard-core Slopers and Slopettes! The official Tim Knight comment system is nearing its birth, but we need your help as midwives. There have been a number of improvements, including: + Elimination of some nasty-ass bugs; + Ability to crop your profile picture; + Most important, the ability to choose from three styles of updating: Show in Place - which is the smart kind that keeps that hierarchy intact and apparently drives people crazy Show Separately - which blithely tacks on new comments to the end Disabled - which doesn't update automatically at all There will, in the weeks...
- Video Chart Analysis on Gold (Mike Paulenoff) Originally published on MPTrader.com
- The Death Cross: Is It Credible? (By Ryan Mallory) Much has been made of the recent 50-day moving average that crossed below the 200-day moving average on the S&P. Among individual stocks, when the 50/200 cross occurs to the downside, many traders take it as a sign to get out of the stock immediately, or to start a new short position. With that being said, and the failed attempt, to-date by the bears to drive this market lower in the wake of a the 50/200 death cross, I asked myself, is this even a legitimate phenomenon that we should be paying attention to? Is there a legitimate play that...
- Bang! Margin Weighted DATR (by Trade Flight Plan) A couple months ago, we posted our last analysis of the dollarized daily average true range (DATR) across the most popular futures instruments. With the incredible moves in the markets lately, it's time for another update. At the suggestion of another sloper (excellent suggestion by the way), we revised our analysis to reflect margin weighted dollarized average true range (mwDATR). We show the mwDATR as a percentage. This is the return on investment percent (ROI) possible in a trading day, based on the dollarized average daily moves of each futures instrument relative to the initial margin/performance bond requirements set by...
- Resolved: We. Are. Civilized. I suppose that having the surname of "Knight" has foisted upon me a certain ethic and point of view; below is one of my favorite monologues - - a bit melodramatic, yes, but enjoyable nonetheless - - of King Arthur professing his inner conflict and turmoil. And, if not for inner conflict and turmoil, there would be no me! So watch it.....
- Harry Boxer's Charts of the Day Originally published on TheTechTrader.com
- Utilities Seems Like Good Risk/Reward
- Gold - The Battle is Already Won Warning Slopers... GOLD BUG ALERT!! ;-) This morning's email from gold general Jim Sinclair - under siege yet again from the troops in the "community" - prompts this morning's post. Mr. Sinclair often writes with a war mentality pitting the gold community against the evil bullion banks - and a good chunk of the rest of the financial world. Don't get me wrong, I think there is plenty of evil out there (it seems that on Mondays following a meeting or conspiracy of the assembled dignitaries in the G20 my investment accounts take the hit) but apparently a good chunk...
- The Value of Thin Bets Each morning, before the market opens, I fire up my trading platform to see what's happening. Invariably, I'll see some positions with gigantic "losses", because the bid/ask data is just plain silly (e.g. for a $15 stock, it might show a $10 bid and a $20 ask, until such time as the market is actually open). So most of these are false scares. One of them this morning - APL - was not. This was a short of mine, and it was getting bought for a 35% premium. Not a great way to start the day! However, this position represented...
the evil speculator - one nefarious trade at a time
- Getting Closer We’re definitely getting closer but I don’t think we’re there just yet. A drop right here and now would be juicy and today’s little sell off sure makes it look like this thing is about to roll over. So is it really downhill from here or are looks deceiving? Whatever you do – stay away from [...]
- Wednesday Road Map Since it’s still the summer doldrums and many of you guys have mentally checked out I will afford myself a quick drive through update for Wednesday. Here we go: Basically the same picture as presented in yesterday’s update. Today looked like a bit of topping action and after an early morning spike (don’t we love those) we [...]
- Embrace The Pain I know it’s summer and there are probably ten thousand more interesting things to do watch than this tape melting up like an ice-cream cone in Central Park. My personal favorites would be hot babes in bikinis at the beach, reruns of Star Trek – The New Generation reruns, any 3D movie in the theaters [...]
- Naughty Bears I am sure that many of you reading my posts have had their share of bearish frustration in the past year or so. It’s tough to be a bear – especially in bear markets. Now, I know this may sound a bit counter intuitive but think about it. In bull markets you actually get pretty [...]
- EWP Option Strategies – Part 4 Alright, Evil Rat Academy is officially in session – and it’s again a good time as there is not much to do but to watch Soylent Blue inflict its monetary and psychological damage on the bears. But moping and complaining is not something we advocate here at the evil lair. So, let’s make this again [...]
- Penny For Your Thought The summer of pain is upon us – although some of you still believe in miracles I personally don’t think that the bulls are going to let this juicy opportunity to torment the bears slip through their fingers. Copper has long been and remains to be one of the most reliable litmus tests on the global [...]
- Charlie Brown Day One of the side benefits of being a paranoid market megaolmaniac is that if the worst case scenario actually comes through you are at least mentally prepared. Once more the bulls pulled a textbook Lucy van Pelt on the bears – if you dared to chase the tape down yesterday you’re probably feeling a sharp [...]
- Orange Peel Freebie Alert! Our friends at Elliott Wave International have just announced the beginning of their wildly popular FreeWeek event, where they throw open the doors for you to test-drive some of their most popular premium services — at ZERO cost to you. You can access EWI’s intraday, daily, weekly and monthly forecasts from EWI’s Energy Specialty Service [...]
- Wednesday Road Map I’m going to do a quick and dirty one tonight – let’s get right to it: Talking about quick and dirty – let me introduce you to Mr. Porky, the new head of our Evil Lair Complaint Department. Make sure you phrase your inquiries politely – let’s just say he has a unique ‘touch’ in how [...]
- When Bullish Is Bearish Some of you over eager grizzlies might have become a bit frustrated with all the whipsaw. I do see renewed signs of frustration in the comment stream and although I can surely empathize I must point out that I have been insisting to play this thing on a long term basis. Some of you have [...]
the ELLIOTT WAVE lives on
- wednesday update SHORT TERM: consolidation/pullback continues, DOW -40 Overnight the Asian markets were mostly higher. Europe opened higher but closed -0.65%. US index futures were relatively flat overnight, and at 8:30 Durable goods orders were reported lower: -1.0% v -0.6%. The market opened slightly to the downside at SPX 1112 and then bounced to the high for the day at 1115 in the opening minutes. A pullback followed to the SPX 1107, three points below yesterday's low, by 10:30. After hitting a slightly oversold short term condition at that point the market tried to rally. Around 1:00 the SPX hit 1112 and then started drifting down ahead of the release of the Beige book at 2:00: http://www.federalreserve.gov/fomc/beigebook/2010/20100728/default.htm. After the report the market headed lower, hitting SPX 1103 around 3:30 and then bounced a bit to close at 1106. For the day the SPX/DOW were -0.55%, and the NDX/NAZ were -0.95%. Bonds gained 18 ticks, Crude dropped 75 cents, Gold added $5.00, and the USD was lower. Support for the SPX slips to 1090 and then 1058, with resistance at 1107 and then 1136. Short term momentum pulled back from extremely overbought early yesterday to slightly oversold today. Tomorrow, the weekly Jobless claims at 8:30. The market continued to pullback today from the recent rally high at SPX 1121. When hitting today's low at SPX 1103, this pullback (18 points) is now a bit more than the usual 10 - 15 point pullbacks that normally occur during good rallies. With the SPX yet to confirm an uptrend, and lots of green labels on its chart, we updated the already confirmed DOW hourly chart with a similar count and normal labels. The count remains the same: Int. waves i-ii and Minor waves 1-2. This recent high could be either the completion of Minor wave 3 or Minute wave one. We have posted both labels in green on the SPX/DOW hourly charts. It will take some additional market activity to determine which is the correct label. During this pullback the hourly chart RSI is now slightly oversold and the daily RSI has had a nice little pullback as well. This suggests the market should be close to ending this decline and should resume its advance shortly. Best to your trading! MEDIUM TERM: DOW in uptrend LONG TERM: bull market CHARTS: http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/Favorites.CServlet?obj=ID1606987
- tuesday update SHORT TERM: market consolidates after recent rally, DOW +12 Overnight the Asian markets were mixed. Europe opened higher and closed +0.25%. US index futures were higher overnight, and at 9:00 the Case-Shiller index was reported rising: +4.6% v +3.8%. The market opened higher and rallied to SPX 1121 in the opening minutes. That was the high for the day and a new high for the rally from SPX 1011. With an extremely overbought short term condition the market started to pullback. At 10:00 Consumer confidence was reported waning: 50.4% v 52.9%. The pullback continued until about 11:30 when the SPX hit 1110. Another rally attempt followed but the SPX could only reach 1116 by 12:00. By 1:30 the SPX had pulled back to a higher low at 1111, rallied again to 1116 by 3:30, and then ended the day at SPX 1114. For the day the SPX/DOW were mixed, and the NDX/NAZ were -0.20%. Bonds lost 14 ticks, Crude slid $1.55, Gold dropped $24.00, and the USD was higher. Support for the SPX remains at 1107 and then 1090, with resistance at 1136 and then 1146. Short term momentum was extremely overbought this morning and dropped below overbought during the day. Tomorrow, Durable goods orders at 8:30, then the FED's Beige book at 2:00. Today's opening rally took the SPX to it highest level since the rally began earlier this month. In the 3+ weeks since the SPX 1011 low, the market has rallied 110 points to SPX 1121 or nearly 11%. The DOW is the first of the four major US indices to confirm an uptrend. We're expecting the other three to follow shortly. Currently 6 of the 13 foreign indices we follow are in confirmed uptrends. And,5 of the 9 SPX sectors are in confirmed uptrends along with the NYAD, NYA and TRAN. It certainly appears the two "buy" signals the market generated over the past few weeks, which usually precede uptrend confirmations, will be spot on again. Short term OEW charts remain positive and impulsing. We continue to count this advance as Intermediate wave one (SPX 1099) off the SPX 1011 low, and then Intermediate wave two (SPX 1057). From the SPX 1057 low, Intermediate wave three is underway with, Minor wave 1 (SPX 1089), Minor wave 2 (SPX 1065) and Minor wave 3 underway. Best to your trading! FWIW, this is not a new format, hopefully. We have not made any changes. MEDIUM TERM: DOW uptrending LONG TERM: bull market CHARTS: http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/Favorites.CServlet?obj=ID1606987
- monday update SHORT TERM: DOW confirms an uptrend as rally continues, DOW +101 Overnight the Asian markets were mostly higher. Europe opened higher and closed +0.60%. US index futures were relatively flat overnight. At the open the market was relatively unchanged hitting SPX 1104, friday's high, and then dipping to 1101 in the first few minutes. After this hesitant beginning the market started to rally. At 10:00 New homes sales were reported higher: 330K v 300K. The rally continued, with only small pullbacks, until just past noon when the SPX hit 1113. After that the market went sideways for a while and then dipped down to 1008 by 3:00. Another rally followed, into the close, as the SPX hit 1115 and closed there. For the day the SPX/DOW were +1.05%, and the NDX/NAZ were +1.00%. Bonds were up ticks, Crude was flat, Gold slid $7.00, and the USD was lower. Support now notches up to 1107 and then 1090, with resistance at 1136 and then 1146. Short term momentum remains extremely overbought. Tomorrow, Case-Shiller housing prices at 9:00, then Consumer confidence at 10:00. Overnight another foreign index confirmed an uptrend raising the number to 6 of 13. The US market opened quietly and gradually extended the recent rally to SPX 1113, and then 1115 at the close. Currently the market is extremely overbought short term and a 10 SPX point pullback, or more, can occur at anytime. Nevertheless, this rally from the SPX 1011 low, in early July, is very close to confirming its first uptrend since April. With the technicals continuing to improve this uptrend should be Major wave one of Primary wave III. Best to your trading! MEDIUM TERM: DOW is uptrending, SPX is next LONG TERM: bull market CHARTS: http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/Favorites.CServlet?obj=ID1606987
- weekend update REVIEW The market had another strong week while economic indicators continue to erode. First the economic front. While economic reports were sparse this week they were mostly heading in the wrong direction. Weekly jobless claims rose, the monthly BEA leading indicators declined, and our WLEI declined again. In addition, the home builders index declined, along with housing starts and existing home sales. The only positive on the week was the rise in building permits. Nevertheless the market had a strong week, the SPX/DOW were +3.4%, and the NDX/NAZ were +4.0%. The foreign markets also rose, with Asia +2.3%, Europe +2.4%, and the Commodity equity group +4.0%. Bonds dropped 0.4%, Crude gained 3.7%, Gold dropped 0.3%, and the USD was flat on the week. The upcoming week will be highlighted by the Case-Shiller home prices index, the FED's Beige book, and our first look at Q2 GDP. LONG TERM: bull market Last week we covered why we are tracking the advance from the March 2009 SPX 667 low as a bull market. This week we will reveiw our working SPX weekly chart of the previous bull market, (2002-2007), the bear market, (2007-2009), and current bull market. This chart, along with 200+ others, are available in the link at the bottom. Before we get started we would like to mention that the world is so intertwined these days that very little occurs in isolation. Markets halfway around the world can impact the world's markets for a day, a week or even months. Currencies can and do impact stock markets, as well as interest rates. To keep in tune with worldwide events on a technical basis we publicly cover the US, many of its sectors, and thirteen key foreign markets. We also track the USD index, seven foreign currencies, US interest rates, commodities, the precious metals, and currently 40+ stocks. Everything we cover has a daily and weekly chart, except the SPX and DOW. They also have hourly and monthly charts. Naturally, anything we expect to occur in the US should also be supported by similar events in the rest of the world. Markets can not be analyzed in isolation. We started this blog in mid-2005, when most of the EW'ers were bearish, and our bullish projections were not easily accepted. Five years later we again appear to be at a similar juncture. During the 2002-2007 bull market OEW quantified the waves and we labeled them. Notice the MACD stayed above neutral throughout, the 13 EMA stayed above the 34 EMA except for an occassional dip below, and the RSI formed divergences at many of the wave peaks and some of the wave bottoms. The entire bull market was a Primary wave V, with five Major waves and the fifth Major wave extended. After the 2007 top everything started to reverse. The MACD dropped below neutral, the 13 EMA broke through the 34 EMA, and the RSI never got overbought spending most of its time oversold. OEW quantified the waves and we counted a 5-3-5 zigzag into the Mar 09 low. At that low we had a positive divergence on the MACD and RSI. Since that low the MACD has been staying above neutral, the 13 EMA has spent most of its time above the 34 EMA, and the RSI again is getting overbought with divergences at the wave peaks. Technically, 2009-2010 looks a lot like 2002-2007 and nothing like 2007-2009. In addition, we count five waves up from the Mar 09 low to complete a bullish Primary wave I, and the recent Primary wave II correction is more complex and steeper than the two previous corrections, Major waves 2 and 4. After nearly thirty years of Elliott Wave analysis, and having examined every wave during the past now 125 years of historical data, the highest probability for this type of market activity is a classic Elliott Wave bull market. A much, much lower probability would be assigned to a bear market rally. Yet, most EW'ers are bearish! MEDIUM TERM: downtrend low SPX 1011 While OEW was quantifying the waves during the advance from March 2009 to April 2010 we observed that both Major wave corrections were simple, took about one month, and declined about 9%. After OEW confirmed the downtrend the market experienced that one day 'flash low' selloff/rebound. Shortly after that event in early May, we projected that the correction would last a few months, identified three potential fibonacci retracement levels, and expected the end of the correction to coincide with the four year presidential cycle low. Our target for a bottom was either July or October, and the retracement levels were: 38.2% at the OEW 1007 pivot, 50.0% at the OEW 944 pivot, or 61.8% at the OEW 876 pivot. As the correction unfolded we noted a double bottom at the OEW 1041 pivot in early June and marked that the end of Major wave A. A 50% retracement rally then unfolded into late June and we marked that Major wave B, of the ongoing three Major wave - Primary wave II correction. The market then declined to a new low for the correction near the 38.2% retracement 1007 pivot. The rally off that low started a bit choppy but then started impulsing and generated a WROC buy signal. These buy signals have a better than 80% success rate at signalling new uptrends. With an oversold weekly MACD and a positive weekly RSI divergence, plus many other positive technicals, we suggested that the SPX 1011 low may have ended Primary wave II. We then posted a green, tentative, label on the charts. In the meantime we received our first confirmed uptrend in the SPX sectors and two foreign indices were already in uptrends. After making an initial rally high at SPX 1099 the following week, an 88 point gain from 1011, the market sold off dramatically on Ops-Ex day and found support at the next lower pivot 1058. Early this week that pivot was tested three more times before the market rallied to higher highs on friday at SPX 1104. We had labeled the SPX 1099 level as Intermediate wave one last week, and the SPX 1057 level as Intermediate wave two this week. From that tuesday low we should now be in Intermediate wave three. While all this was transpiring the market generated another WROC buy signal. Double signals in one month are quite rare. Several more SPX sectors confirmed uptrends pushing the number to five of nine. The NYAD confirmed an uptrend, and now five of the thirteen foreign markets we track are in confirmed uptrends. The technicals are looking quite positive for a potential OEW SPX/DOW uptrend confirmation soon. Economically, however, we have some concerns. In addition to tracking the technicals of the markets we also track a few quantifiable economic indicators. The one that is giving us the greatest concern is what we call the WLEI, weekly leading economic indicator. Generally, when this indicator is above 50% the economy is expanding, and below 50% contracting. Historically, whenever the WLEI drops to a contracting 47% or below it has been trouble for the stock market. Over the past fifty years, whenever the WLEI has dropped to 47% or lower the market has corrected about 20% or more and often entered a bear market. This week the WLEI dropped to an alarming 39.5%. Since the market has already corrected about 17% during the past three months and has started to advance again. We reviewed the historical data to find two other similar events. In 1990 and 1998 the WLEI dropped below 47% and the market corrected about 20%. In 1990 a shallow recession followed but the bull market continued. In 1998 there was no recession and the bull market continued. What we also noticed was that after the market finished its correction, in both 1990 and 1998, the WLEI started to improve the following month and eventually turned positive again as the market continued higher. What this analysis suggests. If the market has indeed ended this correction at SPX 1011 we will need to see some improvement in the WLEI in August to continue this stock market advance into September. If not, the recent low may only be Major wave A of Primary wave II, and this potential uptrend Major wave B. This count would suggest a 4 year cycle low bottom in October with a retest of the OEW 1107 pivot or lower. Our goal is to be as objective as possible by including as much quantitative data as possible. This sometimes will mean some slightly mixed signals during some junctures of bull and bear markets, allowing for potential alternate counts. For now the highest probability is that the bull market is resuming. After we get an OEW uptrend confirmation we'll address these other indicators as the uptrend unfolds. Until then we are still working with probabilities. SHORT TERM Support for the SPX remains at 1090 and then 1058, with resistance at 1107 and then 1136. Short term momentum ended the week slightly overbought. As noted earlier we labeled the SPX 1011 low as the potential end of this correction. Then we labeled SPX 1099 as Int. wave one, SPX 1057 as Int. wave two, and Int. wave three should be underway now. The OEW short term charts are positive and are displaying a small wave 1 (SPX 1089) and wave 2 (SPX 1065) off the SPX 1057 low, with wave 3 underway now. We also noted earlier that the double WROC buy signal is a rare event. This suggests an uptrend is unfolding and the likely price target is between the OEW 1187 pivot and the OEW 1291 pivot. If this potential uptrend remains impulsive the upper pivot should be reached around October. If not, the lower pivot comes into play. For now, this market still has to clear the OEW 1107 pivot before we have any chance of getting an uptrend confirmation. Important support remains at the, four times tested, 1058 pivot and key support at the 1041 pivot. This week the SPX sector XLI (industrials) confirmed an uptrend. This would suggest the DOW may be the first to confirm of the four major indices. Best to your trading! FOREIGN MARKETS Asian markets gained 2.3% on the week, all were higher. India's BSE and Hong Kong's HSI are in confirmed uptrends. European markets gained 2.4% on the week, all were higher. England's FTSE and Spain's IBEX are in confirmed uptrends. The Commodity equity group gained 4.0% on the week, all were higher. Brazil's BVSP is in a confirmed uptrend. COMMODITIES Bonds lost 0.4% on the week during its uptrend. Bond prices are displaying a negative divergence at the recent highs, but not yields. Crude gained 3.7% on the week as its uptrend continues. Gold lost 0.3% on the week while its downtrend continues. Expecting a low in August. The USD was flat on the week after a couple of volatile days. The EUR (-0.2%) and JPY (-1.1%) remain in uptrends. NEXT WEEK Monday kicks off a busy week with New homes sales at 10:00. Case-Shiller and Consumer confidence are reported on tuesday. On wednesday Durable goods orders and the FED's beige book. On thursday the weekly Jobless claims. Then on friday Q2 GDP, the Chicago PMI and Consumer sentiment. The FED has nothing scheduled at the moment. Best to you and yours this weekend! CHARTS: http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/Favorites.CServlet?obj=ID1606987
- friday update SHORT TERM: July rally extends, DOW +102 Overnight the Asian markets were all higher. Europe opened higher but closed mixed. US index futures were slightly higher overnight but headed lower into the open. Trading started the day with the SPX opening at 1091. It had closed at SPX 1094 yesterday. A choppy beginning unfolded in the first half hour of trading as the SPX hit 1089, then 1094, and finally 1088 by 10:00. That was the low for the day, right at the OEW 1090 pivot. A rally followed until noon when the SPX retested yesterday's 1098 high. A pullback to SPX 1090 followed by 1:00. Then the market surged, taking out this weeks 1098 high and last weeks 1099 high on its way to SPX 1104 by 2:00. After a pullback to SPX 1097 by 3:30 the market closed at 1103. For the day the SPX/DOW were +0.90%, and the NDX/NAZ were +0.85%. Bonds lost 15 ticks, Crude slid 25 cents, Gold dropped $8.00, and the USD was lower. Support for the SPX remains at 1090 and then 1058, with resistance at 1107 and then 1136. Short term momentum pulled back to neutral early, then was slightly overbought at the close. The WLEI was again reported lower today: 39.5% v 40.2%, and there was a downtick reported in the M1 Multiplier last night as well. The economy continues to contract. Market technicals, however, continue to improve. Currently five of the thirteen foreign indices we follow are in confirmed uptrends. Also, five of the nine SPX sectors are in confirmed uptrends. The NYAD (NYSE advance-decline) market breadth is in a confirmed uptrend as well. And, the market generated another WROC buy signal. The rally from the early July SPX 1011 low extended today to 1104. This 93 point rally is the best one since the 98 point "flash low" reflex rally in May, a couple of weeks after the correction started in April. With the market finally clearing the 1090 pivot today and resistance at 1099/1100, the count we have been tracking remains in place: Intermediate waves one (1099) and two (1057), with Minor waves 1 (1089) and 2 (1065) of Intermediate wave three. The next hurdle for this market is to clear the OEW 1107 pivot, and then, confirm an uptrend. Support remains at 1058 and key support at 1041. Best to your weekend! MEDIUM TERM: downtrend low SPX 1011 LONG TERM: bull market CHARTS: http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/Favorites.CServlet?obj=ID1606987
- thursday update SHORT TERM: the bi-polar market continues, DOW +202 Overnight the Asian markets were mixed. Europe opened lower but closed +2.20%. US index futures moved higher overnight with the rally in Europe. At 8:30 weekly Jobless claims rose to 464K v 429K. The market ignored the data and gapped up at the open to SPX 1078. It had closed at SPX 1070 yesterday after retesting, for the fourth time, the OEW pivot at 1058. As the rally continued, at 10:00 annualized Existing home sales were reported lower: 5.37 mln v 5.66 mln, and the BEA Leading indicators were reported lower as well: -0.2% v +0.4%. Around 11:00 the SPX rallied right to the upper limit of the OEW 1090 pivot range (1097) and then started to pullback. By 12:00 the pullback bottomed at 1092, only five points lower, and the market started rising again. Around 2:30 the SPX hit 1098, went sideways for a while, then pulled back to 1089 in the last half hour of trading. A bounce into the close ended the day at SPX 1094. For the day the SPX/DOW were +2.10%, and the NDX/NAZ were +2.60%. Bonds lost 10 ticks, Crude rallied $2.55, Gold added $3.00, and the USD was lower. Support for the SPX rises to 1090 and then 1058, with resistance at 1107 and then 1136. Short term momentum rose from slightly oversold to slightly overbought during the day. Tomorrow, there are no economic reports nor FED activities scheduled. The Pavlovian market activity for the past week of sell, sell, sell - buy, buy, buy, continued today. It all started with last friday's expiration day gap down open and selloff. Since then the market has had three gap openings with two total intraday reversals. During this period of time the OEW 1058 pivot range has been tested four times. While this bi-polar market activity has unfolded, some of the technicals we follow have continued to improve. In overseas markets we now have four foreign indices, of the thirteen we follow, in confirmed uptrends: BSE, FTSE, HSI and IBEX. Also three of the nine SPX sectors are now in confirmed uptrends: XLB, XLF and XLU. Today's action took the SPX up to the upper range of the two pivots, (1058 and 1090), the market has been trapped in for over a week. Again the short term OEW charts swung into positive territory. This time, however, the wave pattern off the SPX 1011 low is looking more and more impulsive. We can now count with a potential small 1-2 off tuesday's SPX 1057 low. This would imply we are getting close to a breakout, through the 1090 and 1107 pivots. Until this occurs remember the OEW 1058 pivot is support and the OEW 1041 pivot 'key' support. The rally high, from the SPX 1011 low, is currently SPX 1099. After a recent request we have added a section to the blog for Recent EW Studies. It covers only the special reports released in 2010. Best to your trading! MEDIUM TERM: downtrend low at SPX 1011 LONG TERM: bull market CHARTS: http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/Favorites.CServlet?obj=ID1606987
- wednesday update SHORT TERM: gap up early, pullback late, DOW -110 Overnight the Asian markets were mostly higher. Europe opened higher and closed +0.90%. US index futures were higher overnight and the market gapped up at the open to SPX 1089, right at the OEW 1090 pivot. The SPX had closed at 1083 yesterday. That was the high for the day. As trading continued the market pulled back to SPX 1078 by 11:30, and then started rising while awaiting FED chairman Bernanke's Congressional testimony. Nearing 2:00 the SPX was trading around 1085 when the testimony was released: http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/testimony/bernanke20100721a.htm. The market immediately started to sell off. At 3:00 the SPX hit 1065, back to within the OEW 1058 pivot range. Fourth day in a row now the SPX has tested this pivot. A bounce into the close followed and the SPX finished at 1070. For the day the SPX/DOW were -1.20%, and the NDX/NAZ were -1.40%. Bonds gained 12 ticks, Crude dropped $1.20, Gold slid $8.00, and the USD was higher. Support for the SPX remains at 1058 and then 1041, with resistance at 1090 and then 1107. Short term momentum was slightly overbought this morning and was slightly oversold in the afternoon. Tomorrow, at 8:30 the weekly Jobless claims, then at 10:00 Existing home sales plus the BEA Leading indicators. Also, FED chairman Bernanke's testimony continues. The gap up this morning took the SPX right to the OEW 1090 pivot and then the market started to pullback. After Bernanke's testimony the market headed straight down past the 1075 level and back to the OEW 1058 pivot range again. Looking back, this market has now spent the past two weeks essentially between these two pivots. We continue to believe the market is currently building a base after the initial rally from SPX 1011 to 1099. The next couple of days should be important for this potential new uptrend scenario. Remember support at is the 1058 pivot and key support at the 1041 pivot. The short term OEW charts have flipped to a negative bias again. Best to your trading! MEDIUM TERM: downtrend low SPX 1011 LONG TERM: bull market CHARTS: http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/Favorites.CServlet?obj=ID1606987
- tuesday update SHORT TERM: market rallies after gap down opening, DOW +76 Overnight the Asian markets were mixed. Europe opened higher but closed -0.40%. US index futures were lower overnight. At 8:30 Building permits were reported higher: 586K v 574K, but Housing starts were reported lower: 549K v 593K. At the open the market gapped down to yesterday's low at SPX 1061. It had closed at SPX 1071 yesterday. The pullback continued in the opening minutes when the SPX hit 1957, the low for the day. Then the market started to rally. At 10:00 FED governor Tarullo's Senate testimony was released: http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/testimony/tarullo20100720a.htm. FED director Roseman's Congressional testimony was released last night: http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/testimony/roseman20100720a.htm. Also at 10:00 the FED made the following press release: http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20100720a.htm. Around 11:30 the SPX traded close to yesterday's close at 1069. Another pullbakck followed for about 5 points to SPX 1064 by 12:30. Then the market rallied into positive territory on the day. With only a small pullback on the way, the SPX rallied to 1084 in the last hour and closed at 1083. For the day the SPX/DOW were +0.95%, and the NDX/NAZ were +1.15%. Bonds were up 2 ticks, Crude gained 85 cents, Gold rallied $11.00, and even the USD was higher. Support for the SPX remains at 1058 and then 1041, with resistance at 1090 and then 1107. Short term momentum continued to move higher after friday's oversold condition and hit slightly overbought near today's highs. Tomorrow, FED chairman Bernanke's two day, semi-annual, Congressional Monetary Policy Testimony begins. Today's gap down took the SPX down to the OEW 1058 pivot again, at 1057. Third day in a row the SPX had made a low at this pivot. In the afternoon the market rallied above the SPX 1075 level, as noted yesterday, turning the short term OEW charts positive again. This market may have completed Intermediate wave two, of the new potential uptrend we've been tracking, at today's low. To continue this scenario the market will next need to take out friday's high at SPX 1091, and then, the recent high at SPX 1099. Again the 1058 pivot is support and the 1041 pivot is key support. Upside resistance is now at the OEW 1090 pivot, the levels just noted, and the 1107 pivot. Once the market clears the 1107 we'll probably get an OEW uptrend confirmation. Best to your trading! MEDIUM TERM: downtrend low at SPX 1011 LONG TERM: bull market CHARTS: http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/Favorites.CServlet?obj=ID1606987
- monday update SHORT TERM: market consolidates after Op-EX selloff, DOW +57 Overnight most of the Asian market were lower. Europe opened lower and closed -0.35%. US index futures bounced around overnight and came into the open higher. The market opened at SPX 1068 and then moved to 1073 by 10:00. At 10:00, the Home builders index was reported lower and still bouncing along the bottom: 14 v 17. The market then pulled back to SPX 1061 by 11:00, the low for the day, and tried to rally. A choppy advance followed with the SPX hitting 1070 by 1:00, 1065 by 1:30, then the high for the day 1075 by 3:00. Another pullback followed to SPX 1068 by 3:30, then the market bounced to close at 1071. For the day the SPX/DOW were +0.60%, and the NDX/NAZ were +0.90%. Bonds were off 6 ticks, Crude gained 55 cents, Gold dropped $4.00, and the USD was higher. Support for the SPX remains at 1058 and then 1041, with resistance at 1090 and then 1107. Short term momentum was quite oversold on friday and was rising throughout the day. Tomorrow, Building permits and Housing starts at 8:30. Then Senate testimony by FED governor Tarullo at 10:00, followed by Congressional testimony by FED director Roseman at 2:30. The market rallied this morning on a mid-day rally in Europe, but then pulled back to a slightly lower low than friday at SPX 1061. Let's call this a retest of the OEW 1058 pivot. Another rally attempt followed with the SPX hitting 1075 near 3:00 and then the market pulled back some into the close. The OEW short term charts now require a rally over the SPX 1075 level to turn positive again. We were close today but faded in the last hour. Support at the OEW 1058 pivot held for the second day in a row. Important support is at the 1041 pivot. Best to your trading! MEDIUM TERM: downtrend low at SPX 1011 LONG TERM: bull market CHARTS: http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/Favorites.CServlet?obj=ID1606987
- another view of the economy/stock market Today we examine a much neglected but important piece to the stock market and the economy, the Dow Jones Utilities Average (UTILS). Historically, the UTILS have been a good indicator for energy demand within the economy. When an economy is growing it requires more energy, and less when contracting. State regulation of utilities has also played its part throughout the last century. Passing along the increased costs of generating energy, at times, has been difficult for this sector. However, in recent years this has been a less of an issue. Overall, as you will see, the UTILS reflect the actual economy a lot better than either the DOW or the SPX. The following chart displays the entire history of the UTILS from Jan 1929, when the index was first reported on a daily basis, to present. As you will observe the UTILS topped in 1929 near 145. It then went into a 13 year bear market, bottoming in 1942 near 11, losing 92.4% of its value. It didn't bottom after three years like the DOW in 1932. It bottomed after the DOW had already completed Cycle waves I and II in 1942. This suggests that the downturn in the "real" economy, the great depression, lasted until the US entered WW II in 1942. Since the DOW and the UTILS were then out of sync by ten years, and since 1942 the UTILS have participated in all the major downturns with the DOW. This suggests that the great depression was a significant and rare event. Not something that comes along every 70 or 80 years. From the 1942 low we have labeled the chart using OEW. Between 1942 and 1965 the UTILS rose in a five wave structure which we have labeled Cycle wave [1]. Then, between 1965 and 1974 the UTILS lost 64.6% of its value during Cycle wave [2]. The typical loss for the DOW during Cycle wave bear markets is about 50%. From 1974 to 2000 we have another 20+ year bull market which we have labeled Cycle wave [3]. Then between 2000 and 2002 the UTILS lost 59.7% of its value during Cycle wave [4]. Also of note is the UTILS relationship to the Commodity cycle. It made a significant low during each commodity bull market. Commodity bull markets: 1933-1946 - low 1942; 1967-1980 - low 1974; and 2001-2014 - low 2002. From the Cycle wave [4] 2002 low we labeled the next bull market as Primary wave I ending in 2007. The reason we used this label is Primary wave I of both Cycle waves [1] and [3] were 3 - 4 year bull markets and they remained in a long term OEW uptrend throughout, just like this five year bull market: 2002-2007. Then, since Primary wave II in both Cycle wave bear markets lasted 2 - 3 years we have tentatively labeled the 2009 low as Primary wave II. Also, the 48.6% decline in the UTILS was less than the 50+% declines in both the SPX and DOW. This decline is more in line with a Primary wave correction than its typical Cycle wave declines of nearly 60%. Note, we have not received a long term OEW uptrend confirmation yet off the 2009 low. In summary, if we are in or heading into a major deflationary depression it is certainly not being reflected in this index. The 2007-2009 bear market has, thus far, been milder than either the 2000-2002 bear market or the 1965-1974 bear market. And, the UTILS are certainly not displaying any signs of the great depression bear market of 1929-1942. In fact, the recent bear market looks quite ordinary in comparison to the previous three major downturns. Currently it looks like the UTILS have a good chance at confirming a long term uptrend soon. We are counting this potential bull market as Major wave 1 of the always potentially explosive Primary wave III. Going forward this index looks like a good one to track for the economy as a whole. Also note, the SPX sector XLU tracks the UTILS quite effectively.
The Technical Take
- Morning News Notes: 7/28/2010 The "Morning News Notes" as prepared by TL...US Treasury auction today, Shanghai Stock Exchange, action by Moody's on banks, US debt, Gulf oil, IMF sees signs of slowing in global economy, and gold tumbles.Just click on the link or the coffee mug below."Morning News Notes": July 28, 2010.
- Gold Technicals This will be a comprehensive review of gold technicals utilizing the SPDR Gold Trust (symbol: GLD).Figure 1 is a weekly chart of GLD with key pivot points. As we know, key pivot points are the most important areas of support (buying) and resistance (selling). With today's sell - off, GLD is below support levels at 115.07. Old support becomes new resistance. Support can be found at the 40 week moving average or more likely at the next levels of key pivot support at 108.5.Figure 1. GLD/ weeklyFigure 2 is a daily chart of GLD with key pivot points. For the better part of the past month, GLD has been breaking through support levels. Price is currently at the next level of support of 113.55. As prices are very oversold on the daily time frame, there is a good possibility of bounce back into old support (new resistance) levels between the zone of 115.49 (daily) and 115.07 (weekly).Figure 2. GLD/ dailyFigure 3 is a 60 minute chart of GLD; once again key pivot points are noted. The dashed lines are daily support and resistance levels (from figure 2) and the solid lines represent the key weekly levels. It is pretty clear from this shot that GLD has little support below the current levels. It is also worth noting that this looks a bit like an head and shoulder topping pattern. The neck line would be the current weekly resistance level. From the top of the pattern to the neck line is about 7 GLD points. Once prices bounce back to the neck line -remember we are oversold on the daily chart - look for another 7 point drop into the 108 support area.Figure 3. GLD/ 60 minuteHow concerning is this correction in gold and in GLD? If you are looking to buy GLD, these are the kind of corrections I would look for. Support levels get broken; stops are taken out and prices ricochet back in the other direction. This will be a good opportunity for those who have been patient.But there is another interpretation and it doesn't have to do with gold. If I were an equity bull, I would be a little bit worried. Much of the recent equity story - that is why prices are higher today than 3 weeks ago - is built on the premise of a sustainable global recovery. Global recovery means copper is higher and oil is higher and yada, yada, yada. Yet when I look at prices today, I see both copper and oil trading into resistance and selling off modestly today. This kind of price action has me asking: is this a technical recovery, where a technical bounce in equity prices can only mean one thing - things are getting better or is this a fundamental recovery, where the improving fundamentals and economic outlook are driving prices higher? Once again, if all is good, why are gold and other commodities selling off?Lastly, while on the topic of gold, I need to do a little housekeeping. First, our strategy of buying GLD on the presence of weekly negative divergence bars yielded a losing trade (a 1.4% loss), but that trade was closed about 7 trading days ago. Second, the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (symbol: GDX) is under pressure as I wrote about last week.
- Morning News Notes: 7/27/2010 The "Morning News Notes" as prepared by TL...BP, rules to govern global banking system, CDS pricing of Euro banks, stimulus debate heats up, state tax collections, home supply to increase, US Treasury yields, and US banks.Just click on the link or the coffee mug below."Morning News Notes": July 27, 2010.
xTrends
- Oooo really? I am writing this from Yalikavak, Bodrum-Turkey. If there is a place from heaven on earth, Yalikavak is it. I came here to work on my book "xTrends" but it is almost impossible to work on anything in here. So I am going to leave soon to find a less charming place.When I saw what happened yesterday, I couldn't help I had to post this.That 100 SP points rally we had since the 'Death Cross' day was as brutal as the wild moves of 2008. But the market had to feed on something didn't she? Well there is another plate of warm meal coming to the table. Looks like, this one will be at the expense of 'Trend Line Simpletons'. Like 'Moving Average Simpletons', this crowd is too educated with discount trading books written by some ex-hedgehog named J. Iseenitall who draws trend lines through two highs or lows and continuously serves as a nutritious snack for large mamals in this dangerous ocean. Problem with such obviousness is: "If it is obvious, it is obviously wrong". While the market may go in the obvious direction for a few hours or a day, It is almost always guarantee that the opposite will soon happen, in a violent way, at the expense of millions of ill-educated simpletons. From what I see, 1110 should be tested soon. After that, bears may have a chance to mow the yard again.
- Back testing the breakdown I sold my longs at 1067 this morning because of two things:1- I need to take some time off to finish my book and relax2- If there will be a pullback to test the lows, it will come right here not higher. If this market goes higher from here, it will not come back. Do you remember the day I covered prematurely because 1070 on SPX was a level defined by a short to intermediate term xTrend? When I covered, I said if 1070 is taken out, it would immediately drop to 1015 where the larger degree xTrends crosscurrents In other words , SPX was pushed by larger degree trends to backtest the smaller degree breakdown at 1067 on SPU0. Make no mistake, no matter what happens over the short term, if you play this market on the short side from here, you have to be extra careful because you are going against the main flow what will eventually prevail until its stopped by another xTrend. I believe this move will take time and may extend as high as April highs or little higher. It will not be a straight move, there will be many short term retracements along the way. SPX 1070 is one of those points that may generate a retracement or sell off to test of the lows, even marginal new lows. Within the overall contex, this is all part of the bottoming process over the intermediate term. But also keep in mind that Bull cycle from March 2009 was terminated in March 2010. As this multimonth rounding top formation matures in coming months, the subsequent intermediate term drops will get deeper and longer each time. Time to take off, I will lurk around, drop a few lines here and there from time to time, I am sure others will fill my absence in the meantime.Good luck with your trading.
- Invisible hands... I was going to post this yesterday but it will be a waste of my time because "A man believes what he wants to believe and disregards the rest" -> the most elementary brickstone of behavioral finance. On June 29, 2010 I explained why I was getting ready to buy. As of today OEX looks like this:MonthlyDailyMy postponed remarks would mostly be about the fact that the last 4 trading days had been quite different than the previous three swing bottoms we had since April highs.May 6, May 25 and June 8 bottoms acted significantly different than July 1 bottom in a way that there was no bottoming process, the subsequent rallies were panic buying, on lighter volume and strong breath, they felt good and created ill-looking bullish sentiment.On July 1, SPX printed as low as 1011, boooooo......Under the surface it came on divergent breath, divergent momentum and there was a huge jump in bearish sentiment, mostly because of the fact that SPX undercut a formidable support around 1040 which everybody and their grannies were watching with four eyes.This is exactly where this bottom started being different. After July 1, there were two subsequent attempts to break the support, both failed. Previous three swing bottoms in May and June neither had such tests nor did they create conditions for a sustained rally.Finally yesterday SPX made its first attempt to clear 1040 area and the last few remaining sellers left the ship on it. God is my witness I would be selling with both fists today if we had a 500 points rally yesterday. But infact we didnt, we pulled back again, gave another chance for the strong hands to buy at lower levels while it kept tape readers on the sidelines. The rally was simply an attempted breakout that shifted short term momentum to the upside. In short, this bottom was different because we had some sort of process by congesting between 1035-1010 for 4 days which scared the life out of traders under suitable internal and momentum conditions.After all these intellectual reasoning, someone out there and I know the fact that, the single and the most undoubtedly powerful reason for the rally was this simple long term xTrend that took control of the financial markets for the time being. And it is the only reason all those conditions shifted to the bullish side and reason for everything else under the sun and moon. Before you get all confident on this trend line thing, let me remind you that every trend has a life span and durability. To spot possible breakouts and breakdowns as well as rejections, you must interpret the action around the trend line, the moves before and after. Anyway this was the truth I wanted to talk about but I am not sure whether it sounded shocking or not. However I am sure it will look more complicated the more you get closer to it. There are invisible hands in the market following and reading the market through the trends and they move collectively. The truth is always out there and will remain unexplained as long as there is a market to trade.
- Death Cross or Golden Cross Last Friday, 50DMA crossed below 200DMA on SP500 Many consider this technical event as a representative of bear markets. Statistics show this is just a fallacy or delusion.There were 42 Death Cross signals occurred since 1928. These signals have generated an average 12-month return of 2.4% for the S&P 500 vs. the average S&P 12-month return of 7.2% From my collective studies, I think we are on the verge of launching a gigantic sucker rally that may potentially challenge April 2010 highs on SP500. There may be marginal lows in coming days, and I will adjust my positions accordingly if this happens but keep in mind that subsequent rally will not be something like those you have seen since April highs. So in fact this Death Cross signal may very well act like a Golden-Cross soon.Happy 4th.
- Initiated ES long @ 1018 and lower For those who were interested, I initiated a long position in ES under 1018 tonight, I will be accumulating SP longs tomorrow
- 50-200 DMA crossover coming In the next few days, you will witness an interesting event.As you know 50DMA is about to cross over 200DMA on SPX and many simpletons will turn bearish after SPX dropped over 200 points, just because of this.Not to mention many systems like IBD had been giving buy signals right at the swing tops since mid April, just to invalidate them near the bottom of the moves. You know each sucker rally I talked about came on very strong breath and suckered them at the highs. IBD just switched to sell mode yesterday again.I am not trying to bash any system or group but just trying to show you what you are really facing here. The toughest bear market you have never seen before. Extreme deception is the most important characteristic of this bear market which will eventually wipe out most. Meanwhile I am getting ready to go long for a swing trade, right about this cross over happens.Again, I am not fading this or that group of people, or cross over crowd or IBD crowd. I am doing exactly what I told you for months. Sell the up days that come on strong breath, sell when crowd turns confident and bullish. Cover when they capitulate and turn confidently bearish. In doing so, always observe xTrends rules. xTrends gives the price pivots for all these conditions.We shall see...
- Will you knock her out without me? Congratulations to those who stayed short for one more day and covered or will cover at lower prices. I am going to explain the reason why I exited my shorts yesterday, but before that I want you to know that covering shorts doesn’t mean I turned bullish. If you haven't already realized what I do and how I do in bear markets, let me make it clear. I don’t speak bullish and go long for an intermediate term trade in bear markets however I take short term bullish trades from time to time.Now I am going to show my reason on OEX chart because my SPX chart is crowded.OEX monthlythat red TL corresponds to the broken backbone of SPX we talked about weeks ago.As you may know, the recent sell off has not produced internal weakness as severe as previous ones, this implies that internals already bottomed out in early June which means it is time to look for a price bottom now. Price bottom usually comes from a level lower than the first bottom where internals bottomed out, so this has to be a level lower than ES 1032 low of May 25 according to the book. BUTYeah there is always a BUT...There is this channel structure on DJI that suggested a low around SPX 1070 area. This could have intercepted the sell off and still can because this may turn into an intra-week penetration after all, we shall see at the end of the week... Therefore I didn't take chances, I exited.Now even if this level is broken on DJI, there is this long term dynamic support on OEX coming into play, as shown on the daily close-up chart below. OEX 460-470 will do it, and you can see we are almost thereOEX dailySo all in all, this gigantic rounding top formation will give me a lot more chances to short at much higher prices in coming months and it will likely happen when the majority turns hysterically bullish again.
- Closed SP short For what it is worth, I covered SP for about 140 point profitI do not want to make predictions at the moment.I will likely short back in Oct-Nov 2010
- Onwards and Upwards That was a cold shower. We had been locked out for a couple of days because someone used Admin’s unattended computer in office and deleted our access. For a $150B company, Google provides a very poor tech support, actually it doesn’t have a tech support at all. It took us countless numbers of trials and attempts to resolve the issue. I apologize on behalf of all team members. During the black-out, we received 100s of emails asking for access and permission, obviously these people did not receive our twitter messages about the situation. In case of future problems, we suggest you to follow our twitter account: http://twitter.com/xtrends We use twitter not only to distribute our articles, but to pass important developments regarding the markets real-time.Below is what Atilla was posting right before the site hacked. It’s about similarities between now and 1929-30 periods. We now have a similar liquidity crunch , most importantly price action. If you take a closer look, you will see that not only the crash of 2008 and subsequent rally resemble 1929-30 frame but other swing moves in between too.So according to this relation, we should have a few percent rally here .Whispering images from time and distance:-----------------------------------------
- When we saw the train ... Back in late March 2010, right before SP500 ran for the tulips, USD-normalized monthly charts of several world markets, including SP500 was near our long-term targets.To give you some perspective on how long and how far this bear market will possibly last, here are some of them.Note that these charts are from March 18 update. Soon after, all these ratio charts reversed from the projected targets severely, now trending solidly downward.
My Trader's Journal
- Sold September UCO Strangle I’ve waited long enough without covering my UCO shares with calls. When I finally got around to it this morning I decided to add some more downside exposure at the same time with new naked puts to go with the covered calls. Until today I couldn’t get myself to accept the premiums for the risk [...]
- Sold MS Strangle for September I’ve been patient with my little Morgan Stanley (MS) position after I bought 100 shares at $29.00 from an option assignment only to see it dive down below $22.50. They’ve made a nice comeback and might keep going, but I decided to take some profits while I can. MS could hit resistance before it gets to $28.00. On [...]
- S&P 500 Chart – Range Bound I charted the S&P 500 ($SPX) after the markets closed on Friday, 7/23/10, when it finished at 1,102.66 for the week. // The S&P 500 had another strong week this week continuing its rally since the lows on July 1st. I couldn’t find a trend line (higher highs/lows or lower highs/lows) that looked like it’s still holding true, so I [...]
- Sold More VXX Naked Puts I’m having a fantastic month so far which typically means my luck is about to run out. (The IB portion of my account got above $100k today after finishing June just above $90k, plus a $3,000 deposit I sent in early this month.) Before anyone says anything, I know that’s not an actual scientific/reasonable way [...]
- VXX Chart – Solid Support I charted VXX this afternoon a little after 3:00 pm when it was trading at $26.74. I’ve mentioned VXX a couple of times and have a two August 24 naked puts I’m sitting on. I’m considering adding some more at lower strikes. I’ve been sprinkling in a few 21-23 strike puts for some clients and [...]
- DJIA Chart – July 16, 2010 I charted the Dow Jones Industrial Average ($INDU, DJIA, $DJI) after the markets closed on Friday, 7/16/10, after it finished the week at 10,097.90. // This past week proved the trading channel is still in charge with resistance just below 10,500 and that the 200 day moving average (dma) won’t roll over too easily. My DJIA [...]
- Options Expiration – July 2010 What a crazy options expiration day today was! I took the opportunity to open four new positions as my old positions expired worthless. The options for September were already available for SPY, GES, NDAQ and EEM and my July options were far (enough) out of the money so I started with those and will catch up with UCO on Monday [...]
- Current Portfolio – July 14, 2010 I pulled my current portfolio this morning to show what I have right now going into Friday’s option expiration. I look good on my four July expiration naked puts and expect them to all stay out of the money for the next three days. My July covered calls are out of the money, except for EEM which [...]
- S&P 500 Chart – July 9, 2010 I charted the S&P 500 Index ($SPX) after the markets closed on Friday, 7/9/10, after it finished the week at 1,077.96. // As I predicted in my DJIA post last week we saw the bounce we were due for from the lower trend line. This week’s chart seems to show the opposite now that we’ve reached the upper side [...]
The Sovereign Speculator
- Dollar sell-off about over? The Swiss Franc has been the strongest non-yen, non-dollar currency, and its moves generally coincide with those of the whole “inflation trade” currency basket (CAD, AUD, NZD, BRL, EUR, etc). Its rally looks exhausted:
- CHF & EUR: 2008 dead-cat redux?
- One year later, a real head and shoulders? - Solid deflation trade on today: bonds, yen, dollar up and everything else down. This is hard selling, so it looks like we’re completing the top of the great dead cat bounce of ‘09-’10. Once stocks and commodities break May’s lows, they could fall very quickly towards the levels of winter ‘09. Here’s crude oil, continuous contract [...]
- Relief rally coming? We’ve got a clear divergence on RSI now, as each impulse lower over this week has been weaker than the last. This is a sign to tighten up stops or close shorts. You could make a decent case for a quick long trade here with a stop just under the lows, but on a wider [...]
- Is the bounce about over? Glancing around at the commodity and global stock markets, it looks like the bounce from last month’s lows has been adequate to reset psychology for another decline. This is not to say things have to drop this week, but if prices fail to push higher gravity could take over, as the general climate appears to [...]
- 2011 Dividend tax increase cuts real value of S&P500 by 30%. The S&P 500 is currently yielding about $25.50 per share annually, about 2.3% at today’s level. Sub-3% yields are a characteristic of the bubble years. Before the 1990s an index yield under 3% was very skimpy, hardly justifying the risk of capital loss. Reduced marginal taxation of 15% (with 0% and 5% rates for low-earners) [...]
- Shiller on double dip in housing, retail, personal saving. From Bloomberg:
- Iranian central bank dumps euros for gold and dollars. Remember when Iran started pricing its oil in euros instead of dollars? It was April 2008, a few months after supermodel Gisele Bunchen refused payment in dollars. The euro touched $1.60 that month and had nowhere to go but down: Yahoo! Finance Having missed out on the dollar’s spectacular comeback, the expert timers in Iran are switching [...]
- Gold shifts to negative beta vs. stocks Gold’s correlation with stocks comes and goes — sometimes it’s extremely high, sometimes negative and sometimes it has none at all. It’s been pretty high for much of the last 12 months, but has turned negative since March. At times on a minute-by-minute scale it moves almost tick for tick opposite stocks (much like the [...]
- Beck, Woods & Maltsev on Hayek Beck is an opportunist and only half libertarian, but if you can stand him this is a pretty good show, especially once the Mises Institute economists Tom Woods and Yuri Maltsev appear (hat tip Lew Rockwell):
Reigning The Nifty Through Technical Analysis
- Reigning The Nifty 29th July , 2010 Daily ChartHalf Hourly ChartThe Daily Line Chart had been showing weakness in Nifty since two days and today the uptrendline on candle charts too was broken decisively forming a bearish engulfing pattern , promising more downsides. The important 5400 level too was broken and Nifty closed below it at 5497.Oscillators are above the midpoint but moving down after showing negative divergence. The Macd has given a sell. More fall possible.The 200 period ema on half hourly charts lends support at 5385. All , 5,10,20,50 emas are bearishly aligned.Oscillators have reached the oversold region. Supports at 5375-5385-5353-5315 and Resistance at 5400-5430-5455-5477.Strong support at 5315 which is the 61.8% ( 5210-5477 rise) and the 23.6%(4786-5477) fibo levels coinciding.Happy Trading !!Lakshmi Ramachandranwww.vipreetsafetrading.com
- Reigning The Nifty 28th July , 2010 Daily Chart Half Hourly Chart Yesterday I wrote, " The Nifty needs to trade above 5427 to remain above this trendline and close above 5437".The trendline in question being the uptrendline from 4787. The Nifty traded for a while below 5427 but finally broke out and retested 5450 levels, suffered from vertigo and fell to close below 5437. The close below 5437 ensured that the breakdown from the uptrendline on Line charts continued.So the sideways movement with a downward bias continues , making marginally lower highs and lower lows for the second day in a row.The range today was 5407-5451, which makes it important support and resistance.the fall from 5451 has taken support at 5424 which is exactly at the 61.8% level of the rise from 5407 to 5451.A fall below 5424 would therefore show weakness.Nifty will show strength only above 5441, which is the 61.8% level of rise from 5424 to 5451.It is also the uptrendline support making it very important to close above this level .Negative divergences are intact on daily oscllators.The breadth was marginally negative and volumes were higher on advancing shares than on declining shares.Supports are at 5415-5407-5400-5375-5353. Resistance at 5435-5441-5451-5477. Happy Trading !!Lakshmi Ramachandranwww.vipreetsafetrading.com
- Reigning The Nifty 27th July , 2010 Daily ChartDaily Line Chart As mentioned in my post for 26th July, the bearishness of the shooting star was confirmed today by a bearish candle.Breadth was negative and volumes average. Volumes on declining stocks were higher than on advancing stocks.The uptrendline once again lent good support. This is the fifth strike on the trendline . Coupled with this is the narrowing of trading range as depicted by the rising wedge. Negative divergences on oscillators too have been cautioning bulls since some time.On line charts the trendline is already broken increasing the possibility of lower levels for the Nifty.The Nifty needs to trade above 5427 to remain above this trendline and close above 5437. Break of this trendline could be extremely bearish giving a 690 point move on the downside.A break below 5350, which is the swing low, would be further confirmation of a breakdown in the Nifty . A reversal of this view would require a breakout above the high of 5477.Strong supports are at 5400-5350-5315 and Resistance at 5450-5477-5518. Happy Trading !!Lakshmi Ramachandranwww.vipreetsafetrading.com
- Reigning The Nifty 26th July , 2010 Weekly Chart The Nifty made a higher high and higher low candle making a new high of 5477 in the rally which began in March 2009 . So the uptrend continues. The oscillators continue to show waning momentum by way of negative divergences, cautioning the bulls. Daily ChartToday's candle made a higher high and higher low but formed a shooting star which is an ominous sign of bulls losing strength. This is a potential reversal candle. The negative divergence on daily and weekly oscillators give weight to the shooting star.However, action on next trading session is necessary to confirm it's bearishness. Watch out for a bearish candle on Monday on good volumes.The 5400 level was strong resistance which has been overcome decisively. Break below this would give courage to the bears.Supports at 5412-5353-5329 and Resistance at 5477-5510.Stop Loss for positional longs at 5350 and longs with a shorter time frame at 5400.Happy Trading !!Lakshmi Ramachandranwww.vipreetsafetrading.com
- Reigning The Nifty 23rd July , 2010 Daily Chart Yesterday's "Inside Pattern" range broke out on the upside after teasing traders for most part of the trading session. Volumes were high , much higher than the last few days of consolidation. This is a positive. The immediate target should be 5479. The inverted head and shoulder target is of 5513. The Nifty is taking it's time to achieve the target.Daily oscillators have to still shake off the negative divergence. Half hourly oscillators are showing strength once again and all ema's bullishly aligned. The high of 5453 needs to be scaled decisively else the drift may start once again.Supports are at 5400-5353-5272 and Resistance is at 5453-5505-5518.Happy Trading !!Lakshmi Ramachandranwww.vipreetsafetrading.com
- Reigning The Nifty 22nd July , 2010 Daily Chart Half Hourly ChartNifty continues to be in a deep slumber turning sides groggily on extremely low volumes that is sending traders into a tizzy. The candle formed today was an inside pattern depicting indecision once again. The pattern range is 5353-5416 which needs to be broken to get a sense of direction. Breadth was marginally positive.Daily oscillators continue showing negative divergence. Half hourly charts show an elongated right shoulder forming. Oscillators are above the 50 mark showing a neutral outlook.Break above the downtrendline from the top of 5453 is proving elusive . A breakout from this short term trendline will lead to increased probability of more upsides.While break of the neckline will take the nifty to lower levels.Supports are at 5384-5353-5347-5272 and Resistance at 5400-5416-5453. Happy Trading !!Lakshmi Ramachandranwww.vipreetsafetrading.com
- Reigning The Nifty 21st July , 2010 Daily ChartHalf Hourly ChartTodays candle tells us of the tussle between bulls and bears with neither winning. The bulls succeeded early morning and kept at it till noon raising hopes of a break on the upside. The bears however gained strength after that and succeeded in a downside break from the neckline support of 5360 to end the session exactly at the up trend line support.This is bearish as the session ended at the lowest point.Volumes were low and breadth marginally negative.The break of the neckline, which held well for last 8 sessions, does not bode well. The negative divergences on all time frames have been cautioning since some time. The head and shoulder pattern with a target of 5266 has broken on the downside ( the session ended at 5357). Expect Nifty to breakdown tomorrow.The 20 dema has support at 5319 and 50 dema at 5241.The half hourly chart shows support taken at the neckline as per EOD figure.The 200 period ema has support at 5341.Supports are at 5360-5341-5332-5275. Resistance is at 5370-5416-5453.Caution to take fresh longs only on a break above 5453 continues. Positional longs may book partial profits and continue holding the remaining positions with a stop loss of 5275.Trend reversal only on a decisive break of 5200.Happy Trading !!Lakshmi Ramachandranwww.vipreetsafetrading.com
- Reigning The Nifty 20th July , 2010 Daily Chart Nifty continued the sideways movement within the making of what looks like the right shoulder of a bearish head and shoulder pattern with neckline at 5360. Volumes were very low and breadth marginally negative.The support of the uptrendline of this rally stands at 5360 for tomorrow. The 5400 level is proving stiff resistance. This range of 5360-5400 needs to be broken to give direction to Nifty. The bias at the moment is more towards breaking the 5360 level.Daily oscillators are showing negative divergence. The stochastics has drifted lower below the 50 level. Supports at 5360-5277-5225 and Resistance is at 5400-5453-5488.Happy Trading !!Lakshmi Ramachandranwww.vipreetsafetrading.com
- Reigning The Nifty 19th July , 2010 Weekly ChartThe nifty maintained the breakout above the downtrendline from January 2008 highs keeping in line with the past pattern discussed in earlier posts. The candle formed for the week shows profit booking from 5453.My reading is it was a reaction area --- the 161.8% fibo level of 5463 of the fall from 5367 to 5225--and thus profit booking .A higher high and higher low was maintained vindicating holding longs.Weekly oscillators tell a cautionary story. The negative divergences persist. Macd which is also showing negative divergence shows a silver lining as it continues to be in buy mode for the second week. Daily ChartThe breakout above 5400 eluded the Nifty as it was a touch and go at the 5401 level. Today's candle was a bullish engulfing candle, though the range of both yesterday and today are extremely small , thus reducing the reliability on it's bullishness. However today's candle stalled the bearishness of the last two days encouraging my theory of the reaction from the high of 5453 as mere profit booking rather than a trend reversal.The daily oscillators too are showing negatvie divergence forcing the longs to be cautious.The head and shoulders bearish pattern shown on half hourly charts yesterday seems to be forming the right shoulder . Neckline is at 5360.Break of the neckline can take the nifty to 5265 levels.The supports are at 5360-5345-5310-5280. Resistance is at 5400-5453-5480.Trade long with a strict stop at 5280.Those with a shorter term focus could watch the neckline break .Happy Trading !!Lakshmi Ramachandranwww.vipreetsafetrading.com
- Reigning The Nifty 16th July , 2010 Daily Chart Half Hourly ChartNifty continued to show lack of energy by making a lower top lower bottom candle with a small range of 36 points. Trade was below the 5400 mark . Advancing Volumes were greater than Declining Volumes which is a positive.Breadth was marginally negative.Volumes on the Nifty were low.Daily oscillators are starting to move down after showing negative divergence.The half hourly chart shows a bearish head and shoulder pattern which can take the nifty to 5253 levels.This is highly probable as the half hourly oscillators have not gone below their oversold levels as yet.The neckline,at 5360 levels, holding tomorrow is therefore very crucial.Weekly ChartThe weekly open was at 5352 and if Nifty closes below this level tomorrow, it would form a bearish candle.The weekly pattern which I have been discussing since sometime still holds unless 5276 is taken out.Supports are at 5360-5332-5315-5282. The 10dema offers support at 5340 and 20 dema at 5296. Resistance is at 5400-5453-5478.If already long then keep a strict stop loss of 5285. Fresh longs only on a cross of 5453. Happy Trading !!Lakshmi Ramachandranwww.vipreetsafetrading.com
The Market Oracle
- Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited: Record Quarterly Revenue The general consensus for the quarterly income for Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) was in the order of $0.40 per share, however, news just out has the figure higher at $0.64 per share for the second quarter, compared with a penny per share for the same period last year. The effect of their new mines construction programme going into production is starting to produce the results that we have been waiting for.
- Is the Future of U.S. Oil Really Secure? Marin Katusa, Chief Energy Strategist, Casey Energy Report writes: Two words that any oil company dreads to hear are “export duty.” Especially if the word “increases” or “introduced” is floating around there too. So when Kazakhstan introduced an oil export duty to meet shortfalls in the national budget, the mood wasn’t exactly jovial.
- Stock Market Distinct Four-Wave Decline The stock market indices suffered a down day today, and although they started with a brief flurry to the upside, that was about it. They sold off quickly in the morning, tested support and bounced and then consolidated, with the S&P 500 acting a bit better than the Nasdaq 100. But with Apple (AAPL) under pressure today, Nasdaq led the way down as they resumed their sell-off in the afternoon when they broke through the neckline support around the 1800 area on the NDX and 1108 on the SPX.
- Unorthodox Leverage Ideas for Gold and Silver Leverage is a very natural part of a great number of traditional investment options. Real estate investing is nearly dependent on leverage; stock traders have up to two times leverage through their brokerage accounts, futures traders are naturally highly leveraged, and currency traders use the most extreme leverage of any investor. So where does this leave the market for physical metals?
- For the Fed, Inflation is a Positive for Gold and Silver The Federal Reserve is down on its luck. It struck out with near-zero interest rates, gargantuan monetary policy measures, and particularly quantitative easing programs – which all have failed to fire. Now the public is wondering why the Reserve did anything at all. The state of the nation, it seems, is just as poor as it was some many months ago.
- Stock Market 60's Unwinding...Economy Stinks.... There's a little twist for a title. No matter what these CEO's tell you, the economy has hit the wall. The FOMC Minutes came out today, and they didn't paint a pretty picture at all. It showed how things are slowing down, and that there really isn't too much economic activity, or life, going on out there these past few months. It's scary because this earnings quarter brought about a lot of company's saying things were so good that we're raising guidance. Ouch!! Raising guidance just as things are hitting a stone wall doesn't seem like the best of timing.
- Hotel Industry Rebound Points to a Recovering U.S. Economy Martin Denholm writes: When you’re traveling, what’s your preference when it comes to accommodation? After a lengthy, recession-induced downturn, the latest industry figures suggest that more Americans are choosing hotels.
- Don't Lose Sleep over Deflation After hearing the dire warnings of deflation that have become the standard talking points of most economists, American investors may be reaching for a bottle of Prozac. I believe that their anxiety is misplaced. Unfortunately, modern economists don't understand what deflation is or why, in reality, we have much more to fear from inflation.
- Kindergarten Double Dip Recession Economics Double Dip used to pertain to ice cream cones, but now to dreaded return to economic recession. Green Shoots used to refer to gardening projects, then to deceptive economic viewpoints. My favorite is the second half recovery mantra, indicative of totally clueless. This year's promised recovery in the second half of the year will feature a return to recession instead, thus stripping mainstream economists of any remaining credibility. The endless links in the chain are impressive by the clueless cast of economists that disgrace the US landscape.
- Putting Money on the Junior Gold Miners Equities and Economics Report writer Victor Gonçalves, in this exclusive interview with The Gold Report, says the yellow metal is in its typical summer lull and will generally see more strength than weakness this year. He's enthusiastic about some undervalued juniors, saying good management is what makes or breaks these companies.
The Inflationist - Making Money in Stocks, Bonds, Forex, Commodities, Agriculture
- admin Buys PPP.AX admin Buys PPP.AX We sold 1000 Village shares at 2.06 to book $1240 in profit (after brokerage fee $20).
- India’s Bubble Disclaimer: We are short NIFTY, so our views and thoughts may be bias Whilst every economist featured on mainstream news has a view on China’s real estate bubble, little attention has been given to India. We wrote about high inflation in India and its relationship with equity markets (conclusion still open for debate) - and are bearish [...]
- 1937 versus 2007 Bear Market Comparison Update: 27 July 2010 For new readers, we posted this in Dec 2009 (Please note our targets for DJIA in BOLD underlined below): The uncanny resemblance continues (we cannot believe how this works!) By request an updated chart below - all the best navigating this treacherous market ———— 1937 vs 2007 fibonacci correlation by www.theinflationist.com 1937 vs 2007 fibonacci correlation by www.theinflationist.com 1937 vs 2007 fibonacci [...]
- Dax Listed Companies The German Dax is one of the leaders of the rally, closing at 6200 post stress test. There are so many “reasons” to explain this - a weak Euro (increasing exports), the Chinese flaunting their wealth by buying luxury german products, etc. Yet the FTSE was relatively dead few weeks ago despite the Sterling being at [...]
- Amazon Crash We have been writing about Amazon since Feb 2010 and shorting from 110 to 150 and have amassed ALOT of Amazon shorts. It is down 10% tonight , now at $107. Easily hit $80 (both technically and fundamentally), so more room to fall. For those who went in with us and are happy with the [...]
- India - The Last Man Standing We have been championing the bear cause for India for a while now - our timing is never perfect, we don’t expect it to be - and are holding our shorts and sleeping well. We said before that German’s Dax was also on steroids, but at the time of writing the Dax is getting hammered [...]
- Short NIFTY Short NIFTY 5380 $5/point. Brace for 5520 (target for bulls). We will update our thoughts on India soon.
- Elders Malcolm Jackman, CEO of Elders Limited, responded to our questions today on DearCEO. Even though our questions were fairly “heavy handed”, Malcolm took it in his strides and gave (what we thought) reassuring answers. Answer 2 seemed like a standard response - understandably so in light of potential shareholder class action. We are happy with [...]
- Minemakers - World Class Phosphate Asset Disclaimer: We hold MAK shares. Regular readers will be aware that we have been dipping our toes in phosphate company Minemakers (as usual way too early). Minemakers Investor Relations responded to a top 200 shareholder query today: Q: hi,Andrew, I started to invest in MAK since early 2007 and have seen MAK’s SP from 19c to above $2.50.Currently [...]
ETF CORNER
- I'll be back on August 1st ! Hey Kids, I'm leaving for a summer vacation in the south of Turkey in Kemer ! Gonna try some water skiing over there since my knee is finally fixed . I wont make any post for about ten days since...
- FXE : Megaphone
- EEV : Testing support
- KOL : Triangle formation for Coal
- BBH : Head 'n' Shoulder ?
- SGG : Target in sight ! I suggested buying some sugar SGG on June 11 th (Click Here) with a target of $50. I advise taking some profits on strength as out target is almost reached.
- GLD : Testing long term support
- UUP : Dollar Index
- FXA : Australian Dollar
- OIH : $80 target. A break below the green triangle would set the target for OIH at around $80.
Market Time
- S&P 500 - July 28, 2010 - Intraday Yesterday's post, I said that we might be close to some sort of correction. Seems like a correct call now. I would like the bulls to hold 1100 area, but if they can't, they should hold 1090 pivot or they may be perceived as weak.I would be concerned if the area around 55 EMA 1095 +/- which falls inside OEW 1090 pivot range did not hold.
- S&P 500 - July 27, 2010 Above the super-hyped 200 SMA!S&P has closed above the much ballyhooed 200 SMA. Many watch that moving average, many more discuss it, so I guess they should think that it is a bull market and rush to buy stocks with all they've got and all they can borrow :-)I pay more attention to the markets profile using moving averages of different lengths, line studies, range studies, etc, etc. If I had
- S&P 500 - July 24, 2010 An acceptable close to an acceptable week!This is a weekly chartIndex managed to close above my weekly MAs and above the actionary purple line. Weekly volume expanded on the way up this week. This was quite an acceptable effort from the bulls, but they need to do more. At the very least, they should end the coming week above the MAs. They should also force a MACD cross which would be a nice
- S&P 500 - July 23, 2010 - Intraday - 2 S&P's at 1102There is quite a bit of resistance between here and 1110. If I am paranoid about the attack of the bear, this is as good a spot as any for me to start looking at what I might like to do to mitigate some (or all) exposure/risk.Bulls need to get past this hurdle (1100-1110), it will be excellent to do it now and really mess up the bears, if not, they need to hold 1083-1090 on any set
- S&P 500 - July 23, 2010 - Intraday How index pulls back may tell us if we have had an ABC up or a 1-2-1-2If 1-2-1-2, 1065 area (the bottom of this swing) should not be violated.But, really, I will be concerned being long if index drops below 1075.
- S&P 500 - July 22, 2010 - Intraday Here's the headline: What a crock of you know what.yesterday, Fed-Head goes on that he is uncertain about the long term macro stuff, as if anybody really expected him to to be certain about that.He goes today that he'd do all he can if economy disappoints, as if anybody expected anything else.Why do people put so much emphasis on this crap beats the hell out of me.All I can say is thank you Mr.
- S&P 500 - July 22, 2010 - BMO - 2 If it stays like this into open, market will gap over resistance.Bulls cannot have it better than that. If they get their act together they can establish a gap up wave 3 or wave C.Now, it's up to them to show us what they can make of a good start.No complacency here. Resistance becomes 1090, support 1058, and 1070 the mid-line play field.Have a Nice day!
- S&P 500 - July 22, 2010 - BMO The future market has been at it for a few hoursIt's a long way to the open and a lot can happen, that said, if cash opens for the level of ES now, we will have a gap above 1070.Again, a lot can happen before market opens.Yesterday I said that the rise into close looked corrective. Overnight, S&P future has made a low, it may have cleared that. Small waves can become confusing when future market
- S&P 500 - July 21, 2010 Never a dull moment, eh?According to many on the web and media, Bernanke said something and people didn’t like it and they sold.Maybe.I personally think that index hit resistance around 1090, which we have pointed out ad nauseum, some started taking a nice one-day profit, and it snowballed from there – of course, Bernanke’s as good an excuse as any.We have talked about index being trapped in a
- S&p 500, July 20, 2010 Nice reversal yesterday!Let’s see if holds longer than a New York minute :-)Weekly chart is at a very interesting technical juncture.This is where the bulls have to push it. Take down the resistance, get above MAs and thou shall receive free rides from many and many bears. Fail here, and thou shall be served as dead meat.I would like to see if bulls can finally get the RSI above neutral.This is a
S2 Trading
- Wed 7/28. Possible BUY signal soon. Active SPX signal: No active signal.Hourly trend: Down.Daily trend: Up with support at 1087.88Last signal: Win. BUY signal at 1081 on 7/22 gap up with no real drawdown. Profit was taken 1/3 at 1092, 1/3 at 1099 and 1/3 at 1104. The last profit-taking spot was originally 1112ish near the 200dSMA but the NYAD small change led to full profit-taking earlier than that. Total gain was 1.6% and could have been 2% or so. 16 wins, 2 losses, 3 draws since 4/26.System Notes:Hourly stoch is well below 50 in a daily uptrend, so if stoch crosses up with price breaking 4-candle hourly pivot resistance while still above daily support at 1087.88, there will be another BUY signal. The obvious profit targets would be the 1114-1117 area (200dSMA and hourly uBB20) and the previous 1131 pivot depending on where the BUY signal occurs. If 1087.88 is broken by 1+ pt and the 15min rule, then there will likely be a SELL signal and SPX will likely target the 20dSMA currently at 1075 and rising but the 50dSMA is at 1082 so you'd be scalping 5-10 pts with quicker profit-taking.Opinion:There hasn't been much participation here and there's been no likely re-entry signal since we took profits on Monday. So, I haven't posted anything in a few days. Also, I've been working on my S2EW. As you can read in the tab above, it is largely RSI-based. I am backtesting various RSIs for numerous time periods going all the way back to 1929. I've mentioned that different chart periods (e.g. monthly, weekly or daily) and RSI periods (e.g. 5, 14 etc) work better for different time lengths and wave structures. I am trying to quantify that ideally with a formula. I hope to have some meaningful results to report in a few weeks but I suspect a comprehensive solution will take me months or even years. Meanwhile, I will chip away at it and report some of my interesting findings along the way.For instance, in the last couple days, when I applied my RSI rules to a 1929-2007 chart using one test RSI period, I determined that 2003-2007 likely completed wave 5 of 3 from 1932. Most Ellioticians believe 2000 or 2007 completed a full 5 waves from 1932. Before I tell you more, I must say that further RSI tests muddied the waters with other potential counts, so I have not yet reached a conclusion for the 1929-2007 count. However, that unique count opened my eyes to some cool stats. And, by the way, the count in the grid below calls for a w1 end in 1966 which suggests an 8-year flat into 1974 which is also different than most people count that time period but that's what 1 RSI setting told me anyway...EWStartDowFinishDowDaysDiffPriceDiffRetracew17/11/1932412/9/19661001122662441%w22/9/1966100112/9/19745703225-43%45%w312/9/197457010/11/200714198119942491%w410/11/2007141988/9/201664703225-54%57%w58/9/2016647010/25/2049160000121302473%The bolded numbers are projections using the previous pattern. Observations...First, if 1932-->1966 was wave 1 and 1974-->2007 was wave 3, then the above chart tells us wave 1 and wave 3 were 98% the same in time and price length. That does not make me support the count that wave 3 from 1932 ended in 2007 especially since w3 is slightly shorter and less steep, but you must admit that is frickin' incredible.Second, you can see that assuming w4 started on 10/11/2007, the retrace percentage has already eclipsed w2. That plus the fact the retrace is well over 50% makes the w4 count suspicious but not definitely ruled out. If the w4 count turns out to be preferred, the deep 57% retrace would suggest we've seen the low already and maybe we'll get a triangle or other complex correction.Third, if w4 were to equal w2 in this scenario, the projected completion would be on 8/9/2016. I have found a lot of credible historical, long-term and cyclical evidence that suggests the US economy will struggle until at least 2012 and possibly to 2016-2020, so that fits well with the 8/9/2016 target and does not necessitate new stock market lows.Fourth, using the average time and price of w1 and w3 which are 98% the same anyway, wave 5 should not end until nearly 2050 at Dow=160,000. You read that correctly! The books calling for Dow 30,000 may be underestimating a bit. Maybe this means inflation will strike. Maybe this means the China population spending peak in 2035 and India population spending peak in 2050 will keep things revved up and maybe the commodity cycle fits too as Tony at OEW has projected. The US is hitting its population spending peak now just as Japan did in the late 80s which explains much of the economic weakness. So, whatever the count, the 2 legs up from 1932 fit nicely with a projected Dow explosion into 2050ish. And, if it is a wave 5, the real heartache will occur at that point in an ABC down likely for decades. And, that seems to fit perfectly with an aging American empire, a peaked China and India and tapped out emerging and oil-based economies.Still, I've not picked a count for 1932-->2007 but the study is opening my eyes to more possibilities. Assuming my 5-wave count for 2007-->2009 still sticks after my study concludes, there is likely another wave down needed to test or break the March 2009 low, but the above grid suggests it could drag out to 2016 and not fall nearly as low as many Elliotticians think...may even turn into a humongous triangle with each leg lasting 1-2 years. Yes, some will say triangles can't have 5-wave legs, but my study may change 2007-2009 as 3 waves or maybe that was merely A of the first ABC leg of a 10-year triangle, and I don't believe the original Elliott rules limited triangle legs to 3 waves anyway and now some allow 5-waves on LDTs, so I guess I'm saying there are numerous ways a triangle can occur even after the 2007-2009 impulsive-looking drop but hopefully my study will narrow the possibilities. And, maybe like Nasdaq led the tech crisis down, SPX will lead the financial crisis further down while the Dow holds up relatively better. In fact, one part of my study suggested Dow and SPX may be on different long-term counts but we'll see how my study turns out. Good luck.
- Sat 7/24. Re-evaluation. (Update Mon 9:45 AM)I am bumping the LDT count down in preference. My lines indicate that SPX is bumping into the max upper line of the LDT, but I'd say that makes it more of a channel than a triangle and wave 4 is longer than wave 2 in terms of points which is not a S2EW rule but goes against an EW guideline. I am not eliminating the LDT count becaise it may be useful as a channel or could evolve into an expanding LDT.The 1-2-1-2 count is not technically eliminated until 1131 is surpassed, and the charts show more of an ABC look now from 1011, so I am keeping this count. I also see a potential EDT 5th of C into this morning's high, but it could admittedly be 1 of 3/C up (or even a well-disguised 1-2-1-2-1-2 as EDTs sometimes are) so caution is advised against shorting until the SPX daily trend turns down. Also, this wave (ii) has taken longer than [ii] and is slightly longer than [ii] which makes it unlikely. So, once again, I am going to bump this count down in preference. That brings my ABC/WXY count to 1011 (not depicted but mentioned as count #3 for a while) to the forefront. However, I'm not going to call that my preferred count yet until I see a little more SPX action and have time to re-evaluate the larger counts. For now, I'll rely on the System for guidance and reserve EW opinion for more data. Good luck.____________________________________________________(Update Mon 9:32 AM)All profit taken 1/3 @ 1092, 1/3 @ 1099, 1/3 @ 1104. Total profit 1.6% basically matching the loss in the last trade. SPX may continue higher to our original target near the 200dSMA, but NYAD tells us the risk is flat -to-down today. We may re-enter long when the rules allow us.____________________________________________________(Update Mon 9:22 AM)Active SPX signal: BUY signal from 1081.Hourly trend: Up with support at 1090Daily trend: Up with support at the 20dSMA at 1069ishProfit targets: 1/3 @ 1092, 1/3 @ 1099, 1/3 @ 1112 (changed to 1104 Monday)Trailing stop: 20dSMALast signal: Loss. Sell signal at 1059 on 7/20 gap down. Stopped out at 1076 by rule. Total loss 1.6%. 15 wins, 2 losses, 3 draws since 4/26.System Notes:Small NYAD change at an extreme again means we should take profits earlier than 1112. I'd recommend any new high this morning at 1104-1105._____________________________________________________My 2 preferred counts were pushed to the edge on Friday and possibly beyond in terms of price and time. So, it looks like SPX intends to test the 1131 pivot over the next couple weeks. But, I will re-evaluate by late Sunday night. For now, I want to muse about a couple things.The US is a service-based consumer-led economy. Over several decades, manufacturing has shifted to lower cost countries, and as those countries grew their infrastructure, labor qualifications and trustworthiness, other industries from customer support to software development also shifted. Many people throw around the statistic that 70% of the US economy comes from consumer spending, and my guess is a fair portion of the business-to-business, government and foreign spending is driven indirectly by consumer spending. We are at the point now where myself and many others I talk to are telling their children to avoid debt buildup such as through over-priced education, get a degree in a field that cannot be exported and of course choose something you like. So, I believe the US trend towards consumer and service is a self-reinforcing loop which will continue until something fundamental changes such as the Fair Tax, strong penalties for overseas revenues and investment, strong tariffs or labor costs cut in half.With that in mind, the long-term direction of the economy should be driven by service-based consumer trends. Here are the fundamentals facing consumers for 10-20 years to come.1. Lower pay on average inflation-adjusted. The trend toward lower pay is a natural part of globalization, outsourcing, employment competition etc. State and local govt pension and debt funding problems with lower tax revenues will continue to impact wages, retirement fund and benefits.2. More conservative lending due to tighter credit standards, lessons learned and less leverage.3. More conservative debt-based spending on credit cards, HELOCs etc due to peak credit, bad credit scores, bankruptcies/foreclosures and a changed mindset about lifestyle.4. Steadily declining demographic spending as baby boomers leave proven peak-spending years and enter the downhill slide of making less money and selling stocks & bonds until they require financial help from their younger family members. Sure, some will work longer stealing jobs from teens or middle-age folks but most won't or can't and even if they do they are typically less productive, and keep in mind people are living longer.5. Declining government stimulus in the years ahead. Most people know social security, medicare, benefits and pensions are going to go through major overhauls in the coming years to the detriment of consumers. The government will keep deficits high for years to come but the money spent is unproductive, biased toward the banks, rich and large corporations and comes at a cost of credit-worthiness, pulled-forward demand, speculation, real inflation, higher interest payments and ultimate potential sovereign failure.6. Real estate decline. Foreclosures are just ramping up in 2010 and due to ARM resets and lagging commercial effects are not expected to peak until late 2011 or 2012. Even respected services like Case-Shiller are predicting stable to 10%+ lower prices from here.Let's see. Lower pay, fewer loans, more frugal spending, demographic decline, failing government stimulus and falling real estate values. Not a good formula to increase consumer spending. Of course, maybe job pay merely stabilizes while the government forces ill-conceived loans, temporarily extends tax cuts and supports more bad home loans. Maybe the impact of real estate foreclosures and prices are aided by some new government program and maybe more baby boomers will work longer than I think. But, it's hard to see anything more than status quo and easy to see a dramatic drop in consumer spending, because those 6 trends are massive and certainly difficult to turn quickly. That is why long-term (beyond the next 6 months) it is difficult for me to fathom a strong US economy and thus it is hard to imagine a strong US stock market although big cap stocks and certain specialty stocks may be impacted less by the US economy due to emerging economies.
- Thu 7/22. Buy signal @ 1081. Profit-taking at 1092. I will try to post more tonight, but as I warned Wednesday night and updated before the open, the System issued a BUY signal @ the open at 1081 based on a >.5% gap in a neutral trend. There is no guarantee how long it will last. 1/3 profit-taking was recommended by rule at 1% intervals and/or key pivots. So, I recommended 1092, 1099 and 1113ish. The first one was triggered and should make the trade profitable unless SPX were to gap below 1075. One could have exited the trade with a 1% profit on the breach of 1091 in the last hour, but there was never a 15min close below 1091 so the System officially kept us in the trade.My gut suspicion (which is wrong more often than the System) tells me the fade to 1089 near end of day was merely a breather to relieve overbought conditions for a European bank stress-test induced rally on Friday. But, who knows. This market has been choppy. If we count the 12PM-3:30PM grind up as an EDT 5th of 3, then SPX may retrace 38-62%+ of 1065 which would be 1081 +/- a few points and that happens to be a breakdown/breakout level for the last 2 months. So be prepared for that even if you have a bullish bent. The daily trend will remain up until SPX retests the 20dSMA or falls from higher up. It is also possible that 1098-->1089 (a mere 25% retrace) was 2 of 3 up of some degree likely confirmed by a large gap up or quick rally to 1113ish. Although the System will not turn negative below 1080, the bears would probably need to worry below 1075. However, SPX has created some serious pivots around 1060 and 1100 which need to be pierced by more than a few points to change from resistance to support or vice versa.The preferred bearish counts are still alive but hanging by a thread. Today produced NYAD scissor tops which during the bear phases has led to about 1% upside and 5%+ downside over a few days. But, during the bull phases the results were about 1/3 bad news like the 1150 top, 1/3 flattish +/- 1% over a few days and 1/3 grinding bullish up 2-3% over a few days. So, if we go down hard Fri/Mon before crossing 1100, that favors the bear behavior while anything that holds above 1100 will appear like the bull phase reaction to double top breadth and bears will likely take a back seat for a few days or weeks.Consumer indexes (http://www.consumerindexes.com/) released their weekly analysis. The US consumer deteriorated further and they say their "actual" GDP guess for Q2 is below 0. And, they have been right in recent quarters once the reported numbers have been adjusted down months later. However, their readings are near real-time while the official govt published numbers lag and use 1937 methodologies involving primarily factories, rails, aircraft, inventories and numbers games unlike the just-in-time, service-based, internet-based real economy of today. So, IMHO, the odds favor that the govt will publish decent numbers possibly at or below estimates but then adjust them down closer to 0 over the next few months.ISEE (114) finished neutral today although equity call buyers were the 2nd highest since the 1220 top at 202. The last 3 200+ readings led to 2-3% higher over 3 days, +/- 1% for 3 days, and 5% lower over 3 days. No obvious advantage there although a 198 reading on Tuesday led to the 2% drop on Thursday. Of those 4 days, the 2 more bullish ones had high ISEE index values too, but today's was above average without being extreme. So, once again, no help. It's not the best s/t tool anyway except at extremes which we're near but so much to get excited about. http://www.ise.com/WebForm/viewPage.aspx?categoryId=126Overall, my gut says an 1100 breakout is coming possibly after a pullback to 1080ish and my System is in BUY mode with stop at 1089 now. But, my preferred bearish counts are not quite dead yet (today may have completed a 5-3-5 ABC from 1065), there was negd across smaller timeframes at the highs today, the market has been fickle possibly trying to shake people out before its next move and the end of July seems to be a common cycle target. If we do continue higher, SPX may very well top in the next week or so at 1110-1130+ but of course the System should get us out before it collapses if that were to happen. By my thinking, if SPX were to choose down from here, I'd expect to see a VERY large down day (maybe 3-5%) between Friday and Tuesday. But, Mr. Market will decide and the System and S2EW rules will interpret without intestines. Good luck.
- Wed 7/21. No active signal. Bear counts still preferred. Update 7/22 10:40AM:Buy signal triggered at 1081. 1/3 profit-taking recommended at 1% gain=1092. Another 1/3 profit-taking recommended at 1099...recent price pivot. By rule, you should not allow this profitable trade to turn into a loser and I recommend a stop at the trade entry even though hourly support is around 1065.__________________________________________________________________Update 7/22 9AM:I had to edit my initial post. SPX did not actually close below the 20dSMA today. That makes the drop less bearish. And, based on futures, it may have just been a backtest. The System will issue a buy signal if the gap remains > .5% since the daily trend is still Neutral. Unless the signal is wrong and SPX reverses again, it looks like my preferred counts are losing odds quickly. The ABC count ending at 1110 (with X or 1 to follow) and the expanding EDT are 2 options that will probably fit my S2EW rules but I'll probably need to study things over the weekend with a fresh mind.__________________________________________________________________Active SPX signal: No active signal as of Wednesday night.Hourly trend: Up with support at 1064Daily trend: Neutral explained belowProfit targets: n/aTrailing stop: n/aLast signal: Loss. Sell signal at 1059 on 7/20 gap down. Stopped out at 1076 by rule. Total loss 1.6%. 15 wins, 2 losses, 3 draws since 4/26.System Notes: I almost called a 1/2 sell signal at 1067 today where hourly support was broken on a neutral daily trend. However, the rules do not really account for the current setup since Tuesday's gap down turned the daily trend down only to see the Marker Day high closed above which would normally turn the daily trend up. However, risk/reward was too poor with the 50dSMA near which did turn out to be resistance, and most importantly there was a small NYAD change Tuesday which by rule disallows a trend change and often leads to reversals as occurred intraday. I need to backtest similar scenarios, but I don't recall it occurring much if any in the 10 years of charts I studied. My pure guess is that the first gap down signal was the correct call even though it got stopped out, since the attempted uptrend was rejected by the breadth reversal signal confirmed by yet another close below the 20dSMA. (Edit: SPX did not close below 20dSMA which makes Wednesday's drop less bearish) Still, since the rules are not really clear for such a complex scenario, I decided to err on the side of caution and not issue a sell signal at 1067. I may add another rule that says to avoid signals when rules are unclear. LOL I will issue another signal if there is a gap beyond .5% or a close beyond the original Marker Day hi/lo at 1075/1061 with allowed risk/reward. Opinion: My 2 preferred counts are still alive. I have treated the flash crash as Minute wave 3 of Minor 1 since its inception (anybody seen that movie Inception? I'm going this weekend with my wife.) not just because of its length and strength but because RSI in the S2EW rules said it was likely. Most people quickly dismissed the flash crash as a wave 3 due to the large retrace to 1174. They are merey going by EW guidelines and "look". You must have a technical basis for wave counts and mine is RSI with only a handful of the original EW rules. It doesn't mean I'm right but that I'm limiting the thing that most people hate about EW...its subjectiveness and endless alternate counts and constantly changing counts. When SPX bounced from 1011 with confirming lower RSI, I had to consider that an ABC completed rather than a 1-2-1 but I would not make that a preference until my System confirmed a daily uptrend or breached the 1090-1110 resistance zone. Shortly after, I added the alternate LDT count using 1041 as wave 1 (not 1066 like most) only once the RSI as SPX rose to 1099 surpassed the RSI at 1131 which can happen in nested 2s and triangles. So, now I have 3 possible counts with the bearish 1-2-1-2 count unchanged since the flash crash and the latter 2 added as RSI and price unfolded. I will always judge the data as it arrives, but I've never mentioned the 1-2-1-2 count above 1110 or a 1-2 count above 1131. I just don't think it fits the S2EW rules. So far, so good. The only other count which I will contemplate if SPX were to rally back above 1100 would be an expanding LDT with wave 4 above 1131 since that may end up fitting the S2EW rules, but so far the triangle is contracting, not expanding, and expanding triangles are less common on this time level from my experience. And, RSI already went quite high at 1100 so its going to be a chore to get it much higher than that. Anyway, I mentioned over the weekend that my 2 preferred counts practically required a down week this week with a test of 1011 by end of week or very early next. Of course, the 1-2-1-2 count would continue strongly downward for 1-2 weeks from there while the LDT would drop beloe 1011 but not below 979. So, even though time is not one of my S2EW rules, I will begin to lose faith in the 2 preferred counts if SPX rallies Thu/Fri even if it stays below 1100. Here is the same chart with my 2 main counts. The 3rd bullish count is not shown but 1011 would have ended an ABC in that count. Good luck.
- Tues 7/20. Sell Signal Failed. Buy signal trumped. Active SPX signal: No active signal.Hourly trend: Up with support at 1064Daily trend: Neutral explained belowProfit targets: n/aTrailing stop: n/aLast signal: Loss. Sell signal at 1059 on 7/20 gap down. Stopped out at 1076 by rule. Total loss 1.6%. 15 wins, 2 losses, 3 draws since 4/26.System Notes: By rule, a gap >.5% during a 20dSMA test sets the trend. It rarely fails even though some of the gaps are filled. The thing that bothers me about the failed trade is that the hourly stoch did not cross down which is required in all other signals. I took a quick look at a few otehr 20dSMA test gaps and they had hourly stoch crosses, but I did not backtest extensively yet. I may need to tweak that gap rule. SPX ended up closing above the Marker Day high which should set the trend, but rules state a small change in NYAD rejects a new signal. Plus, the 50dSMA is only a few points above making a poor risk/reward. Opinion: I am helping a friend move houses, so I'm tired. But, I am in limbo anyway. My preferred counts weren't eliminated today. On the bullish side, the Marker Day high was closed above, the 20dSMA was broken and there was a reversal. On the bearish side, TICK was very high, CPCE was very low, the economic news generally confirmed double-dip recession fears and ISEE ended up lower than the 135 bearish level I mentioned on the OEW blog, but it only did so by the index option buyers getting a lot more bearish and the equity option buyers getting more bullish. That's actually bad for the market generally, but it's not real extreme. The small NYAD change often leads to a reversal or flattish day or two. Anyway, sorry I don't have much to add tonight, but I am expecting a pullback or flattish Wednesday with a real market decision on Thursday. I am watching hourly support and the 1090 area plus 50dSMA for more clues. Good luck.
- Mon 7/19. Marker day done. 1061 & 1075. Daily trend is still neutral so anything you trade based on the hourly trend is riskier with small profit targets by rule. Today was a Marker Day. The SPX spoke. It must close above 1075 for a new uptrend likely to 1100-1110+ or it must close below 1061 for a new downtrend likely to 1000-1011 or lower. A large gap can also do the trick.I spent too much time on this blog this weekend and I laid out the scenarios in detail, so my posts will be limited this week. I hadn't visited Alphahorn in a long time, but he has an interesting TNX chart that supports my LDT count. http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_-p17nqJfPI8/TD5z8Ve_9fI/AAAAAAAAB_E/w-7_m58qijg/s1600/tnx.pngThis adds to all the evidence I gave over the weekend, and it would defy EWT once again, so I like it more and more. Tony Caldaro at OEW graciously offered his research on Dow Jones Utilities back to 1929. That inspired me to do the same, since his theory about it leading the economy intrigued me. Who doesn't want to get ahead of the curve? Here is his post.http://caldaroew.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!D2CB8C5EBA2ADE86!81523.entryAnd here is my response..."Hate to splash water on the UTIL theory, but...1. [4] overlaps [1] in Oct 2002 - 164.39 vs 162.522. [3] is less steep than [1] & [5]3. monthly RSI was 88ish near 1946, 89ish near 1961 & 86ish near 2005. No strong RSIs in [3]Most likely is 1) an 80yr LDT w/ retrace to 160/60 OR 2) an expanding EDT 5 of 3/C into 2007 with w4/X to 160-240. 40-85% lower. Ouch!Tony is right. UTIL is leading. It only retraced 45% of 2007 vs Fib 61% for SPX."Tony's site limits posts, so I had to be more abrupt than I am here. To me, RSI, slope, wave overlap and time, plus my S2EW rules, are all things pointing to much more downside in UTIL in the coming years. In fact, if an 80-yr ABC or LDT completed in 2007, the US probably has a tough sled through 2020 or beyond. If wave 3 completed, then wave 4 would equal wave 2 at 9-10 years long which equates to 2016-2017 +/-. Both scenarios would probably support a rally into 2035 coinciding with China's demographic spending bubble like the US has today and the commodity cycle Tony discussed last week. The UTIL analysis doesn't help us much short-term but I agree it's something to keep an eye on as a leading economic indicator although SPX can diverge to some degree like 1932-1942. It looks like futures have perked up. My guess is the housing data and weak earnings reports will have people selling on any morning rally if we get one, but trading on news is risky business so we'll just see what the System has to say. Good luckUpdate Tues morning 8:37amFutures are down big although they have pared their losses after the housing numbers. Likely, SPX will gap down by more than .5% (as measured by SPY candles). That will trigger a System sell signal as long as the short trade entry is better than 1053 (2% risk back to 1075 hourly resistance). Many people do not like to chase gaps but the System has identified the 20dSMA test as a time period when they should be chased, and you also know my S2EW count suggests we could be in 3 of 3 or 3 of 5 down so there's plenty more downside likely even after the gap. 1/3 profit should be taken at 1% intervals with potential reloading based on the rules. One could let the final 1/3 run until SPX falls below the hourly lBB20 for several bars or until hourly resistance is broken (falling from 1075) or with a tight trailing stop or until 1011 is broken. You're pretty much trading the house's money at that point. There are only 2 likely support points prior to sub-1000 IMHO: 1040ish and 1011-1018. My less bearish alternate count is the LDT which should drop below 1011 likely to 985-995. Be aware that there is a slight chance this morning's drop is finishing 1 of 5 with a snap back gap fill test, but the System says it should not reach 1076 and S2EW says it is unlikely. Just something to be aware of so you don't get shaken out. Good luck.
- Fri 7/16. 10% down in 10 days? 20dSMA test underway. Active SPX signal: No active signal.Hourly trend: Still down with resistance falling to 1074.17Daily trend: Neutral since another 20dSMA test is underwayProfit targets: n/aTrailing stop: n/aLast signal: Win. Buy signal at 1088 on 7/13. 1pt drawdown. 1/2 profit taken at a 1% gain at 1099 by rule. Closed on break of hourly support at 1091 by rule. Total gain 0.65%. 15 wins, 1 loss, 3 draws since 4/26.System Notes: (See Terminology and Rules if needed)The System Philosophy (see new link above) is designed to minimize subjectivity. Caution expressed Thursday night was warranted to put it mildly, so I have clarified and enhanced the System Rules (see link above) to reflect the more objective criteria I used to stomp on Thursday's borderline buy signal. As I mentioned when I started this blog, my System is on a journey with change expected. I have only made it public since April on the OEW blog, and it has grown out of my years of research and experience into late 2009. Thank you to those who made recent suggestions regarding charts and rules.First, it may seem odd but I am making it a rule not to place a trade just in front of Options Expiration day. I have suffered more than benefitted from crazy Fed/govt maneuvers on such days but, aside from the personal aspect, the volatility and gap potential is not predictable enough with good enough risk/reward for my System's philosophy which includes hitting singles and doubles with minimal drawdown. This rule supports the rejection of the borderline buy signal on Thursday.Second, risk/reward must now be considered by rule before opening a trade. Maximum risk is 2% and maximum risk-to-reward has been generously set at 1.5 which offsets an ideal 60%-to-40% trade winning percentage even though the System has done much better than that. That limit would have eliminated Thursday's borderline buy signal since the risk/reward was 17/11 or worse. Based on recent history, the drawdown of most System trades has been far under 1% with risk under 2%. System rules define profit-targets very clearly at well-defined profit intervals, key moving averages and pivots, and stops are well defined as well at trailing candle extremes and break-even points. So, there is minimal subjectivity in determining risk/reward making this rule fit the objective and high-win philosophy of this System. I do reserve the right to tweak the max risk and max risk-to-reward ratio over time.Third, hourly and daily s/r (support/resistance) were being determined by the extreme price against trend for the last 4 and 3 candles respectively with leeway of a couple points based on nearby key moving averages and pivots. I refined that to include the specific moving averages I watch and S2EW wave pivots within .5% of the s/r candle. If a key price level is just barely more than .5% away from s/r, one can always enter a trade and take partial profits at that key price level as rules allow for a small win. I still expect most trade signals to be triggered within .2% of s/r so this new rule impacts profit potential minimally while allowing one to avoid high risk trades in a well-defined objective manner.All of these rules combined probably serve to eliminate several trades per year, but they may also serve to keep some trades from being stopped out too quickly. I still think the System will average nearly 2 new trade signals per week with 1-2%+ typical profits on small drawdowns and a high winning percentage. We shall see. Feedback is welcome, although I first encourage you to read the tweaks I made to System Rules, S2EW rules and Philosophy in the links above.Friday produced a 20dSMA Test Day by rule. So, a gap > .5% or a close beyond this Monday's high/low will set the next trend. I mentioned Thursday night that scalpers could trade a drop below daily support at 1080 for partial profits at 5-7 pts. That obviously would have worked and one could be sitting on a 1% gain right now. However, the risk was just under 2% and the risk/reward was too high with a stop back at 1100, so by new rules, the System did not issue a sell signal. I will be backtesting my max risk/reward and max risk rules in detail in August but better safe than sorry for now and there is plenty of potential downside to catch if the hourly and daily trends align back down.Opinion:Let's drill down from long-term to short-term. I'm not going to cover charts beyond a few years, because it doesn't impact my trading time-frame much and I haven't put enough time into older counts.Regardless, here is the SPX 3-year daily chart with S2EW count. One of my favorite blogs (OEW) counts 2007-2009 as an ABC using objective indicators, but I am using my own objective S2EW indicators to arrive at an impulsive count for 2007-2009. However, both counts allow for the March 2009 SPX lows to be tested or broken within our own respective rules. For instance, the OEW count could morph into a double zigzag or other complex correction down from 2007 or it could make a wave 2 retrace all the way down to 667 (although that's not OEW's prediction), while the S2EW count could lead to a wave 3 down to SPX 100-500 or a truncated wave C to 700-800. So, regardless of my historical economic research which shows that the US is in severe trouble, I am open to the possibility that the stock market will diverge and not make new lows within the confines of OEW and S2EW.I normally use daily RSI5 and hourly RSI14 for counting, but as stated in my S2EW rules (see link above), I find those indicators work best in the timeframe of several weeks to several months. In this chart, we are talking 1-3 years for various parts of the S2EW count. So, the chart has annotated daily RSI14 showing how 2007-2009 perfectly conforms to a 5-wave structure. And, just as I use daily RSI5 to confirm hourly RSI14, I can use weekly RSI5 to confirm daily RSI14. It's not shown on the chart above, but OEW has that chart and it confirms the S2EW count as well with OEW's wave 4ofC RSI barely breaking OEW's wave 2ofC RSI which is not allowed in S2EW (when confirmed). Of course, my counting rules are different and I compare OEW out of respect since that's where I've blogged for 3 years and learned a lot from Tony.Still, theS2EW 5-wave count for 2007-2009 is pretty common in the EW-blogosphere even if it's done using other rules. However, I have not seen the S2EW count for March 2009 to April 2010. Granted, most practicing Ellioticians believe SPX is in a correction since March 2009, but the counts vary with some still expecting new highs above 1220. The S2EW count seems rather unique to me, but it is based on rules, not just trying to be different for the sake of it. It is uncommon to see a wave 5 RSI surpass wave 3 in SPX and especially by as much as happened in April 2010. It is more common in commodities and currencies etc (check out USD recently). In addition, the run from February 2010 felt impulsive and somewhat exhaustive. It was short compared to wave "a" but nearly a Fib 38% multiple. It erased the NOPOZO (see Terminology) from 2008 yet never surpassed the 2008 SPX 1256 peak which I declared within a day or so would likely not be surpassed for years. It pierced decade-long price-volume resistance for a few months just like happened on the downside in early 2009. Volume favors the down moves as impulsive, not the up moves. The retrace to 1220 is somewhat weak for a wave 1 up of next degree. The daily and weekly 13/34 SMAs, 50/200SMAs and 50/200EMAs among other moving averages are in bearish configurations and crossovers. Dow and Transports are at risk of a Dow Theory sell signal. Many cycle folks believe that when a cycle rolls over in the first half of a cycle, it is bearish especially in markets that tend to have an historic bullish bias and typiclaly fall faster than they rise. If April 2010 was the 4-year cycle top from March 2009, SPX is highly unlikely to bottom in July/August. So, aside from the appalling economic downturn and S2EW rules, I think there are a lot of ancillary indicators that support the S2EW count.Now, let's look at an SPX daily 4-month chart to zoom in some.My 2 preferred counts are on the chart. The #1 count I've basically maintained without change since the flash crash is that the flash crash was a wave 3 with 1041 the end of Minor wave 1 nearly equaling Minor Wave 1 from October 2007. Once SPX made a new high On Tuesday, I felt like that count was on thin ice in terms of time expectations but let's look at price and time to see what we should expect if this count holds true.First, time. The bearish 1-2-1-2 count shows Minor waves 1&2 took 40 days. Based on time symmetry and the previous bear market behavior, I expect Minor waves 3&4 to take a similar amount of time. However, Minor wave 2 was a flat that retraced about 50% in price and 80%+ in time, so based on the guidelines of Fibs and alternation I'd expect Minor wave 4 to be a zigzag or triangle retracing 23-38% of 1131 in less time. So, that means Minor wave 3 should be 25-30 days in time with Minor wave 4 being 10-15 days long. Adding 25-30 trading days from June 21st gives you July 26-Aug 2 which fits my initial thoughts about late July +/-. So, Minor wave 3 should end in the last week of July +/-.Second, price. Since FIBBEWIE (see Terminology) projects Minor wave 5 to reach 808-862ish, I'm still expecting Minor wave 3 to fall shy of that at 850-925. From another angle, Minute wave 1 was 120pts (1131-1011), so FIBBEWIE projects Minute wave 5 (which concludes Minor wave 3) to reach 855-891. We all know the summer 2009 pivots are at 869 and 956. Also, you can see on my long-term chart that price-volume support exists at 830-900. The NOPOZO for wave "a" from March 2009 is also just above 956. The 50-61.8% Fib retrace of 667-->1220 is 878-944. So, a lot of things tell us that if 1011 is broken, SPX Minor wave 3 is highly likely to drop below 956 and test 875-950.So, there's a certain pace that needs to occur to reach 875-950 by the last week of July +/-. Let's take the middle ground on price and time estimates and say SPX needs to fall 220pts in 28 days (1131-->911, June 21-July 28). If so, SPX needs to fall hard next week. Not testing or breaking 1011 this coming week or will put this count in jeopardy although there's always the chance of a flash crash type episode the following week or an small time extension into the first week of August. In any event, a 10-17% drop over the next 2 weeks +/- a couple days would be quite dramatic. A subsequent rally into late August would fade as Minor wave 5 down took over into September. By then, bearish sentiment should be very extreme just as the typical Oct/Nov swoon is expected. But, SPX could rally for 2-4 months into late 2010 possibly spurred by a 1-2 year partial extension of tax breaks near the elections.Now, my chart's alternative count is a contracting LDT from 1220 with wave 5 still needed to a new low below 1110. Since wave 3 cannot be the shortest wave, wave 5 cannot be more than 120pts to 979 (=1099-120). The bottom of the triangle is at 1000ish now and will be at 1090ish in the next 1-2 weeks. Plus, I think sub-1000 may be needed to really scare people. And, wave 1&2 each took about 20 days while wave 3&4 each took about 9 days, so I'd expect wave 5 to take 6-10 days. And, the LDT wave 3 cannot go any higher without becoming an expanding LDT which is unlikely. So, the LDT target is 980-1010 with 985-995 being likeliest next week or a couple days into the last week of July. Then, SPX would bounce for 2-4 months probably near the elections. Bulls would declare an ABCXABC from 1220 to 1000ish in this count using the flash crash as the first A, and so they'd declare a new bull market and probably worry even less the next time SPX revisited 1000. If you have followed my S2EW rules closely, you might argue that I have a rule against wave 4 RSI exceeding wave 2 RSI, but the rules state that this can occur in triangle scenarios which includes EDTs and LDTs. And, often LDTs and EDTs cause expanding RSI with each wave making a lower low and higher high as we've seen during 1,2,3 and 4 thus far. So, this count is definitely possible within my rules.In both counts, 1100 needs to hold to avoid the verge of elimination. And, in both counts, we're looking for a strong move down this coming week. Both counts would support a test or break of 1011 this week or early next week, but the LDT count would be eliminated below 979. If the bearish count were to play out, a picture perfect EW path to complete Minor wave 3 would be 1131-->1011-->1099-->1045-->1065-->980-->1000-->950-->990-->875-925 but that is just a pure fantasy projection and like most fantasies, it is unlikely to come true. 1058 should be a support area if the bulls are in charge. If SPX drops much below that on Monday, I suspect 1058-1070 will become resistance. If SPX manages to break 1100 and especially 1110 at this point, bullish counts and more drawn out bearish counts will need to be considered.Finally, keep in mind the System which is in neutral 20dSMA test mode. The result of this test will tell us the next trend direction...more than likely before the counts are eliminated above 1100-1110. If there is a gap down > .5%, the System will chase it in this scenario if it can get a price above 1052 to keep risk below 2%. I suspect such a scenario could lead to an attempted gap fill on Mon/Tues, but maybe not since SPX is possibly starting the heart of Minor wave 3. If SPX were to gap up > .5% Monday, the System will not buy it until it clears the 20dSMA at 1072 and turns the hourly trend up at 1075. Those are all the scenarios that I am trading on this coming week. BTW, you might be interested in reading about nearly real-time consumer spending data at http://www.consumerindexes.com/. Basically, late June saw a small bounce due to hot weather and July 4th sales, but new lows were just set this week. The ISEE sentiment index (http://www.ise.com/WebForm/viewPage.aspx?categoryId=126) just had a reading of 66. The 9 readings in 2010 <= 77 led to lower short-term prices, while one reading of 78 led to a couple percent higher into the 1220 top before plunging, so at least initially, the bearish sentiment on ISEE is a leading indicator. WLEI indicators are only .2% above recession-prediction levels. Unemployment benefits expired in June wreaking havoc on hundreds of thousands of unemployed according to the latest UE claims report. Maybe an extension approval by Congress in late July will be the catalyst for Minor wave 4 in the bearish scenario or a 2-4 month ABC in the LDT scenario. Consumer confidence and manufacturing indexes dropped hard last week and are suggesting imminent economic contraction. Jobs are not growing without government largesse and more state and local govts are facing imminent bankruptcy. Stats show the inventory rebound phase from 2009 is over. Government stimulus is past its peak as approved and what was done only brought demand forward as evidenced by home, auto and appliance sales. Basically, the last month's data has been absolutely horrible and unless you expect things to turn upward in the next 3-6 months, you gotta believe the stock market is going to reflect a double-dip recession pretty quickly. Then, the next leg down after that if we get it as I suspect would be pricing in a depression unfortunately. You can see the next 2+ weeks of stock market activity into the first week of August are probably critical to determining what economic path we're on for the rest of the year. The LDT count suggests more muddle-through, spurts and sputters for a few months maybe into the elections, while the bearish 1-2-1-2 count suggests double-dip recession this year and getting above 1110 suggests stable slow growth the rest of the year. That's my opinion anyway. Good luck.Sunday night update (7PM): Just thought you might be interested in a few links.McLaren has a different technical perspective, but he points to July 24th as a likely turn date, either top or bottom. http://www.mclarenreport.net.au/articles/articles/237/1/July-09-2010-CNBC-SQUAWKBOX-EUROPE/Page1.htmlSince July 24th is a Saturday and his numbers are not meant to be accurate to the day, McLaren's take would support a low at the end of this week or early next week. That syncs up better with the LDT timing (my alternate count within S2EW rules), and his possible low projection of 950 also syncs up better with the LDT although I contend it should not drop below 979 in that count.Terry Laundry over at TTheory.com has yet another technical perspective based on breadth and time symmetry over 30 years. http://ttheory.typepad.com/files/srtvo20100716pdf.pdfHis latest chart and audio analysis suggests a lower top around August 26th. A few weeks ago or so, he believed SPX would drop into late July and then bounce into late August. Now, even though SPX has been rejected by his mid-channel price line he believes the recent 1011 bottom was significant with positive divergence on breadth and now a backtest of the breadth 0 line which means SPX will bounce to a lower high into late August. He also uses ARM/TRIN to support his views and TRIN was at 5 Friday. However, when I look back at the TRIN spikes near 4+ over the last 6 months, it looks like the vast majority of them led to some down movement the next morning followed by a 1-2 day rally but then the odds favored further downside. Also, Terry himself stated that ARM/TRIN will likely need to spike higher in this next bear market than the previous one to have the same rebound effect. Having listened to his weekend audio for a couple months now, I believe if SPX fails after a few hours or maybe 1-2 days on its next TRIN-induced rally attempt and his breadth indicator breaks below 0 for a couple days, he will revisit his initial prediction of a low in July with higher than normal TRIN spikes followed by a rally into late August, because his theory is best at predicting approximate rally end points than the turns in the middle of his Ts as was evident during the initial flash crash. Thus, I think T Theory also supports a late July low and lateAugust rebound to a lower top. T Theory then expects a drop and (near-)retest of that August high before it gets really nasty for a couple years. Honestly, the LDT could fit that theory by making a final low in 1+ week followed by an A wave into late August and a weak C wave into late Sep/Oct before nasty downfalls begin. And, my bearish 1-2-1-2 count could also fit if wave 3 concluldes in 2 weeks +/- with a Minor wave 4 rally into late August followed by an Intermediate wave 2 rally a little above that August high in Q42010 before nastiness begins. Still, I think the LDT would match Terry's data a little better.Cobra has a lot of data supporting one more low into late July +/- including moon & solar stuff, consumer sentiment backtesting, Gann and Fib time retracements. http://cobrasmarketview.blogspot.com/One thing he posted that caught my eye even though I do remember seeing it months back is the Mutual Fund cash %. Mutual Funds are holding the lowest cash % (about 3.5%) since the data going back to 1950. It's about a tie with the 2007 stock market top. Hmmm. That certainly supports the long-term bear case. About half of the cash-raising 1 year spikes in history have been 2-3% like the 2007-2009 bear market. Spiking 5-8% over 2-3 years has happened a number of times in bear markets. The 1990s, especially 1995-2000, was supported by a 9% cash-reduction. It is an undeniable fact that the huge baby boomer retirement bubble over the next 20 years will deplete retirement funds unlike any other time in recent decades, and more unemployment and lower pay means less stock purchases even if savings % increases. Combine that with Mutual Funds decreasing their stock holdings in favor of cash as history says they will soon to reduce risk, and you have the meeting of 3 powerful forces against stock prices. And, in this case, the startting point is more extreme since true unemployment is historically high, mutual fund cash is historically low and there has not been a spending/retirement bubble like the baby boomer bubble since the 1880s which was mitigated by immense immigration. Basically, that Mutual Fund Cash % chart is just another piece of the puzzle that shows that the US best case is a muddle through economy and worst case is a massive depression.Anyway, all 3 of these links support my 2 preferred S2EW counts with lots of supporting evidence. However, 2 of the 3 give at least equal chance to a continued rally into late August (McLaren and TTheory) and all 3 seem to lean towards my alternate LDT count in their bearish interpretations. I mentioned a week or so ago that my LDT scenario was growing on me, and part of the reason for that was that RSI at 1099 surpassed RSI at 1131 by more than a point or two. That's allowed for wave 2s but the higher RSI goes adds weight to a triangle situation. Still, my count since the flash crash has served well so I'm not going to officially change my preference until needed although I'm fully watchful for an LDT wave 5 low at 980-1110 (probably sub-1000 to scare off double bottom callers). Even if the bearish 1-2-1-2 count is in play, I fully expect SPX to bounce from 980-990 before resuming downward, so either count will be viable at that point and sentiment, RSI, System etc will be important to watch in such a scenario on the retrace downward of that bounce off 980-990.Update Sunday night 9PM:OK. Although I mentioned earlier this week that my USD count looked destroyed and I don't like biasing my SPX analysis too much with other indexes, the correlation makes sense to me even in the 90s when SPX and USD both rose since I believe strong stable economic growth and stable monetary/rate policy drive both markets although the kicker is that USD is relative to other countries. During 2003-2007, SPX rose based on reasonable economic growth and accomodative monetary policy, but USD recognized that growth wasn't stellar especially relative to places like China and Brazil and that monetary policy was not stable or as strict as other places like Europe, so USD fell in negative correlation with SPX. I think we are now in a period where economic growth is weak if not becoming depressionary and monetary policy can't get much more accomodative, so SPX is in danger of falling while USD sees that economic growth may be worse in Europe and severely slowing in emerging markets with monetary policies abroad that have room to get a lot more accomdative in terms of interest rates and bailouts versus the floor the US has hit. So, SPX can fall as USD rises in that environment. Now, if the Fed/govt openly prints money or economic growth surprises, that scenario may change. Basically, I see a negative correlation continuing for another year or two. I'm not going to trade purely on that, but I'd be even more confident about my uber-bearish SPX scenarios if we see USD rally as confirmation. Let's revisit the USD chart I posted a few days ago, but now I've replaced my 1-2-1-2 count with an ABCX count that still fits the S2EW rules since wave C often ends with higher RSI than wave A. All the other 5-wave impulse RSI stuff I noted still applies for wave ABC just like it did for 121. The ABCX count also better explains the weak 25-30% wave 2 retrace since wave Bs are more often 23-38% Fib retraces. And, currencies and commodities seem to move around more in 3-wave moves than 5-wave impulses. The X-wave has nearly retraced 50% and has intraday overlapped wave A but has not completely retraced wave B. IMHO, this is a perfect spot to bounce imminently. If so, it would support either of my bearish counts. However, if you look at the behavior of waves 1&2 since December 2009, you will see that SPX tends to trade sideways in USD wave 1s up and then strongly higher during USD wave 2s down. It is not until USD wave 3s up that SPX falls hard. Once again like the links earlier tonight, that seems to fit the LDT scenario best to me because the last 2 USD wave 1s lasted 1.5-4 weeks and SPX could trade choppy sideways (maybe 990-1070) during that time period and then spike higher to 1100-1180 when USD has its wave 2 followed by an SPX collapse once USD hits its next wave 3 up. However, if USD wave Y is going to be more powerful than wave W, then I'd expect USD to rally hard and that could support the more bearish SPX 1-2-1-2 count. So, if SPX falls in the next week or so near 1000, we will hopefully be able to use USD as one guage of which bearish scenario is occurrring. On the other hand, if USD tanks this week, I might start to favor the USD wave 2 down scenario or even a more bearish count that would support a more drawn out SPX rally or even SPX bull market.
- Thu 7/15. No active signal. Decision dilemma. Active SPX signal: No active signal.Hourly trend: Down with resistance at 1099.46Daily trend: Up since the 20dSMA test succeeded with support at 1080.53.Profit targets: n/aTrailing stop: n/aLast signal: Win. Buy signal at 1088 on 7/13. 1pt drawdown. 1/2 profit taken at a 1% gain at 1099 by rule. Closed on break of hourly support at 1091 by rule. Total gain 0.65%. 15 wins, 1 loss, 3 draws since 4/26.System Notes: (Please see Terminology and Rules if you don't understand a technical reference)Today is an example of a difficult system decision where you folks might be able to help improve the system. I leaned on the side of caution. The extreme of 4 hourly candles was broken on the final hour move today at 1095.36 and stoch crossed upward from below 50. That fits system rules and one could have entered a trade at 1096ish. However, I mentioned that I am flexible with hourly/daily resistance by a couple points if pivots/MAs are near since the market treats them with importance. Well, SPX topped at 1099.46 and 1099.08 just a few hours earlier and the hourly uBB20 is also at 1100. Yes, those numbers are 4 points higher, not 2. But, I just don't have a strict rule yet on that. And, subjectively, I understand that the market has traveled far without a large pullback, is at OPEX, is in a strong 1090-1110 resistance zone, is prone to large gaps with VIX holding its 20dSMA and USD forming a bottom. I can also see SPX may have finished an expanding EDT 5th near the close or the 3rd wave of such an EDT. So, risk is high. I'd like to see 1100 pierced by a point and closed above on the 15min chart before entering a trade at 1101ish if possible. But, even then, the upside target would be 1% and the 200dSMA at 1112 which happens to also be 1%. Downside risk would be 1084 (1085-1 flex) on a first hour high tomorrow making risk 17pts and reward 11pts. Hmmm. SPX is at higher risk than normal of topping at least for a couple days and the trade risk/reward is 17/11...very bad especially for a system trying to catch 1-2%+ in the heart of trends, not scalps. So, at some point, I will likely include risk/reward in the system rules in fuzzy situations, but maybe you have other good ideas. Of course, SPX could blast right through the 200dSMA but then I'd guess a much much better risk/reward long-side trade would appear on a backtest.Interestingly, daily trend support has risen to 1080.53, so there is a 5-6pt (.5%) tradeable window between there and the 20dSMA which becomes the target when the daily trend turns down from above it. If you like to scalp a few pts and SPX drops Fri/Mon, I have backtested that trade on paper and discovered high odds, but the risk/reward probably won't be good especially if there are any long red candles in the 3-4 hours preceding the 1080 break. So, like I said earlier this week, my system will likely remain fairly inactive while SPX is stuck between its 20dSMA and 200dSMA. BTW, I think my USD count has been dismantled. I'll revisit it soon, but SPX is my real focus and the index my system and rules were built around. I just look to USD, financials, volatility etc for a little more insight into SPX waves but to be honest I think they just get in the way by causing bias most the time. And, it's difficult enough to keep up with SPX. So, I am leaning towards not discussing any non-SPX entity unless it is baked int System rules like I use SPY to measure gap percentages, NYAD (breadth) to call potential reversals that change the daily trend neutral and Dow/Nasdaq for divergences with SPX at pivots/MAs. I mainly want to research things that have a high accuracy of predicting very short-term reversals which helps with profit-taking on trends and decisions on questionable risk/reward trades. That reminds me that NYAD today made a small change which often leads to a big move based on my personal study, but, interestingly, while SPX traded sideways to ever so slightly up the last 2 days, NYAD actually fell...and below 0. The only time I could find the same scenario in the last year was Nov 18, 2009 in which the last 3 days' candles also match very well, and that case led to a 2-day 2.1% pullback followed by 4 weeks of sideways action in a 30pt range. Today, that would only suggest a test of the 20dSMA and then more bouncing between the 20dSMA and 200dSMA. Eyeballing it, a good-sized NYAD drop while SPX trades sideways followed by a small NYAD change is about 60-65% bullish the next day, but almost all examples occur with NYAD>0. Can't rely on one sample of NYAD<0 so everything I look at is indecisive. Better to just not trade until a better setup appears...like the system suggests. Good luck.
- July 14. Buy signal ended profitable. What next? Active SPX signal: No active signal.Hourly trend: Down with resistance at 1099.46Daily trend: Up since the 20dSMA test succeeded.Profit targets: n/aTrailing stop: n/aLast signal: Win. Buy signal at 1088 on 7/13. 1pt drawdown. 1/2 profit taken at a 1% gain at 1099 by rule. Closed on break of hourly support at 1091 by rule. Total gain 0.65%. 15 wins, 1 loss, 3 draws since 4/26.System Notes:A break above 1099.46 by more than a pt and 15 mins should lead to a test of the 200dSMA. 100% profit-taking would be recommended at 1110-1112 for a 1% gain. A trailing stop would be recommend 4 hourly candlesticks lower. No sell signal is expected until SPX reverses from higher or fails a test of the 20dSMA. The system is likely to be fairly inactive until SPX breaks above the 200dSMA or below the 20dSMA.Opinion:I still think USD is bottoming. VIX diverged today. OPEX is containing things as often occurs. Banks and financials acted badly today. SPX is still in its difficult resistance zone 1090-1110 up against a downtrend line. We're certainly at a spot where most bulls and bears are expecting a pullback, but once again the waves and RSI tell me another small jaunt up seems probable, perhaps to the 200dSMA area or perhaps a tiny piercing. Initial claims on Thursdays have often caused big moves. But, not much changed today so I'm just saying a lot of nothing and we wait for a signal. Good luck.
- Active Buy Signal 1088. 1/2 Profit at 1099. Active SPX signal: Buy signal at 1088. 1/2 profit taken at 1099. 1pt drawdown.Hourly trend: Up with support at 1091.62.Daily trend: Up since the 20dSMA test succeeded.Profit targets: 1/2 taken at 1%. Sell the rest at 200dSMA at 1111.Trailing stop: Trail at hourly support, currently 1091.Last signal: Draw. Sell signal at 1030 on 7/6. 1/3 profit taken at 1019 by rule. Closed flat at 1035 on 7/7 by rule.System Notes: The active signal is a guaranteed profitable trade unless SPX gaps below 1077. Opinion: The above signal is not a trade I took due to numerous resistances at 1090-1100 after a long rally and large gap up, but, as usual, the system knows better than me and it mainly finds 1-2% 1-2 day trades with little drawdown. Daily RSI confirmed hourly RSI today by breaking its high set at SPX 1131. Price entered the 1090-1110 resistance zone. Time has now surpassed the ideal 1-2-1-2 setup. So, even though EW technically still allows this rally to be Minute [ii] of Minor 3, the odds are growing fast for other counts like the bearish LDT or bullish ABC conclusion at 1011. My system is key though, and I'd like to see if the count clears up in a day or two before making an official change. I want to discuss RSI since it can be used in so many ways. Here is a link that is the basis for some of my points. http://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school:technical_indicators:relative_strength_in SPX may have completed a swing failure when RSI14 fell below 30, bounced, held 30 and then surpassed the previous bounce. However, RSI5 and RSI8 do not confirm and even RSI14 only showed pennies of divergence with RSI only breaching and holding 30 by pennies. Not real convincing. The intermediate-term to long-term trend is more convincingly down using RSI14 trend ranges. An RSI of 40-90 is associated with bull markets and 10-60 is associated with bear markets. Although that covers 90% of the price action, the SPX charts since 1980 show RSI dipping to30-35 during lots of big bull market dips and even 25-30 often. Hitting 71+ after a sub-31 low does seem to be a regularly bullish sign if price gets a few percent above its 200dSMA at the same time and especially if combined with a positive divergence. Hitting 25ish or lower commonly leads to at least a retest of the low before rising again especially if price is below the 200dSMA and sometimes it indicates a bear market. Unfortunately, we have none of these signs today. Recently, there is a tiny tiny positive divergence and RSI14 did hit 30, but price is below the 200dSMA and RSI has not reached 71+. Not real convincing either. We also do not have a positive reversal above 30 (the opposite of a positive divergence). So, there are some RSI tools to watch but nothing has triggered yet. USD obviously did not bottom yesterday as I thought probable, but it still supports the 1-2-1-2 count from December and I wasn't expecting SPX to drop hard until it enters the heart of wave 3. USD should be turning up very soon. Interesting that VIX and SPX are both within pennies of mirroring their early June moves. e.g. (1131-1042)-(1099-1011)=0.52 Getting late and I'm tired. More tomorrow night. I will also be expaining my system in more detail with sample charts probably this weekend or next. Good luck.
Copyright © Investor Idol. Powered by TheInflationist.
